ℤ𝕪𝕘𝕠
Fallen Angel
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2026
- Posts
- 2,602
- Reputation
- 5,414
To begin with, I want to clarify that I am neutral in this debate, as I believe that, regardless of race, anyone can look good
So, from my neutral standpoint, I’ll give you my take on this "debate".
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the most globalized standard of beauty, and the one that enjoys the most success in the real world, is the white standard.
And no, this isn't a made up statistic;
The visuals are enough.
A white man with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race man with a top 1% appearance
A white woman with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race woman with a top 1% appearance
Regardless of whether a person is mixed or white, statistically speaking, they will prefer a white partner over a mixed one.
But why do you say "mixed" if they are clearly ethnic?
This is the point I wanted to get to.
Many people have no idea how to tell the difference between someone who is truly ethnic and someone who is mixed race
Mixed Race:
Ethnic:
The difference is clear: just because someone has a light skin doesn't automatically mean they are "ethnic", you're mistaken. In the case of someone like Vito Basso, European phenotypic traits clearly predominate, and it makes no sense to assume he belongs to an ethnic minority simply because he possesses a few ethnic features.
To sum up, the point I want to make with this thread is that:
1- People have always been mistaken about what "ethnic" means.
2- Globally, the phenotypic traits of white people are viewed as more aesthetic and more desirable.
But anyway, what is your opinion on this debate?
@Mai Sakurajima. @Jordan Barrett @j1gga @Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @slow
So, from my neutral standpoint, I’ll give you my take on this "debate".
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the most globalized standard of beauty, and the one that enjoys the most success in the real world, is the white standard.
And no, this isn't a made up statistic;
The visuals are enough.
A white man with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race man with a top 1% appearance
A white woman with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race woman with a top 1% appearance
Regardless of whether a person is mixed or white, statistically speaking, they will prefer a white partner over a mixed one.
But why do you say "mixed" if they are clearly ethnic?
This is the point I wanted to get to.
Many people have no idea how to tell the difference between someone who is truly ethnic and someone who is mixed race
Mixed Race:
Ethnic:
The difference is clear: just because someone has a light skin doesn't automatically mean they are "ethnic", you're mistaken. In the case of someone like Vito Basso, European phenotypic traits clearly predominate, and it makes no sense to assume he belongs to an ethnic minority simply because he possesses a few ethnic features.
To sum up, the point I want to make with this thread is that:
1- People have always been mistaken about what "ethnic" means.
2- Globally, the phenotypic traits of white people are viewed as more aesthetic and more desirable.
But anyway, what is your opinion on this debate?
@Mai Sakurajima. @Jordan Barrett @j1gga @Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @slow
