moneyfundsmoneys
Iron
- Joined
- May 24, 2026
- Posts
- 24
- Reputation
- 12
For those who are lazy to open quick summary
SNA: 86.8
SNB: 81.4
MPA: 25.7
Gonial Angle: 119.7
SNA: 86.8
SNB: 81.4
MPA: 25.7
Gonial Angle: 119.7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
For those who are lazy to open quick summary
SNA: 86.8
SNB: 81.4
MPA: 25.7
Gonial Angle: 119.7
WeDoCeph suspects maxillary prognathism + flat chin but the rest figures within normal to above average ranges.Figures largely within normal ranges.
Would the most appropriate action be to reduce the prognathism or to balance the chin forward?Yeah, SNA is above average, implying mild prognathism.
negative roi. just do retractive braces on upper. setback would fuck up your nose and airwaymight seriously consider lefort 1 setback
whats the best between advancing ccw the mandible and retractive braces to correct 88 snanegative roi. just do retractive braces on upper. setback would fuck up your nose and airway
Isn't just your radix recessed, causing your high SNA? That's a common case—I've seen underbites with an SNA over 90. I cant see your ceph, could you upload it again?whats the best between advancing ccw the mandible and retractive braces to correct 88 sna
Isn't just your radix recessed, causing your high SNA? That's a common case—I've seen underbites with an SNA over 90. I cant see your ceph, could you upload it again?
my badno i ment ceph as before unedited
my bad
first things first thanks for the effort and I agree that pursuing maxillary setback is more of a headache. Furthermore, both of my parents have microgenia so I always knew that genioplasty was the thing I needed the most. About the 88 SNA, AudaxCeph AI landmark ing gave me 86 while the lab/university I contacted sent me back 88 but whatever it is I hope it's 86. thanks for the help doeI mean, you have Class I occlusion even Class I molars. If I were you, I would just get a genioplasty and call it a day. You won't ascend by even 0.1 PSL from any setback or anything on your maxilla, and even mandible advancement wouldn't be life changing. You have a very open mentolabial angle, which a genio would deepen, benefiting you along with giving you more chin projection. Plus, you don't have to deal with braces and don't risk numbness. And if you're really considering a setback, look at intraoperative videos of a maxillary downfracture. And I doubt that 88 SNA is accurate. the earlier 86 was probably right
Hard to tell without simulating the cut and having information about facial height after, but I like moving the genio in the same vector as the mandible to avoid step-off. I would aim for a 2.5:1 chin-to-philtrum ratio after that, as it's more masculineAlso with no doubt the primary movement of the genioplasty would be horizontal, but should I ask for vertical or is that unecessary?