.🇹🇩.
Kraken
- Joined
- May 5, 2020
- Posts
- 8,345
- Reputation
- 12,319
After visiting more than 20 Euro countries and meeting people of so many different cultures and communities I've come to an agreement with myself that only Scandinavian/Germans/Anglos are white. The Rest all look swarthy non european af.
I've seen people from Romania, bulgaria, north macedonia, serbia, kosovo, albania, hungary and slovakia who look more Indian than me. They have very dark and swarthy complexion, very short, very very short with poor frames. I had to do research on why they look so much like me ( a brown skinned man). why do their features resemble me so much. And i finally found out, its because of gypsy migrations over thousand years that this has happened.
Gypsies trace back their ancestry to low caste north indians (with high component of ASI (ANCESTRAL SOUTH INDIAN)) who were bought as slaves to turkey by turkic rulers of India and they werent allowed to go back to india, rather go west to europe. and thats how they entered europe and mixed with the natives.
Today almost everyone from the above countries have some amount of South Asian in them. They wont agree with it but they wont agree with looking at their GED match either = which a dutch or swedish person wont hesitate to do so.
most people from these countries look indian. even the light skinned ones look like bleached indians. or upper caste Indians. thats because every indian has some amount of abo in them. the stock that went from india was the one with highest amount of abo.
Whenever you will call these people Indian - they will always get angry and defend themselves with 1000 paragraphs whereas if you call a swede or dutch person an indian - he will just laugh it off. which basically proves my point.
The same thing goes for mediterranean people like spaniards, french, italians, greeks and yugoslavians. Though they dont look straight up indian but they dont look european either. even the ones with blue eyes and blonde hair dont look white. they look very Arab to me. now i researched on this and found out that due to slavery and trade from africa to europe through medditerranean sea for thousands of years caused lots of meds to have black influence to their genetics. which is no surprise since half of the med was once ruled by turkic and arab empires like ottoman and Umayyad caliphate and due to trade for thousands of years with them - mixing is bound to happen.
the same turks and arabs who themselves have indian influence (with indian comes ASI - Ancestral south indian abo component)
90% turks and arabs has some amount of indian in them (ranges from 2 to all over 80%)
Not only this but all turks have mongoloid and arab component in them. so they themselves are far too far to claim muh european.
saw lots of hungarians, poles, finns and slavs with monolids. which is no surprise since genghis khan also invaded slavic homeland which is modern day slavic countries like ukraine, moldova, belarus, etc etc.
as a matter of fact. russia is literally an asian country. which makes slavs an asian ethnicity despite majority of them residing in the european subcontinent. I know its crazy.
lots of slavs and meds have indian ancestry as well. but not quite as much as they have armenoid ancestry. inb4 muh turks and armenians are white. muh iranians are white. lmao
the truth is son. they all look like indians. and aint nothing wrong with looking indian. since all 100% europeans have yamnaya ancestors anyways, the same yamnaya who were indians themselves.
what do you think? should indians claim 1/3rd of europe since they are indians anyways.
I've seen people from Romania, bulgaria, north macedonia, serbia, kosovo, albania, hungary and slovakia who look more Indian than me. They have very dark and swarthy complexion, very short, very very short with poor frames. I had to do research on why they look so much like me ( a brown skinned man). why do their features resemble me so much. And i finally found out, its because of gypsy migrations over thousand years that this has happened.
Gypsies trace back their ancestry to low caste north indians (with high component of ASI (ANCESTRAL SOUTH INDIAN)) who were bought as slaves to turkey by turkic rulers of India and they werent allowed to go back to india, rather go west to europe. and thats how they entered europe and mixed with the natives.
Today almost everyone from the above countries have some amount of South Asian in them. They wont agree with it but they wont agree with looking at their GED match either = which a dutch or swedish person wont hesitate to do so.
most people from these countries look indian. even the light skinned ones look like bleached indians. or upper caste Indians. thats because every indian has some amount of abo in them. the stock that went from india was the one with highest amount of abo.
Whenever you will call these people Indian - they will always get angry and defend themselves with 1000 paragraphs whereas if you call a swede or dutch person an indian - he will just laugh it off. which basically proves my point.
The same thing goes for mediterranean people like spaniards, french, italians, greeks and yugoslavians. Though they dont look straight up indian but they dont look european either. even the ones with blue eyes and blonde hair dont look white. they look very Arab to me. now i researched on this and found out that due to slavery and trade from africa to europe through medditerranean sea for thousands of years caused lots of meds to have black influence to their genetics. which is no surprise since half of the med was once ruled by turkic and arab empires like ottoman and Umayyad caliphate and due to trade for thousands of years with them - mixing is bound to happen.
the same turks and arabs who themselves have indian influence (with indian comes ASI - Ancestral south indian abo component)
90% turks and arabs has some amount of indian in them (ranges from 2 to all over 80%)
Not only this but all turks have mongoloid and arab component in them. so they themselves are far too far to claim muh european.
saw lots of hungarians, poles, finns and slavs with monolids. which is no surprise since genghis khan also invaded slavic homeland which is modern day slavic countries like ukraine, moldova, belarus, etc etc.
as a matter of fact. russia is literally an asian country. which makes slavs an asian ethnicity despite majority of them residing in the european subcontinent. I know its crazy.
lots of slavs and meds have indian ancestry as well. but not quite as much as they have armenoid ancestry. inb4 muh turks and armenians are white. muh iranians are white. lmao
the truth is son. they all look like indians. and aint nothing wrong with looking indian. since all 100% europeans have yamnaya ancestors anyways, the same yamnaya who were indians themselves.
what do you think? should indians claim 1/3rd of europe since they are indians anyways.
@LooksOrDeath @pashtun @Chadethnic101 @PapaGremlin @RabidRosaries @Chadpreetmaybe @sub5inchcel @pianoboy123 @Lihito @reptiles @MewMaxxing @PrinterAndFaxMachin @CFW432 @David Rothschild @Bhupal57 @Xangsane @justinzayn @enchanted_elixir @JamesHowlett @Chinacurry @Chadeep @currylightskin @thereallegend @Crusile @11gaijin @StormlitAqua @PubertyMaxxer @volcelfatcel @ItsOVERBuddyBoyos @FETTY1738 @Solar @Ambrose @earthwindandfire @buckchadley31 @ScoobyCurry420 @ForeverRecession @VedicAryan33 @jaw_is_law @ScoobyCurry420 @Nameless_Sunflower @Dystopian @Biiyo03
Last edited:
