Nordics are an entirely different race from Meds, and Meds ARE NOT White.

omg, nobody with that face features do have such black eyes, that eyes are not european, im gonna explain you a little bit how it works, having pretty eyes is good, those can be from different colours, blue eyes is not a halo itself, you can have pretty eyes without blue colour.
Thats not what he meant, point is if everything is equal then blue eyes would always mog, same for light hair. Its based on contrast, low contrast is a highly dismorphic trait in males, and the opposite is true for women. Makeup works by increasing contrast in women heavily so it makes them more feminine
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: tinderhacker, Deleted member 17872, Deleted member 13787 and 1 other person
What are they then? Don’t they have origins near the Black Sea?
Theyre indo europeans... And the north of the black sea has nothing to do with arabs, even if they had originated there
 
Thats not what he meant, point is if everything is equal then blue eyes would always mog, same for light hair. Its based on contrast, low contrast is a highly dismorphic trait in males, and the opposite is true for women. Makeup works by increasing contrast in women heavily so it makes them more feminine
so black eyes sexy in women?
 
YOu will never in your life provide an ounce of proof supporting this.
Theres 0 reason to believe theyre asian
Most of slavland is literally in Asia. A lot of polinas and Natashas have gook features that bleed through their white features. The reason why moustache man tried to delete them was because they were not true whites. Even mfs from the 1930s knew Slavs r basically hapas.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
exact opposite of what i just showed in this thread

nordics are depigmented amerindians, meds are depigmented middle easterners
Even coon said nordid type in scandnavia was some depigmented med type.

Thats clear
Nordics have the highest iq in europe,
They are stronger but not smarter, since all scientists and shiet come from uk and south euro. only geniuses from nordics were abel and bohr and bohr was jewish.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872 and XtrovertNTnormalfag
Most of slavland is literally in Asia.
And gooks are in eastern eurasia. point here being?
Also slavland is virtually all west of the urals, which is europe
A lot of polinas and Natashas have gook features that bleed through their white features.
No they dont.
The reason why moustache man tried to delete them was because they were not true whites.
Wrong
Even mfs from the 1930s knew Slavs r basically hapas.
Nobody thought that.
 
Even coon said nordid type in scandnavia was some depigmented med type.
Ive just shown you in the very thread why thats not true. Meds have fucking nothing to do with the central asians who evolved blonde hair
They are stronger but not smarter, since all scientist and shiet come from uk and south euro. only geniuses from nordics were abel and bohr and bohr was jewish.
UK = nordic
 
And gooks are in eastern eurasia. point here being?
Also slavland is virtually all west of the urals, which is europe

No they dont.

Wrong

Nobody thought that.
1674408223820
 
so black eyes sexy in women?
Yes, pale skin with rosy cheeks, brown eyes and dark brown hair is very high contrast. Historically the most attractive women in the world were caucasian women, they were described as raven hair, black eyes and milk white skin, with rosy cheeks (from estrogen flushing). All in all peak contrast. And earlier in the arab slave trade most valued women were the persian and caucasian ones also cause of these features, while nordic blonde women were hated
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17872, the BULL and sub5inchcel
MENA and Southern Europeans aren't the same but they are some similarities

There are some MENA like Italians, Greeks and very few Balkaners and Islands (Malta, Sicily, Cyprus, etc) that have a lot of ancestry from West Asia (Levant+Anatolia+Caucasus) and Turks/Levantines and Maghrebis have ancestry from Europe, but it ends there.

Spanish people are even closer genetically to Swedes and Russians than they are to Moroccans.

It's just that Europeans and MENA and to a lesser degree, central Asia are all extremely closer related people. They're like comparing Koreans to Vietnamese
 
They're halo for cuckers from third world countries like you maybe, in first world countries a hot babie with brown eyes will be chosen over a blue eyed cucker.
In tinder it's full of blue eyed women, i don't even care anymore about the eyes, it's common as fuck, 40-50% of them have blue green eyes
I'm from England. You also completely missed the point I was making.
 
1.) Nordic genes for depigmentation come from Central Asia, not Europe or West Asia (where the Mediterranean race lived). The first population to carry these genes was phylogeneticaly connected to Amerindians, not Meds. No tested remains in West Eurasia have had blond hair genes prior to 8,000 years B.C. In central Asia blond hair is at least 16,000 years old.







"Phenotypic analysis shows that Afontova Gora 3 carries the derived rs12821256 allele associated with blond hair color in Europeans, making Afontova Gora 3 the earliest individual known to carry this derived allele.[15]"

2.) Mediterraneans lack the genes for lactose tolerance and tall stature which differentiate Nordics from Mediterraneans. These genes, like the genes for blond hair, come from north Central Asia, where there are no Meds.




3.) Y-DNA analysis has confirmed that Southwestern Europeans have admixture from Nordics, which they got from Bronze Age and Iron Age invaders. Therefore, any cranial similarities which are not coincidental between Northern and Southern Europeans are entirely due to admixture with Indo-Europeans. Mediterraneans have cranial similarities with the least specialized Nordics (such as Halstatt), while lacking the metabolic genes which truly define the Nordic race and are now traced to its Siberian homeland (lactose tolerance, blond hair).


4.) There are a number of cranial and dental (non-mendelian) dissimilarities between Meds and Nordics that are not reflected in binary metrical measurements.

5.) Northern and Southern Europeans are genetically different from eachother and do not form a single population the way other races (such as East Asians) do.


6.) Northern Europeans have genetic affinities to Amerindians, which is lacking in pure Meds.

7.) Nordics lack any copies of genes for malaria resistance (which Meds have), or susceptibility to Med diseases such as Kaposi's sarcoma. Despite the fact that malaria was, until relatively recently, widespread across Europe from North to South, and West Eurasia.


Tldr: Nordics are highly evolved depigmented Amerindians from Siberia with some Med admixture (among other things), not depigmented Meds.

Meds are depigmented Middle Easterners and who have some Nordic, and other admixtures.
Muh Nordic muh med
 
MENA and Southern Europeans aren't the same but they are some similarities

There are some MENA like Italians, Greeks and very few Balkaners and Islands (Malta, Sicily, Cyprus, etc) that have a lot of ancestry from West Asia (Levant+Anatolia+Caucasus) and Turks/Levantines and Maghrebis have ancestry from Europe, but it ends there.

Spanish people are even closer genetically to Swedes and Russians than they are to Moroccans.

It's just that Europeans and MENA and to a lesser degree, central Asia are all extremely closer related people. They're like comparing Koreans to Vietnamese
Stop making up things, south europeans don't have any north europe ancestry, south europeans are purely south european. North european heritage is not chad worth, that's why you only see slenderman virgin kids from sweden, they're tall but they are not men
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Stop making up things, south europeans don't have any north europe ancestry, south europeans are purely south european. North european heritage is not chad worth, that's why you only see slenderman virgin kids from sweden, they're tall but they are not men
😂 shitskin cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and Deleted member 13787
Stop making up things, south europeans don't have any north europe ancestry, south europeans are purely south european. North european heritage is not chad worth, that's why you only see slenderman virgin kids from sweden, they're tall but they are not men
keep coping
Spaniards have overwhelmingly R1b Ydna which comes from nordic men. North italians and french also have it
That means that all their paternal line is nordic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18522
MENAs and meds invented civilization while nerdics lived in mud huts.
European civilization is based on Ionian Athenian Greek (most MENA like european population) culture and Rome. Even Hitler admitted that.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872, Deleted member 18522 and lil truecel
who gives a fuck about nordics? they never did anything in history.

The vast majority of advances in science and culture in the West was done by non-nordics like meds or alpines. White faggots mock niggers for having no written language when the European explorers arrived there around the 15-16th century, but nordics themselves had no written language either as recently as the 12 century AD! Their system of runes is NOT a language. Nordics are not the core ethnicity of Europe. Nordics are basically a peripheral population of true europe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
BLonde nordic men dominate the world.
Keep crying only gooks love you

Your women like meds and darker hair and tanned skin not pasty pale milk skin with thin blonde hair lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
who gives a fuck about nordics? they never did anything in history.

