New rating system- FDS

[sergeant blackpill]

I propose we start a new rating system that mimicks how females would rate guys (anonymously when there's no fear of retaliation and to avoid virtue signaling)

The new rating system is therefore called FDS and i think you know what that stands for.
The FDS-scale goes from 1-3
1.0-2.5 is the subhuman tier
2.6-2.8 is the normie-tier
2.9-3.0 FDS is chad
As you can see the subhuman range covers more than half of the scale, the concept being that women think 80% of guys are subhuman. What we consider a 6.5-7/10 is what females would rate as average, because actual average joes simply never even catch their eyes, that's why they think 6.5-7 is plain because that's the lowest attractiveness where they actually start noticing a guy.

 

[ANDALUSIAN_JOCK]

By 2023 PSL scale will be binary numbers.

 

[Deleted member 13197]

the 80 percent thing is not true

 

[Mongrelcel]

Out new scale should be the top 20% split into 10 categories - so a 0 on a scale would mean youre a top 79% male, 5 would mean top 90%m and 10 would be perfection

Or maybe we could look at top 30% instead of 20%, because a top 30% man is still a HTN, its not over for him yet.

Everyone below the scale, should focus on their personality

 

[Selinity]

Women have their own looksmaxxing forums, and some of them mirror looksmax.me very closely with entire sub0forums dedicated to surgery and many threads on female attractiveness, body halo, etc..

Their goal is not to ascend, they want to looksmax their way into the fashion/modelling industry.

From there I've learnt that the rating system which they use is much more in-depth than our own.
They've completely abandoned numbers and use 'tiers'

In descending order they go,
S TIER
A TIER
B TIER
C TIER
D TIER
E TIER

Within these 6 'tier's they have sub-divisions, making the rating system far more nuanced than our own.

S1 (PURE S-TIER) S2 (MID-LEVEL S-TIER) S3 (BARELY HITTING S-TIER)

Because of this they rate themselves on a scale with 18 different looks levels for you to be at.

 

[Growth Plate]

S TIER
A TIER
B TIER
C TIER
D TIER
F TIER

Fixed

 

[lutte]

We don't need more autistic rating scales

 

[Selinity]

Fixed

They don't have an 'f' tier because 'no-one is truly ugly,' but they do use 'f-tier' as an insult from time-to-time, kind of like how we call eachother subhumans.

But it's really rare to see, and any of their looks scales or 'aesthetic discussion' threads completely exclude the idea of an 'f' tier.

 

[Deleted member 7044]

only system that has any actual meaning is the normie scale anyway

 

[Deleted member 11748]

We don't need more autistic rating scales

we do

 

[NeoDandi]

Women have their own looksmaxxing forums, and some of them mirror looksmax.me very closely with entire sub0forums dedicated to surgery and many threads on female attractiveness, body halo, etc..

Their goal is not to ascend, they want to looksmax their way into the fashion/modelling industry.

From there I've learnt that the rating system which they use is much more in-depth than our own.
They've completely abandoned numbers and use 'tiers'

In descending order they go,
S TIER
A TIER
B TIER
C TIER
D TIER
E TIER

Within these 6 'tier's they have sub-divisions, making the rating system far more nuanced than our own.

S1 (PURE S-TIER) S2 (MID-LEVEL S-TIER) S3 (BARELY HITTING S-TIER)

Because of this they rate themselves on a scale with 18 different looks levels for you to be at.

Link a women version of this website

 

[Selinity]

Link a women version of this website

here's one of them:
mybeautyconsultant.net

 

[Selinity]

I am not gonna lie, the women's looksmaxxing forums aren't as high-iq as ours.
They're still discovering the body halo JFL.

They're so fucking primitive.
They also laugh at us and say we've gay men since we worship Sean O'pry even though they have numerous threads dedicated to him JFL

 

[zeke714]

This but:

Gigachad
Chad
Chadlite

HTN
Normie
LTN

Subhuman

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

here's one of them:
mybeautyconsultant.net

Thanks man let the mission begin

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

This but:

Gigachad
Chad
Chadlite

HTN
Normie
LTN

Subhuman

Just saw this. This works very well.

