New Possible Appeal System for Warnings

[Alexanderr]

In short, I am considering the introduction of an appeal system for warnings. This thread is to gauge the receptiveness to the possible change.

What would change?

• Eligibility: Users who received a certain warning level or higher (e.g. 30%), and who meet other specified criteria (e.g. non-repeat offender), can appeal their warnings.
• Appeal Process: Eligible users submit their case through a form, providing details and any supporting evidence.
• Review: The appeal will undergo an independent, anonymous review by staff to ensure fairness and moderator accountability.

Proposed Appeal System Overview:

• Collective Staff Review: Appeals will be reviewed by the entire staff, not limited to the warning issuer.
• Anonymous Staff Voting: Decisions on each appeal will be made through an anonymous staff vote, with options to retract the warning, reduce its percentage, or maintain it as is.

The criteria for eligibility aren't entirely established yet, so it may be subject to some changes.

If you support the change, vote for Option 1. If you prefer the system to stay as it is, vote for Option 2.

 

[Alexanderr]

Threads open again.

 

[_MVP_]

I think its a good thing, the proposed introduction

 

[Deleted member 51465]

update botb

 

[Arditi]

nice, but who is lamarcus smaII?

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

No. The staff are biased and close minded cucks

 

[BrendioEEE]

All I know is, i'm glad the staff isn't gooning trannies who have a CP porn addiction who falseban me like 4chan administration.

Merry Christmas.

 

[pneumocystosis]

don’t warnings last 1 month anyway?

You gotta be a serious nuisance if you get 100% in 30 days…

 

[schizo echochamber]

Just ban all grays theory

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Let the community of trolls decide. Poll it.

 

[snitch]

don’t warnings last 1 month anyway?

You gotta be a serious nuisance if you get 100% in 30 days…

Seriously like what's the point

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

All I know is, i'm glad the staff isn't gooning trannies who have a CP porn addiction who falseban me like 4chan administration.

Merry Christmas.

Now that's where you're wrong.

 

[BrendioEEE]

Now that's where you're wrong.

Cope?

 

[Spiritualcell]

All I know is, i'm glad the staff isn't gooning trannies who have a CP porn addiction who falseban me like 4chan administration.

Merry Christmas.

I'm glad as well!

 

[enchanted_elixir]

update botb

it does get updated, just very slowly with new submissions.

 

[emeraldglass]

don’t warnings last 1 month anyway?

You gotta be a serious nuisance if you get 100% in 30 days…

You would be surprised to witness how certain users can accumulate as much as 70 percent within a single week. Also, for specific offenses, penalties of 20 percent may be assigned, while for others, it could go beyond 30 percent and even higher.

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

You would be surprised to witness how certain users can accumulate as much as 70 percent within a single week.

True, how is that even possible?

 

[Debetro]

Option 1. Merry Christmas, I wish you a prosperous year.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

When will this be implemented?

 

[BoredPrince]

Voting for option 1 just in case I have something to lean on in the future

 

[distance decay]

True, how is that even possible?

From being a forum menace

 

[Lookologist003]

I hate to be a kiss-ass, but is it really that hard to follow the rules on this forum? The rules here I would hardly consider strict and yet aren't enforced.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

I hate to be a kiss-ass, but is it really that hard to follow the rules on this forum? The rules here I would hardly consider strict and yet aren't enforced.

hmmm

 

[Alexanderr]

When will this be implemented?

I've got most of it setup already, just a few details to figure out. Maybe in a week or two.

 

[Alexanderr]

don’t warnings last 1 month anyway?

You gotta be a serious nuisance if you get 100% in 30 days…

I hate to be a kiss-ass, but is it really that hard to follow the rules on this forum? The rules here I would hardly consider strict and yet aren't enforced.

This system accounts for potentially unjust or overly harsh warnings, acknowledging that moderation is not infallible.

 

[Corleone]

Voted 2 because Option 1 sounds like a lot of work.

I value the mods‘ time too much to force them to sit through shizo-unban meetings everyday.

They are unpaid slaves from within our own ranks, we can‘t kill all their fun.

If you got an unjust or overly harsh punishment and didn‘t establish any credibility with at least one mod who could swing things your way you probably don‘t deserve the unban anyway.

