New Possible Appeal System for Warnings

[Deleted member 24770]

exactly

nothing more entertaining than self-identifying alpha males who regularly berate women suddenly becoming pathetic simps for a terminally online girl showing 1/8 of her face that has been airbrushed

Would simp for the same femcels/ltbs that they hate irl on here JFL at the first chance they get jfl

 

[Deleted member 66574]

In short, I am considering the introduction of an appeal system for warnings. This thread is to gauge the receptiveness to the possible change.

What would change?

• Eligibility: Users who received a certain warning level or higher (e.g. 30%), and who meet other specified criteria (e.g. non-repeat offender), can appeal their warnings.
• Appeal Process: Eligible users submit their case through a form, providing details and any supporting evidence.
• Review: The appeal will undergo an independent, anonymous review by staff to ensure fairness and moderator accountability.

Proposed Appeal System Overview:

• Collective Staff Review: Appeals will be reviewed by the entire staff, not limited to the warning issuer.
• Anonymous Staff Voting: Decisions on each appeal will be made through an anonymous staff vote, with options to retract the warning, reduce its percentage, or maintain it as is.

The criteria for eligibility aren't entirely established yet, so it may be subject to some changes.

If you support the change, vote for Option 1. If you prefer the system to stay as it is, vote for Option 2.

how to do this

 

[Tylermax]

give me admin faggot. i know more looks than you ever will

 

[baggdirt]

No. The staff are biased and close minded cucks

DONT EAT RAW MEAT but at least don't go past dat any meat that is past legandary or mythic

 

[egiuh]

DONT EAT RAW MEAT but at least don't go past dat any meat that is past legandary or mythic

ngaaaaaa

 

[seriousdude1]

DONT EAT RAW MEAT but at least don't go past dat any meat that is past legandary or mythic

This Nigga

 

[Deleted member 31457]

This Nigga

Bear can

 

[i_love_roosters]

Voted without reading

 

[riju77]

Implementing a new appeal system for warnings could significantly enhance fairness and transparency in decision-making processes. By providing users with a structured mechanism to challenge warnings, platforms can mitigate erroneous penalties and uphold user trust. This approach fosters accountability and ensures that warnings are issued judiciously, contributing to a healthier online environment where users feel heard and respected.

 

[thecel]

Implementing a new appeal system for warnings could significantly enhance fairness and transparency in decision-making processes. By providing users with a structured mechanism to challenge warnings, platforms can mitigate erroneous penalties and uphold user trust. This approach fosters accountability and ensures that warnings are issued judiciously, contributing to a healthier online environment where users feel heard and respected.

ChatGPT bro!

 

[Deleted member 41390]

im jagging my cawk nigguh

 

[Master]

I like the idea

 

[Clavicular]

I like the idea

Cope, status halo

Its actually a bad idea

 

[Deleted member 31457]

appeals me

 

[Pakicel]

appeals me

Harald @Hardrada didn’t bother with any appeals. He just took what he wanted by force.

 

[Deleted member 67869]

Dnrd

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

dnr

 

[lust]

In short, I am considering the introduction of an appeal system for warnings. This thread is to gauge the receptiveness to the possible change.

What would change?

• Eligibility: Users who received a certain warning level or higher (e.g. 30%), and who meet other specified criteria (e.g. non-repeat offender), can appeal their warnings.
• Appeal Process: Eligible users submit their case through a form, providing details and any supporting evidence.
• Review: The appeal will undergo an independent, anonymous review by staff to ensure fairness and moderator accountability.

Proposed Appeal System Overview:

• Collective Staff Review: Appeals will be reviewed by the entire staff, not limited to the warning issuer.
• Anonymous Staff Voting: Decisions on each appeal will be made through an anonymous staff vote, with options to retract the warning, reduce its percentage, or maintain it as is.

The criteria for eligibility aren't entirely established yet, so it may be subject to some changes.

If you support the change, vote for Option 1. If you prefer the system to stay as it is, vote for Option 2.

mods don't care about appeals

 

[lust]

In short, I am considering the introduction of an appeal system for warnings. This thread is to gauge the receptiveness to the possible change.

What would change?

• Eligibility: Users who received a certain warning level or higher (e.g. 30%), and who meet other specified criteria (e.g. non-repeat offender), can appeal their warnings.
• Appeal Process: Eligible users submit their case through a form, providing details and any supporting evidence.
• Review: The appeal will undergo an independent, anonymous review by staff to ensure fairness and moderator accountability.

Proposed Appeal System Overview:

• Collective Staff Review: Appeals will be reviewed by the entire staff, not limited to the warning issuer.
• Anonymous Staff Voting: Decisions on each appeal will be made through an anonymous staff vote, with options to retract the warning, reduce its percentage, or maintain it as is.

The criteria for eligibility aren't entirely established yet, so it may be subject to some changes.

If you support the change, vote for Option 1. If you prefer the system to stay as it is, vote for Option 2.

1 would work good but some mods are corrupt and will be biased

 

[MoggerGaston]

 

[Clavicular]

 

[Debetro]

This reminds me of August 2023...

 

[MoggerGaston]

This reminds me of August 2023...

Was a great time when everyone was a nazi.

And then they started threatening us with bans.

 

[Deleted member 53646]

Sub Reddit

 

[Alexanderr]

Okay well, I've heard enough. I'll try implementing this this month.