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

Out new scale should be the top 20% split into 10 categories - so a 0 on a scale would mean youre a top 79% male, 5 would mean top 90%m and 10 would be perfection

Or maybe we could look at top 30% instead of 20%, because a top 30% man is still a HTN, its not over for him yet.

Everyone below the scale, should focus on their personality

How do you think this compares with the wheat waffel video here posted (and was he talking about smv?)? In that he said, once at 8 and above, its a completely differemt category and all are chads to an extent. I’m only concerned in terms of instant attractiveness to women around the world (worldwideappeal).

 

[Mongrelcel]

How do you think this compares with the wheat waffel video here posted (and was he talking about smv?)? In that he said, once at 8 and above, its a completely differemt category and all are chads to an extent. I’m only concerned in terms of instant attractiveness to women around the world (worldwideappeal).

I dont know what video you are talking about, but I think that women only feel actual sexual desire for men that are 70% and up.
If a woman is with a man below 70%, you can be sure that there are other factors that made her choose the guy - personality, convinience, she might have low esteem, he might provide for her etc...

Basically, if you cannot get one night stands, that means your looks are too low, and you will always have to compensate somehow.

You can either call the top 30% men and the rest subhumans, or you can call the top 30% chads and the rest men. Its just names, but the point is the same.

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

I dont know what video you are talking about, but I think that women only feel actual sexual desire for men that are 70% and up.
If a woman is with a man below 70%, you can be sure that there are other factors that made her choose the guy - personality, convinience, she might have low esteem, he might provide for her etc...

Basically, if you cannot get one night stands, that means your looks are too low, and you will always have to compensate somehow.

You can either call the top 30% men and the rest subhumans, or you can call the top 30% chads and the rest men. Its just names, but the point is the same.

Okay got it. I’m also by the wya talking abiut this video:

 

[Mongrelcel]

Okay got it. I’m also by the wya talking abiut this video:

jfl that man is not 4/10

 

[RoundHouse]

I propose we start a new rating system that mimicks how females would rate guys (anonymously when there's no fear of retaliation and to avoid virtue signaling)

The new rating system is therefore called FDS and i think you know what that stands for.
The FDS-scale goes from 1-3
1.0-2.5 is the subhuman tier
2.6-2.8 is the normie-tier
2.9-3.0 FDS is chad
As you can see the subhuman range covers more than half of the scale, the concept being that women think 80% of guys are subhuman. What we consider a 6.5-7/10 is what females would rate as average, because actual average joes simply never even catch their eyes, that's why they think 6.5-7 is plain because that's the lowest attractiveness where they actually start noticing a guy.

pure autism

 

[zeke714]

Number system is retarded

 

[Blackgymmax]

I am not gonna lie, the women's looksmaxxing forums aren't as high-iq as ours.
They're still discovering the body halo JFL.

They're so fucking primitive.
They also laugh at us and say we've gay men since we worship Sean O'pry even though they have numerous threads dedicated to him JFL

No surprise. Women have infinite smv no matter what they look like so they have no direction as to what actually looks good.

 

[Selinity]

No surprise. Women have infinite smv no matter what they look like so they have no direction as to what actually looks good.

It was honestly disappointing to see tbh.
I have an account on one of them--maybe I should make a super detailed post exposing them to the other parts of blackpill like jaw pill, eye pill, etc..

 

[one job away]

Women have their own looksmaxxing forums, and some of them mirror looksmax.me very closely with entire sub0forums dedicated to surgery and many threads on female attractiveness, body halo, etc..

Their goal is not to ascend, they want to looksmax their way into the fashion/modelling industry.

From there I've learnt that the rating system which they use is much more in-depth than our own.
They've completely abandoned numbers and use 'tiers'

In descending order they go,
S TIER
A TIER
B TIER
C TIER
D TIER
E TIER

Within these 6 'tier's they have sub-divisions, making the rating system far more nuanced than our own.

S1 (PURE S-TIER) S2 (MID-LEVEL S-TIER) S3 (BARELY HITTING S-TIER)

Because of this they rate themselves on a scale with 18 different looks levels for you to be at.

it doesnt matter how man tiers you have ... by that logic psl has over 100 tiers... 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 .... or even more 4.11 4.12

the best rating system is normie, htn, chadlite with either low tier, or high tier or dead on cuz that's what matters. everything more "accurate" is bs