Opinions on my ceph scan

moneyfundsmoneys

moneyfundsmoneys

Iron
Joined
May 24, 2026
Posts
24
Reputation
12
For those who are lazy to open quick summary

SNA: 86.8
SNB: 81.4
MPA: 25.7
Gonial Angle: 119.7

 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: iamgoingtoascend, Zavar and ArtisMagna28
Looks quite similar to mine, id say get genio and rhinoplasty
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
Figures largely within normal ranges.
WeDoCeph suspects maxillary prognathism + flat chin but the rest figures within normal to above average ranges.
if it bothers me ill prob do genio
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
UPDATE: Got my ceph analyzed by a lab for free (PM if you want the source)

88.1 SNA and 80 SNB

might seriously consider lefort 1 setback
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
negative roi. just do retractive braces on upper. setback would fuck up your nose and airway
whats the best between advancing ccw the mandible and retractive braces to correct 88 sna
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
whats the best between advancing ccw the mandible and retractive braces to correct 88 sna
Isn't just your radix recessed, causing your high SNA? That's a common case—I've seen underbites with an SNA over 90. I cant see your ceph, could you upload it again?
 
Isn't just your radix recessed, causing your high SNA? That's a common case—I've seen underbites with an SNA over 90. I cant see your ceph, could you upload it again?
 

I mean, you have Class I occlusion even Class I molars. If I were you, I would just get a genioplasty and call it a day. You won't ascend by even 0.1 PSL from any setback or anything on your maxilla, and even mandible advancement wouldn't be life changing. You have a very open mentolabial angle, which a genio would deepen, benefiting you along with giving you more chin projection. Plus, you don't have to deal with braces and don't risk numbness. And if you're really considering a setback, look at intraoperative videos of a maxillary downfracture. And I doubt that 88 SNA is accurate. the earlier 86 was probably right
 
  • +1
Reactions: moneyfundsmoneys
I mean, you have Class I occlusion even Class I molars. If I were you, I would just get a genioplasty and call it a day. You won't ascend by even 0.1 PSL from any setback or anything on your maxilla, and even mandible advancement wouldn't be life changing. You have a very open mentolabial angle, which a genio would deepen, benefiting you along with giving you more chin projection. Plus, you don't have to deal with braces and don't risk numbness. And if you're really considering a setback, look at intraoperative videos of a maxillary downfracture. And I doubt that 88 SNA is accurate. the earlier 86 was probably right
first things first thanks for the effort and I agree that pursuing maxillary setback is more of a headache. Furthermore, both of my parents have microgenia so I always knew that genioplasty was the thing I needed the most. About the 88 SNA, AudaxCeph AI landmark ing gave me 86 while the lab/university I contacted sent me back 88 but whatever it is I hope it's 86. thanks for the help doe
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
Also with no doubt the primary movement of the genioplasty would be horizontal, but should I ask for vertical or is that unecessary?
 
  • +1
Reactions: czechpsl
Also with no doubt the primary movement of the genioplasty would be horizontal, but should I ask for vertical or is that unecessary?
Hard to tell without simulating the cut and having information about facial height after, but I like moving the genio in the same vector as the mandible to avoid step-off. I would aim for a 2.5:1 chin-to-philtrum ratio after that, as it's more masculine
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • LeanByDecemer
Back
Top