Beetlejuice
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Posts
- 25,450
- Reputation
- 34,785
The 5.1 one is not a good study,there are some good NBP stretched length studies,stretched NBP comes close to the NBP if measured properly.Lol damn, so I was actually right about the 1" fatpad being average. Actually didn't know, was just a random figure I was throwing out.
Just JFL at dick copers at this point tho. They'll cite the invalid "meta-analysis" and claim average BPEL is 5.1". Which would imply average NBPEL is 4". Does anyone here seriously believe that? Literally just rope at that point.
95% of studies don't spesify whether BPEL or NBPEL was even used. A lot of people have used this opportunity to just assume BPEL on every study, unless otherwise stated. Calcsd and all those calculators does the same too.
Sure, BPEL is more "scienfitic", so I don't doubt that it's used, but I suspect a lot of the studies that give smaller results are NBPEL. If thye aren't NBPEL, then they're basically NBPEL anyways, because measured IRL with weak erection, lying on your back, ruler barely shoved into the bone is basically a NBPEL measurement compard with you sitting at home measuring your max erection after edging for 20 minutes, in the optimal position, and stabbing yourself with a ruler.
These one from Turkey is a very good one,random sample size from the military with 1000 guys,average was 13,7cm(9cm-19cm).
Penile length and somatometric parameters: a study in healthy young Turkish men
The purpose of this study was to determine average penile length and to investigate the relationship between penile length and somatometric parameters in a group of young, healthy Turkish men. A total of 1132 men were included in the study. The ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Last edited: