9499449930203049
Gold
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2024
- Posts
- 758
- Reputation
- 546
‘every 100 mg is 11% increase!’
the study was conducted on mice in the 1930s without any modern calorimetry, controls, or standardized methodology of study.
the study actually states it ‘1 mg / kg / =11% increase’ but then subsequently says 2 mg per kg is 25%.
Then PubMed extrapolated this data to the 100 mg ingested is 11%, which they mention in passing in the source
they then go onto say there is significant individual variation
I mean it works but there’s no way of knowing
Maybe a bunch of us leannpillers need to get together and track our intake, calories and weight and do the math ourselves
anyway tldr no one knows what tis shi does
the study was conducted on mice in the 1930s without any modern calorimetry, controls, or standardized methodology of study.
the study actually states it ‘1 mg / kg / =11% increase’ but then subsequently says 2 mg per kg is 25%.
Then PubMed extrapolated this data to the 100 mg ingested is 11%, which they mention in passing in the source
they then go onto say there is significant individual variation
I mean it works but there’s no way of knowing
Maybe a bunch of us leannpillers need to get together and track our intake, calories and weight and do the math ourselves
anyway tldr no one knows what tis shi does