 

[0hMan]

Voted 2 because Option 1 sounds like a lot of work.

I value the mods‘ time too much to force them to sit through shizo-unban meetings everyday.

They are unpaid slaves from within our own ranks, we can‘t kill all their fun.

If you got an unjust or overly harsh punishment and didn‘t establish any credibility with at least one mod who could swing things your way you probably don‘t deserve the unban anyway.

Appreciated. Seriously. I don't know though, it seems alright but I wonder how it will work considering we have a bunch of new mods that don't really know the ropes yet.

 

[Corleone]

Appreciated. Seriously.

Now get us the „watch a user“-feature back, so we get notifications when they post new threads, and life will be good again.

 

[Alexanderr]

If you got an unjust or overly harsh punishment and didn‘t establish any credibility with at least one mod who could swing things your way you probably don‘t deserve the unban anyway.

Trying to charm the entire mod team at once, hm? Could come in handy for future favors, I guess

 

[Alexanderr]

Appreciated. Seriously. I don't know though, it seems alright but I wonder how it will work considering we have a bunch of new mods that don't really know the ropes yet.

Sub-moderators wouldn't be part of the equation.
It'll be a simple appeal system, users write one lengthy version (where they can elaborate if they wish) and one summarized, three-bullet point version (to give the moderators a gist of the appeal, if they don't want to read the lengthy version), and they take a vote.
The requirements to appeal will need to be figured out to keep the workload manageable.

 

[0hMan]

Now get us the „watch a user“-feature back, so we get notifications when they post new threads, and life will be good again.

That would be nice. @Alexanderr Whatever happened to that?

 

[moggathon]

i hate the mods

 

[Alexanderr]

That would be nice. @Alexanderr Whatever happened to that?

Must've been @Master, I guess.

 

[0hMan]

Must've been @Master, I guess.

@Master CALLING THE KING JEW.

 

[Deleted member 51465]

Holy pickle on a stickle!
@Alexanderr i havent had reacting abilities for 25 days pls give them back
i

 

[Corleone]

@Master CALLING THE KING JEW.

Bro, is probably still trying to figure out how to turn it into a paid-VIP feature, else he would have added it back long ago

 

[Hardrada]

Bumo

 

[fukmylyf]

appeals me

 

[Lux]

Collective Staff Review: Appeals will be reviewed by the entire staff, not limited to the warning issuer.

This is the only part that really needs to be added. I believe this was already the case sometimes where if a mod was inactive another would just answer the appeal.

It sounds like this whole anonymous independent form thing will really just make it easy for users to never get a second chance if mods are biased.

 

[Harold O'brien]

i propose a new system: dont ban anyone for any reason unless they break the law or mass spam

 

[BrendioEEE]

i propose a new system: dont ban anyone for any reason unless they break the law or mass spam

Honestly I agree, but I still think doxxing, and no females should be banned aswell.

 

[Cigarette]

forum is turning into facebook

 

[Harold O'brien]

Honestly I agree, but I still think doxxing, and no females should be banned aswell.

Yes for doxxing but females should be welcomed with open arms!

 

[BrendioEEE]

Yes for doxxing but females should be welcomed with open arms!

Cope

 

[lestoa]

Yes for doxxing but females should be welcomed with open arms!

what

 

[Iasacrko]

I agree because i rescently got a 70% warning for doxing when the guy literally posted his pic before and apperantly deleted it with VIP later

Is everyone just supposed to know that? In my opinion the most I should get for that is a deletion on my thread not a 2 day ban and 70% warning unless I repost him after the thread got deleted

 

[moggathon]

yes or just kill all of the mods and run this place into the ground

 

[Aypo129]

Genocides against all mods is a necessity

 

[Deleted member 24770]

Yes for doxxing but females should be welcomed with open arms!

Incels here would flex their reputation to win over girls then JFL

 

[Harold O'brien]

Incels here would flex their reputation to win over girls then JFL

exactly

nothing more entertaining than self-identifying alpha males who regularly berate women suddenly becoming pathetic simps for a terminally online girl showing 1/8 of her face that has been airbrushed