New manlet hope

iblameb

iblameb

Currently drifting through life
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Posts
1,908
Reputation
3,593
Yo is this guys true?
 

Attachments

  • AISelect_20260505_175617_TikTok.jpg
    AISelect_20260505_175617_TikTok.jpg
    216 KB · Views: 0
"body has to do less to achieve muscle" is such a stupid cope, muscle on short people looks terrible compared to it on tall people, doesn't matter how quickly you build it
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameb and vvs445
"body has to do less to achieve muscle" is such a stupid cope, muscle on short people looks terrible compared to it on tall people, doesn't matter how quickly you build it
Very dependent on proportions. U can have a short torso at 6'3 or a long torso at 5'9 and look better. Case dependent
 
  • +1
Reactions: kimorishi
Yo is this guys true?
Muscle one is completely false unless you are above 6'4

I'm 6'1 and I would argue building muscle above 6'0 is basically more work for more reward. Harder to put on muscle (depends on genes) but once you get the muscle on it looks better than on a shorter person.

Above 6'4 though you will get issues with certain exercises like your bench press/squat 1RM will probably be lower cuz longer limbs and you need more muscle to look buff bc of insertions.

20 years old right now and used to have 15-16 inch arms at 16 and 6'0 so its pretty much cope
 

Similar threads

jueishfoidrpsit
Replies
7
Views
39
iamnotgrayipromise
iamnotgrayipromise
V
Replies
7
Views
84
Finalkiosk
Finalkiosk
idkwhatimdoingtbh
Replies
21
Views
120
idkwhatimdoingtbh
idkwhatimdoingtbh
Mikami\
Replies
5
Views
56
mistyjfl
mistyjfl
Ihatefoids1_1
Replies
70
Views
248
him.
him.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top