Nutrition is probably the most interesting thing

But my advice now is to download an Ai with access to the internet such as Co-pilot, or Gemini and Start asking questions like "What are the health benefits to X Food? How might X Food be unhealthy? Are there any studies that prove Y? How was that study conducted?"
I don’t think it’s smart to rely on ai when it comes to diet

Ai doesn’t know how to properly read studies
 
  • +1
Reactions: |Daddy_Zygos|
I don’t think it’s smart to rely on ai when it comes to diet

Ai doesn’t know how to properly read studies
Ai is very good at giving you general knowledge and pointing you to specific studies when required.

When you read those studies, Ai is useful for explaining terms and things you need to know to understand the study. It's also extremely useful for fact checking information in a study, because sometimes authors will lie or intentionally leave out information.

But when it comes to nutrition, no human has the time to read every study. You have to rely on Ai to a degree. If you ask a question like "What's the glycemic index of carrots", to Co-pilot, you have no reason to doubt its answer and require reading a study for it. Or, what are the health benefits of "broccoli"?

If you want to read studies on top of it, you can, and I do, but you have to develop intuition about when it's a good idea to read the study and when you can trust the Ai (Or google search or whatever). Do NOT trust youtubers or other content creators.

The important thing here is time efficiency because you physically can not read every study on nutrition.
 
  • +1
Reactions: |Daddy_Zygos| and ey88
They didn't evolve the toxins for humans. Let's take spinach for example.

It's toxins protect against being eaten by insects, some small mammals like rabbits and rodents, and birds. But mainly insects. In these animals it causes digestive discomfort and reduces nutrient absorbtion.

But not humans because our liver can filter out the toxins.

An animals defenses are never universal. There are always counter measures in other species. One animal evolves a defense, and another evolves a way to neutralize it.

It's why the stomach acid of of vultures kills almost all parasites, but the stomach acid of dogs or humans which is a hundred times lower does not, but still kills more types of parasites than a herbivore's stomach acid.



It's all about quantities and ratios.

But let's take Sulforaphane for example. It protects against cancer. You will find it ONLY in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli. It's not in meat or fruit.

Sulforaphane is anti-cancer, anti-inflammation, protects against neuro-degenerative diseases, and boosts the production of anti-oxidants. Not all anti-oxidants are the same btw, because of their size and density they pool up in different areas of the body.

Or Chlorophyll which helps in binding for detoxification. Found in broccoli and not found in meat at all. It's also an anti-oxidant which you want diversity in because they have different effects on the body.
What else would you advise to not consume AT ALL, on top of that
What is ideal diet to you guys
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
no nutrition for my genetics
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ey88
What is ideal diet to you guys
It depends on your biology and genetics.

It also depends on your goals, muscle mass, longevity, energy, cognition, etc. The human body, and life in general is full of biological trade-offs. There is no "best" it depends on your goals and values.
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and ey88
It depends on your biology and genetics.

It also depends on your goals, muscle mass, longevity, energy, cognition, etc. The human body, and life in general is full of biological trade-offs. There is no "best" it depends on your goals and values.
Are vegetables and grains useful though? Goatis' points confuse me.
 
I eat whatever nowadays
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
The longest lived populations of humans eat mostly plants but some meat. Though I believe, life style and low stress is a bigger factor than what they eat.
The longest lived population haven't lived in a zero sum world nor globalisation and their eating habits arent soley tied to health but economics and the amount of reasources they had near them so i dont think looking at past society are even worth it ;even if their hunter gathers like most carnivores glorify , due to their small numbers (they take up less reasourse so each person can be more picky) they still had to work with the food they had to their disposale (hence ethnic groups being more suspetiable to deficincies as their bodies have microevolved for their diet) and them not understanding what food actually is (their fucking cavemen) so can easily misinterpert affects or can be blind to negative affects(no such thing as a stone MRI).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15778

@noodlelover @Never Get Up any other forums with high iq people like you we could replace​

 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
  • JFL
Reactions: ey88

Similar threads

R1PPer
Replies
153
Views
1K
R1PPer
R1PPer
Nikaa
Replies
2
Views
64
Nikaa
Nikaa
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
4
Views
80
ey88
ey88
whitebitchslayer
Replies
9
Views
144
Alias!
Alias!
Vermilioncore
Replies
6
Views
63
Vermilioncore
Vermilioncore

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top