T
TheEndHasNoEnd
No avi halo
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Posts
- 6,545
- Reputation
- 12,929
When we think of forward growth, we usually think of faces that are wide from the side, and compact. We think of recession as long, flat faces. So I believe that a good way to measure forward growth would be to measure the facial depth to height ratio from the side profile.
The measurement goes as the following:
Crop a box with the length being the distance from the nasion until most protrusive part of chin and the width being the distance from the tragus until the length line. You then divide the width by the height and you'll get your facial depth to height (fDHR) ratio.
IDEAL MEASUREMENT IS 1.06-1.07
Reminder: Make sure head posture is the same as the example pic when measuring
Here are some measurements of models/celebrities:
Brad Pitt: 1.093 fDHR
Margot Robbie: 1.125 fDHR
Jordan Barrett: 1.03 fDHR
Sean O'Pry: 1 fDHR
Henry Cavill: 1.06 fDHR
Keep in mind forward growth is mostly developmental, as Margot Robbie has near perfect development and gets the highest I've seen so far. Whereas Barrett isn't so impressive on this albeit having the highest fWHR and midface ratio here (which is mostly genetic).
The measurement goes as the following:
Crop a box with the length being the distance from the nasion until most protrusive part of chin and the width being the distance from the tragus until the length line. You then divide the width by the height and you'll get your facial depth to height (fDHR) ratio.
IDEAL MEASUREMENT IS 1.06-1.07
Reminder: Make sure head posture is the same as the example pic when measuring
Here are some measurements of models/celebrities:
Brad Pitt: 1.093 fDHR
Margot Robbie: 1.125 fDHR
Jordan Barrett: 1.03 fDHR
Sean O'Pry: 1 fDHR
Henry Cavill: 1.06 fDHR
Keep in mind forward growth is mostly developmental, as Margot Robbie has near perfect development and gets the highest I've seen so far. Whereas Barrett isn't so impressive on this albeit having the highest fWHR and midface ratio here (which is mostly genetic).
Last edited: