M
moze
Platinum
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2024
- Posts
- 1,029
- Reputation
- 502

Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They do rotate the orbitals by a bit but it is minimal and the problem is that you get asymmetry and a wider septum.View attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
Wider septum yea maybe but most of the expansion with fme is nearly 100% symmetrical especially on the zygos.They do rotate the orbitals by a bit but it is minimal and the problem is that you get asymmetry and a wider septum.
Since fme is new i bet that it is expensive.Wider septum yea maybe but most of the expansion with fme is nearly 100% symmetrical especially on the zygos.
Wider septum yea maybe but most of the expansion with fme is nearly 100% symmetrical especially on the zygos.
Yea its very expensive.15k usd not worth it for that moneySince fme is new i bet that it is expensive.
the problem with these expanders is that u often already got asymmetry if you got a narrow palate and expanding it will just make the asymmetry even worseWider septum yea maybe but most of the expansion with fme is nearly 100% symmetrical especially on the zygos.
Do you know which expander this is?View attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
That looks like a huge improvement in eye area and not minimal whatsoeverDoing this only for minimal improvement in eye area is not worth it imo i am just talking about possiblities
this is the only which which moves things upwards all the other expander( except custom marpe in some cases)cause some downward movementDo you know which expander this is?
Yea maybe i am talking in terms of cost.very expensive for that much improvement.if you got uars or something its worth itThat looks like a huge improvement in eye area and not minimal whatsoever
Yea maybe i am talking in terms of cost.very expensive for that much improvement.if you got uars or something its worth itThat looks like a huge improvement in eye area and not minimal whatsoever
the problem with these expanders is that u often already got asymmetry if you got a narrow palate and expanding it will just make the asymmetry even worse
Where is the force being placed upwards located exactly? Since if you move the posterior palate upwards you will achieve downwards growth but if you move the anterior palate forward you will achieve upward growth. It looks like FME is placed in the middle of the palate rather than the anterior and posterior which isn’t ideal if you want upward movement. If FME was placed anteriorly it would be ideal for upward movement but it isn’t.Fme(facegenic midface expander)
this is the only which which moves things upwards all the other expander( except custom marpe in some cases)cause some downward movement
Its not about where it is located.downward movement is due to resistance from other bones.as there is more tads in fme it is possible to move things upwards…Where is the force being placed upwards located exactly? Since if you move the posterior palate upwards you will achieve downwards growth but if you move the anterior palate forward you will achieve upward growth. It looks like FME is placed in the middle of the palate rather than the anterior and posterior which isn’t ideal if you want upward movement. If FME was placed anteriorly it would be ideal for upward movement but it isn’t.
Yes it is. If you push the posterior maxilla upward you’ll get a downward occlusion planeIts not about where it is located.downward movement is due to resistance from other bones.as there is more tads in fme it is possible to move things upwards…
Placing the appliance in the middle would not cause downward movement as you thinkYes it is. If you push the posterior maxilla upward you’ll get a downward occlusion plane
Yea I know I just said it’s not ideal that’s all. Since anterior upward movement would be better. Rep all my posts broPlacing the appliance in the middle would not cause downward movement as you think
OkeyYea I know I just said it’s not ideal that’s all. Since anterior upward movement would be better. Rep all my posts bro
My guy how is 6mm littleView attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
My guyView attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
0 difference irlThat looks like a huge improvement in eye area and not minimal whatsoever
How are you jfling me on my own scan bruhThat looks like a huge improvement in eye area and not minimal whatsoever
You do know the max is 10mm for 2a right?View attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
I’m not a dicom expert but are you sure that the slides used are identicalView attachment 3546412
Changes are minimal in this coz they expanded very little would be more if expanded more than 10mm
No its possible i thinkI’m not a dicom expert but are you sure that the slides used are identical
Because it looks like even the upper third changed (which makes zero sense)
Right. I saw some fugly results from patients with EASE they all had elongated faces after the procedure. MSE, MARPE, SARPE I guess not better than EASE. FME seems to work not only widening but also raise the facial bones a little. This has to do because the screws are all set in the palate and they have lock screw mechanism that's why it's superior than Ease, MSE etc.Fme(facegenic midface expander)
this is the only which which moves things upwards all the other expander( except custom marpe in some cases)cause some downward movement
No its possible i think
Who elseIs this you in the cbct?
You do know the max is 10mm for 2a right?
My guy
0 difference irl
you are saying that you got 0% difference irl?Who else
View attachment 3556486
Eyes became noticeably wider
Looks like this guy got ipd and pfl improvementsyou are saying that you got 0% difference irl?
Yes people overthing expansion, i did it for my biteyou are saying that you got 0% difference irl?
Maybe coz she got good breathing space with fmeRight. I saw some fugly results from patients with EASE they all had elongated faces after the procedure. MSE, MARPE, SARPE I guess not better than EASE. FME seems to work not only widening but also raise the facial bones a little. This has to do because the screws are all set in the palate and they have lock screw mechanism that's why it's superior than Ease, MSE etc.
Despite that this patient is foremost looking better after FME I don't understand why his (her?) septum has not been surgically corrected. It's very crooked.
how much did you expandYes people overthing expansion, i did it for my bite
I doubt this because even my (one of the best expansions) had only 1mm change in the zygomatics (width increase).Looks like this guy got ipd and pfl improvements
6mmhow much did you expand
I see… so how did dr newaz got noticeable change and some other patients i asked got noticeable difference too
Ive seen almost everybodys scans; and dr newaz is older so he wont get as great skeletal expansion (i have 5mm skeletal from 6mm activation. Have not seen anybody get ipd or pfl changesI see… so how did dr newaz got noticeable change and some other patients i asked got noticeable difference too
I double checked my ipd also with the scans, 0 change whatsoeverIve seen almost everybodys scans; and dr newaz is older so he wont get as great skeletal expansion (i have 5mm skeletal from 6mm activation. Have not seen anybody get ipd or pfl changes
I mean look at the photo above in that u can see that his eyes got widenI double checked my ipd also with the scans, 0 change whatsoever
Very hard to compare pictures, could be focal length, lighting etc. What i do know is that at 19, with 5-6mm skeletal i uave not seen a ipd change. So i would assume 38 year old Dr. Newaz would not experience ipd change given the ratio of activation to skeletal. But who knows maybe he did get indeed get it. But we cannot know until he posts scans proving such.I mean look at the photo above in that u can see that his eyes got widen
It's clearly visible that his IPD has increased. Not only that his nose is more straight and he has better projected cheeks. He improved at leat two points. FME is the shit. Ease and other crap will be history soon.I mean look at the photo above in that u can see that his eyes got widen
Omg why does everybody think his ipd changedIt's clearly visible that his IPD has increased. Not only that his nose is more straight and he has better projected cheeks. He improved at leat two points. FME is the shit. Ease and other crap will be history soon.
I don't debate with you. The IPD has slightly changed also the under eye support.Omg why does everybody think his ipd changed. If you check the scans you can see there is no ipd change