The vast majority of advances in science and culture in the West was done by non-nordics like meds or alpines. White faggots mock niggers for having no written language when the European explorers arrived there around the 15-16th century, but nordics themselves had no written language either as recently as the 12 century AD! Their system of runes is NOT a language. Nordics are not the core ethnicity of Europe. Nordics are basically a peripheral population of true europe.
Nordic men gave all europeans their languages.
 
MENAs and meds invented civilization while nerdics lived in mud huts.
European civilization is based on Ionian Athenian Greek (most MENA like european population) culture and Rome. Even Hitler admitted that.
I don’t get the fixation on ancient Rome (& Greece). Sure they were the first European civilizations to have a lasting mark on the continent’s culture, but certainly not the only one. Different eras had different regions come into highlight

The Republic of Venice, Hansa cities along the Baltic sea, Iberia and Flanders were flourishing in the middle ages. Britain in the 18-19th centuries. Germany had a huge influent on mainland Europe after uniting in 1871

There’s no single nation that gave Europe it’s current culture, everybody contributed something to it at one point in history
 
  • +1
Reactions: mecmec, Deleted member 21597 and TsarTsar444
keep coping
Spaniards have overwhelmingly R1b Ydna which comes from nordic men. North italians and french also have it
That means that all their paternal line is nordic
Wtf are you talking about, we can't see dna, we don't know it, we know history and history show us that south europeans are pure. They have never been invaded, they are always invaded other countries.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: TsarTsar444
Cope. Slavs r Asian. Now I see why u are a gook lover. Slavs r the only attractive gooks
Its the same reason why gooks favorite mayos are slavs. There's some slight familiarness while still being exotic
 
Its the same reason why gooks favorite mayos are slavs. There's some slight familiarness while still being exotic
Only way just be gook works. It would never work on an actual white woman. I only like Slavs cause it’s the only way to get a white looking Stacey in 2023 without having to jump through all the hoops.
 
I don’t get the fixation on ancient Rome (& Greece). Sure they were the first European civilizations to have a lasting mark on the continent’s culture, but certainly not the only one. Different eras had different regions come into highlight

The Republic of Venice, Hansa cities along the Baltic sea, Iberia and Flanders were flourishing in the middle ages. Britain in the 18-19th centuries. Germany had a huge influent on mainland Europe after uniting in 1871

There’s no single nation that gave Europe it’s current culture, everybody contributed something to it at one point in history
Yeah and the whole mud hut argument is retarded because ofcourse civilization would originate from the middle east which back then was extremely lush and fertile, enormous agricultural yield which could allow thousands of subhumans to spread their genes which wouldn't be able in northern europe where people lived in harsh conditions where your hunt decided your faith, it made natural selection decide that the more tall and higher iq people lived more likely, while agricultural ensured subhumans could live on. Europeans dominate the planet exactly cause of this hardship that made them have courage and will to become better
 
more tall and higher iq people lived more likely,
Ones who lived in harsh conditions are physically stronger, as scandinavians dominate strongmen constests, but there are far more geniuses among south euro and jews who had to use their brains more and their bodies less, and as result they became weak manlets.

you can see this outside europe too, nafris are low iq but mog at sports/bodybuilding but ricemen are high iq but shit at sports and bodybuilding.
 
Last edited:
I remember watching the sopranos for the first time. Thought Meadow was ethnic.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: GetShrekt and Deleted member 13787
The irony of this coming from a Slav….
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Ones who lived in harsh conditions are physically stronger, as scandinavians dominate strongmen constests, but there are far more geniuses among south euro and jews who had to use their brains more and their bodies less, and as result they became weak manlets.

you can see this outside europe too, nafris are low iq but mog at sports/bodybuilding but ricemen are high iq but shit at sports and bodybuilding.
Not really, there were many other factors that made the fertile cresent have those advanced civilizations. The most important being the much bigger population, the free time like u said they had in the non harvesting seasons which would be used to build great buildings and monuments. Evolution doesn't work like this, you don't get a higher iq just because you ldar so your body decides to maximise your points in brain powwr instead, this isnt a MMORPG. Evolution happens out of necessity for survival. Europeans during the harsh cold wilderness full with vicious wild animals that haven't yet evolved to be scared of humans like those in Africa, would need to use their brain power to plan ahead every step they will take cause any mistake could cost them dearly. The people of the middle east didn't need this, they had security in their grains and in the free time would have plenty weeks to imagine stuff
 
