Odds on Russia using nukes within the next 2 years

I agree with this- would legit be ending the world for no good reason
Even on a purely military target it would be stupid as the enemy would then consider going a step further, and bombing a much more potent target like a huge capital city to send a message, and the chaos would be bad.

Also war morale would disintegrate. The elites want to send as many men to the meat grinder as possible. While drones and artillery can kill you , if your hiding out in your cave like the afghan people your fine. But a nuclear strike means even if you survive , the fall out would eventually kill you and not to mention wind can spread it much further , so more people get sick. Birth defects were their for decades after the nukes in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now imagine the whole world getting that shit on a constant basis. Would be a catastorphe.

The elites want chaos, but not to the point their comfortable hedonistic lifestyles of fucking young jb and doing coke and spending fuck all on anything they want ends forever. A few years they might ride in their bunker, but risking mass nuclear fall out even in a global war just doesn't seem something the elites would actively go for.

Far more effective is just conscripting tons of men in war, and the fucked up supply chains that occur In global wars would result in economic fall outs massive civlil unrest and likely a civil war, as well as naturally food shortages and famines as food can't be imported properly. This achieve their population decline results.
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover and Deleted member 15778
since the oligarchs took away like 80-90% of the russian military budget the past decades
This, given Russians are getting their arse kicked by Ukraine, it's clear the Russian military budget was used to fund Putin's and his corrupt friends' palaces and yachts
 
  • +1
Reactions: XtrovertNTnormalfag, Deleted member 15778 and AscensionMan98
NATO won't do anything
NATO won't step in unless it has to. The current help its given in military equipment and financial aide has helped ukraine greatly, as well as the incompetency of the russian army due to so much corruption taking away from having good tech.

One tactical nuke and their going full send.
 
  • +1
Reactions: XtrovertNTnormalfag
The only problem is putin now exposes himself to similar nuclear attacks by other countries , and NATO going full send and intervening would be a complete disaster for russia since the oligarchs took away like 80-90% of the russian military budget the past decades ,meaning their technology is dog shit compared to what america has. They would get completely crushed against far superior american and other countries technology. Sure American politicians swindled billions of dollars, but considering America spent trillions in the past decades on military development its a drop in the bucket.

Here is the SR-71 Blackbird developed the early 1960s, first flight 1966. This was publicly released as a project. Imagine the crazy shit then they didn't show the public, and the insane technology they have NOW 56 years later.
iu


iu


inb4 its fake


The 50s and early 60s were the best years for the ussr. After that it has been all downhill
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscensionMan98
What are the odds of this happening tbh?

I don't want to waste my last moments wagecucking if I'm just gonna get blasted out anyway

Another question, I currently live about 30 miles outside London. Am I within the blast radius or will I suffer 3rd degree burns until my med gymcelled chadlite manlet body succumbs to the heat and radiation

Cheers
Head to Africa tbh

Only place that likely will be safe if it comes to nukes tbh tbh
 
I doubt they russia would use nukes, I also doubt that America or its allies would nuke russia if russia nuked ukraine

Alot of people think that once nukes start flying it's back to the stoneage and everyone is fucked

I disagree, to an extent

A good strategy for russia in my opinion if it wanted to use nukes would be to

A : nuke the ukraine with small nukes to wreck them and then when america nukes russia do plan b

B: do nothing don't retaliate,

this might seem weak and stupid but actually it would work to do nothing because it would psychologically disarm the us nuclear capability not physically of course but psychologically, because if the us or Britain nuked russia and russia did nothing back they would definitely not nuke them again because there advisor's and military would refuse the order since they would be in a quit while ahead mentality not risk doing it again because guaranteed retaliation

If I was putins general this is what I would advise, of course if amerca kept nuking the then nah shit russia should retaliate

But if they nuke russia and russia nukes them back it ends in a nuclear exchange with no winner if russia does nothing the USA would be psychologically disarmed leaving russia to continue to pump ukraine with nukes and us not being able to do much about it

Yes russia coped a nuke or two but it won't change the outcome of the war with ukraine

When russia beats ukraine it would claim victory over the us even though the us suffered 0 casualties and russia a million

The us failed to achieve its adjectives to save ukraine and was ultimately the one that backed down giving russia place to claim victory

It would make the us look bad too
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15778
I doubt they russia would use nukes, I also doubt that America or its allies would nuke russia if russia nuked ukraine

Alot of people think that once nukes start flying it's back to the stoneage and everyone is fucked

I disagree, to an extent

A good strategy for russia in my opinion if it wanted to use nukes would be to

A : nuke the ukraine with small nukes to wreck them and then when america nukes russia do plan b

