shikimorilover69
Silver
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2025
- Posts
- 638
- Reputation
- 668
Its common knowledge that when you are on a higher calorie defeict you will lose more muscle.
E.g on a natural cut you may be on a 300-400 calorie defecit but reta it may well be more than 1000 depending on your dosage.
But then reta you will loose more muscle per day but on natural cut you will loose less muscle per day.
However, on the reta cut you will complete it faster whereas the natural cut will take longer.
So naturally you loose less muscle per day but over a longer period of time, whereas on reta you loose more muscle per day but it takes shorter to complete.
So the question is which option would cause the least TOTAL muscle loss?
Is there an optimum deficit?
E.g on a natural cut you may be on a 300-400 calorie defecit but reta it may well be more than 1000 depending on your dosage.
But then reta you will loose more muscle per day but on natural cut you will loose less muscle per day.
However, on the reta cut you will complete it faster whereas the natural cut will take longer.
So naturally you loose less muscle per day but over a longer period of time, whereas on reta you loose more muscle per day but it takes shorter to complete.
So the question is which option would cause the least TOTAL muscle loss?
Is there an optimum deficit?
