Test is sufficient to be a Mogger, well researched, easily combatible sides and most commonly used in Hollywood with hardly any issues if you have two brain cells to rib together
Yeah test is enough for most people to get some good gains
that's unironically you
bro he's like 6'10
why do blacks need roids jfl
they don't need to worry about hair loss so hurray for them
Seethe more because I called you a loser in your own thread day before yesterday. Blatant projection, you whiny estrogenic skinny fat bitch.
Fair enough. Though it was one of them "I don't want to cheat because I want to earn my body" or some cope like that. Wanting to reach your natural limit is reasonable.
Keep coping you anorexic baby
29 minutes and that's what you came up with?
blah blah blah29 minutes and that's what you came up with?
Genes/Roids > Nutrition > Training. In terms of mass training is the least important part of the equation. The factors that affect muscle mass are frame(shoulder width and bone thickness), muscle belly length(long muscle bellies have more potential for growth), and body chemistry(testosterone is king). If you are following a protein and calorie sufficient diet and intelligent training program and not gaining much muscle, your deficient in at least 2 of these things, likely all three of them. Roids fix at least of these things. The worse your frame, the shorter your muscle bellies, the more you'll have to take to keep up. I list roids equal to genes because trenbolone has the power to offset even decidingly subpar genes.
The amount of muscle that can be gained naturally can easily be surpassed with a few steroid cycles. And in my experience, you'll be hard pressed to have a mogger natty physique without tellem t caliber genetics. I think most people with a couple years of lifting experience would agree you'll be hard pressed to get a impressive without genes of this caliber.
You are held hostage by the male gaze if you think bigger mass equals more attractive phyisique to girlsGenes/Roids > Nutrition > Training. In terms of mass training is the least important part of the equation. The factors that affect muscle mass are frame(shoulder width and bone thickness), muscle belly length(long muscle bellies have more potential for growth), and body chemistry(testosterone is king). If you are following a protein and calorie sufficient diet and intelligent training program and not gaining much muscle, your deficient in at least 2 of these things, likely all three of them. Roids fix at least of these things. The worse your frame, the shorter your muscle bellies, the more you'll have to take to keep up. I list roids equal to genes because trenbolone has the power to offset even decidingly subpar genes.
View attachment 1742314
The amount of muscle that can be gained naturally can easily be surpassed with a few steroid cycles. And in my experience, you'll be hard pressed to have a mogger natty physique without tellem t caliber genetics. I think most people with a couple years of lifting experience would agree you'll be hard pressed to get a impressive without genes of this caliber.
Cope, his body is like the male version on lana rhoades.
LOW IQ
U look goodPosted my most recent physique in the thread below. I am 100% lifetime natty 5'10'' 187ish in that video in that thread. But yea I haven't made any size gains since the first year and a half of lifting, after that as a natty ur gains are going to be non existent.
But the most attractive physique to women is having visible muscles with defined 6 pack abs. Abs are the ONLY muscle group I EVER get complimented on by actual real females. It's only other fucking dudes that are like "nice shoulders bro" "damn those biceps man" etc
@Prettyboy is spot on about male gaze vs female gaze when it comes to muscle and size
I’ve came to the same conclusion. The limiting factor for most natural gym goers is their knowledge base, not the genetic cards they were dealt with. Looking back at my own journey, I could have done many things much more efficiently had I known it back then
Same conclusion on my part. Not saying a well defined V taper is not essential for a good frame, but to be frank girls who I have slept with are always stuck on three areas muscle on me: abs, obliques and the Adonis belt.Posted my most recent physique in the thread below. I am 100% lifetime natty 5'10'' 187ish in that video in that thread. But yea I haven't made any size gains since the first year and a half of lifting, after that as a natty ur gains are going to be non existent.
But the most attractive physique to women is having visible muscles with defined 6 pack abs. Abs are the ONLY muscle group I EVER get complimented on by actual real females. It's only other fucking dudes that are like "nice shoulders bro" "damn those biceps man" etc
@Prettyboy is spot on about male gaze vs female gaze when it comes to muscle and size
What's his name? He appears to just be a kid in the first pic. Just go through puberty brooffset even decidingly subpar genes.
you forgot one of the most important thing which is sleep you need at least 8 hours every night for optimal hormones energy and improved body composition
If you don't find what you doing in the gym challenging or hard then you like just proved you don't know the most important things about lifting which is intensity and the mechanical tension you put on the muscle you retard fighter pilot
Oliver Forslin. He's a colossal steroid abuser given how much time he spends with Mike Thurston and Joe Lindner(who even admits he's on TRT YEAR ROUND due to fucking up his hormones with tren at 18).
trust me physique is never good natty, the standard if ur face is not good enough is like natty peak- fitness model, aka u have muscle enough to look big in a shirt but ur still lean as fuck.
Thats me natty - theres pumped shirtless pic and relaxed t shirt pic so you can see how big I look in clothes- you can see I am not huge in T shirt but it is 100% noticable I lift in clothers + ripped shirtless
duta