B: do nothing don't retaliate,

this might seem weak and stupid but actually it would work to do nothing because it would psychologically disarm the us nuclear capability not physically of course but psychologically, because if the us or Britain nuked russia and russia did nothing back they would definitely not nuke them again because there advisor's and military would refuse the order since they would be in a quit while ahead mentality not risk doing it again because guaranteed retaliation

If I was putins general this is what I would advise, of course if amerca kept nuking the then nah shit russia should retaliate

But if they nuke russia and russia nukes them back it ends in a nuclear exchange with no winner if russia does nothing the USA would be psychologically disarmed leaving russia to continue to pump ukraine with nukes and us not being able to do much about it

Yes russia coped a nuke or two but it won't change the outcome of the war with ukraine

When russia beats ukraine it would claim victory over the us even though the us suffered 0 casualties and russia a million

The us failed to achieve its adjectives to save ukraine and was ultimately the one that backed down giving russia place to claim victory

It would make the us look bad too
This seems like the most likely scenario.

There could be other U.S, responses to nuking keive that don't involve nuking a russian city. But whatever it is, Russia could just take over Ukraine at that point and then work on rebuilding whatever the U.S. destroyed. This does seem like their best option, especially since nukes as soon as possible will save them money they would have spent on a longer more drawn out war.

Alright, I'm going to stop worrying about nukes on U.S. soil. It is highly unlikely as every one is doing strategies they believe will benefit their countries in the long run.
 
What are the odds of this happening tbh?

I don't want to waste my last moments wagecucking if I'm just gonna get blasted out anyway

Another question, I currently live about 30 miles outside London. Am I within the blast radius or will I suffer 3rd degree burns until my med gymcelled chadlite manlet body succumbs to the heat and radiation

Cheers
THE SAME ODDS AS ME GETTING A DARK HAIRED UPPER MIDDLE INCOME 16 YO EMO HQIT GF
 
This seems like the most likely scenario.

There could be other U.S, responses to nuking keive that don't involve nuking a russian city. But whatever it is, Russia could just take over Ukraine at that point and then work on rebuilding whatever the U.S. destroyed. This does seem like their best option, especially since nukes as soon as possible will save them money they would have spent on a longer more drawn out war.

Alright, I'm going to stop worrying about nukes on U.S. soil. It is highly unlikely as every one is doing strategies they believe will benefit their countries in the long run.
100 %

Yea if anything russia is stronger by having nukes but but not retaliating against America with them

And the dumbest thing america could do is nuke russia because that would help russia disarm the us nuclear arsenal on a psychological level ( not physical of course) by russia not retaliating
Also after that event russia would go all out on ukraine since us disarmed

So as dumb as this sounds amerca playing it's ace and nuking russia would actually help russia, ( if russia is smart about it)


By not nuking russia it keeps the russians guessing


Amercas strength is not playing its ace but having an ace
 
What are the odds of this happening tbh?

I don't want to waste my last moments wagecucking if I'm just gonna get blasted out anyway

Another question, I currently live about 30 miles outside London. Am I within the blast radius or will I suffer 3rd degree burns until my med gymcelled chadlite manlet body succumbs to the heat and radiation

Cheers
No more than 10%. It's pretty unlikely and it would likely be a tactical nuke on the battlefield.
 
I support Putin.

Get out of the shithole U.K before it's too late and move to the countryside, some island or mountains.

Armageddon/WW3: Final battle between the forces of evil and good, before the end of this world.

Muslimmax before it's too late, buddy boyo.
 
The same as the odds of you becoming a chad through surgeries within the next 10 years
 
Low. Ive been dissapointed in china and russia recently.
 
Very high. Russia even has a mechanism where the computer launches a nuke automatically if it detects a nuke aimed at russia. I cannot express how over it is to be on the wrong side of a war with these faggots
Talk about paranoia JFL 😂🤣 so even if it’s a fake nuke aka “just a prank bro” Russia will unleash their Babushka Slavic Nuka cola and we all die
 
That mechanism only launches nukes if there is already nuclear destruction on russias territory not if the nuke is "aimed" at them jfl. Its called "Dead mans hand" for a reason as it implicates that everyone in russia is already dead and it auto-launches all of the 6666 nukes on all of the major cities in the world thus annihilating the entire earth (more or less)
Lmfao 🤣 Russia took the ultimate “if I die I’m takin you all with me, humanity will also dissapear like mother russia” I wonder how the world will evolve once this were to happen. I imagine all animals will grow with immunities to Radiation, shit will be like fallout but no humans
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao and MikeMew'sBitch

Similar threads

D
Replies
19
Views
2K
greetingsfrommumbai
greetingsfrommumbai
dreamcake1mo
Replies
56
Views
15K
Joshrc
Joshrc
Deleted member 10413
Replies
25
Views
10K
Nihonz9
Nihonz9

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top