A
AscensionMan98
Luminary
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Posts
- 9,206
- Reputation
- 9,576
Even on a purely military target it would be stupid as the enemy would then consider going a step further, and bombing a much more potent target like a huge capital city to send a message, and the chaos would be bad.I agree with this- would legit be ending the world for no good reason
Also war morale would disintegrate. The elites want to send as many men to the meat grinder as possible. While drones and artillery can kill you , if your hiding out in your cave like the afghan people your fine. But a nuclear strike means even if you survive , the fall out would eventually kill you and not to mention wind can spread it much further , so more people get sick. Birth defects were their for decades after the nukes in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now imagine the whole world getting that shit on a constant basis. Would be a catastorphe.
The elites want chaos, but not to the point their comfortable hedonistic lifestyles of fucking young jb and doing coke and spending fuck all on anything they want ends forever. A few years they might ride in their bunker, but risking mass nuclear fall out even in a global war just doesn't seem something the elites would actively go for.
Far more effective is just conscripting tons of men in war, and the fucked up supply chains that occur In global wars would result in economic fall outs massive civlil unrest and likely a civil war, as well as naturally food shortages and famines as food can't be imported properly. This achieve their population decline results.