Not really, there were many other factors that made the fertile cresent have those advanced civilizations. The most important being the much bigger population, the free time like u said they had in the non harvesting seasons which would be used to build great buildings and monuments. Evolution doesn't work like this, you don't get a higher iq just because you ldar so your body decides to maximise your points in brain powwr instead, this isnt a MMORPG. Evolution happens out of necessity for survival. Europeans during the harsh cold wilderness full with vicious wild animals that haven't yet evolved to be scared of humans like those in Africa, would need to use their brain power to plan ahead every step they will take cause any mistake could cost them dearly. The people of the middle east didn't need this, they had security in their grains and in the free time would have plenty weeks to imagine stuff
Look at jews, the only reason they are smart is because they lived in a condition which required high cognitive functions. they weren't being chased by animals and shit.
 
Last edited:
I don’t get the fixation on ancient Rome (& Greece). Sure they were the first European civilizations to have a lasting mark on the continent’s culture, but certainly not the only one. Different eras had different regions come into highlight

The Republic of Venice, Hansa cities along the Baltic sea, Iberia and Flanders were flourishing in the middle ages. Britain in the 18-19th centuries. Germany had a huge influent on mainland Europe after uniting in 1871

There’s no single nation that gave Europe it’s current culture, everybody contributed something to it at one point in history
And all of these cultures are based on Athens and Rome.
They were not just "first European civilizations to have a lasting mark on the continent’s culture", they were very foundations of that culture upon which everything else is based.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Look at jews, the only reason they are smart is because they lived in a condition which required high cognitive functions.
Thats not the actual reason for this, there is a much more deeper history behind this, but if i want to dumb this down, its because after jews got resettled to europe and north africa during the Roman Empire, and later during Christianity and Islam, they were the onlt group that was allowed to pursue banking, secular learning etc cause it was forbiden to do these stuff in christian and muslim faiths. Over the centuries all jews descend from these kind of professions cause they were the only ones who could do them, not being forbiden by their religion
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Thats not the actual reason for this, there is a much more deeper history behind this, but if i want to dumb this down, its because after jews got resettled to europe and north africa during the Roman Empire, and later during Christianity and Islam, they were the onlt group that was allowed to pursue banking, secular learning etc cause it was forbiden to do these stuff in christian and muslim faiths. Over the centuries all jews descend from these kind of professions cause they were the only ones who could do them, not being forbiden by their religion
That's litterally what i said but you said it with little detail and bigger words.
 
That's litterally what i said but you said it with little detail and bigger words.
No i thought you meant way back in ancient times, im talking here how all jews were literally forced to work in those high iq fields, so only the most capable iq jews would gain enogh wealth and make bigger families resulting in darwinian eugenics, resulting in todays jews being descended from these more successful families.
 
And all of these cultures are based on Athens and Rome.
They were not just "first European civilizations to have a lasting mark on the continent’s culture", they were very foundations of that culture upon which everything else is based.
No, European culture is based around three things:

1) antiquity (Greece and Rome)

2) Abrahamic mythology ( Judeo - Christianity)

3) Paganism & vernacular traditions of the different ethnicites


Antiquity is only one of the three

Take for example architecture; renainnasance and claccisim does take Roman and Greek ideas of aesthetics as it’s foundation, on the other hand gothicism does not. Romanticism delves into the middle ages and takes gothicism as it’s inspiration, no antique aesthetics in sight. Art nouveau straight up goes against the rules of classicism, instead it incorporates vernacular motiffs

They are all disctinctly European, yet not all of them are based on ancient Roman culture.
 
Hey man... stop being racist against curries...
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787

Similar threads

C
Replies
41
Views
1K
lassebasse
lassebasse
Debetro
Replies
147
Views
9K
Debetro
Debetro
B
Replies
27
Views
2K
BrahminBoss
BrahminBoss
womanfearer
Discussion 0% turnover jfl
Replies
49
Views
4K
truecel12
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top