• ```
    ● LIVE NOW
    MASTER IS LIVE 🔥
    Master, founder of Looksmax.org, is streaming live on KICK
    ▶ WATCH THE STREAM
    GTFIH 🗿
    ```

People don't understand the meaning of "ethnic" | JBE Analysis

ℤ𝕪𝕘𝕠

ℤ𝕪𝕘𝕠

Fallen Angel
Joined
Jul 2, 2026
Posts
2,604
Reputation
5,421
To begin with, I want to clarify that I am neutral in this debate, as I believe that, regardless of race, anyone can look good

So, from my neutral standpoint, I’ll give you my take on this "debate".

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the most globalized standard of beauty, and the one that enjoys the most success in the real world, is the white standard.

And no, this isn't a made up statistic;
The visuals are enough.


A white man with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race man with a top 1% appearance
Screenshot 20260919 173716


A white woman with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race woman with a top 1% appearance
Screenshot 20260919 174137


Regardless of whether a person is mixed or white, statistically speaking, they will prefer a white partner over a mixed one.

But why do you say "mixed" if they are clearly ethnic?
This is the point I wanted to get to.

Many people have no idea how to tell the difference between someone who is truly ethnic and someone who is mixed race


Mixed Race:
Screenshot 20260919 174756


Ethnic:
Mukasa kakonge v0 00pd9p6rdhzf1


The difference is clear: just because someone has a light skin doesn't automatically mean they are "ethnic", you're mistaken. In the case of someone like Vito Basso, European phenotypic traits clearly predominate, and it makes no sense to assume he belongs to an ethnic minority simply because he possesses a few ethnic features.

To sum up, the point I want to make with this thread is that:
1- People have always been mistaken about what "ethnic" means.
2- Globally, the phenotypic traits of white people are viewed as more aesthetic and more desirable.

But anyway, what is your opinion on this debate?

@Mai Sakurajima. @Jordan Barrett @j1gga @Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @slow
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, superchud90000 and 4 others
did you type this on google docs?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, ESR and 3 others
dnr for the moment
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, ESR and 2 others
anyone non-white. Including mixed race are ethnics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, tansel and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, ESR and 2 others
To begin with, I want to clarify that I am neutral in this debate, as I believe that, regardless of race, anyone can look good

So, from my neutral standpoint, I’ll give you my take on this "debate".

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the most globalized standard of beauty, and the one that enjoys the most success in the real world, is the white standard.

And no, this isn't a made up statistic;
The visuals are enough.


A white man with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race man with a top 1% appearance
View attachment 5665705

A white woman with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race woman with a top 1% appearance
View attachment 5665726


Regardless of whether a person is mixed or white, statistically speaking, they will prefer a white partner over a mixed one.

But why do you say "mixed" if they are clearly ethnic?
This is the point I wanted to get to.

Many people have no idea how to tell the difference between someone who is truly ethnic and someone who is mixed race


Mixed Race:
View attachment 5665773

Ethnic:
View attachment 5665775

The difference is clear: just because someone has a light skin doesn't automatically mean they are "ethnic", you're mistaken. In the case of someone like Vito Basso, European phenotypic traits clearly predominate, and it makes no sense to assume he belongs to an ethnic minority simply because he possesses a few ethnic features.

To sum up, the point I want to make with this thread is that:
1- People have always been mistaken about what "ethnic" means.
2- Globally, the phenotypic traits of white people are viewed as more aesthetic and more desirable.

But anyway, what is your opinion on this debate?

@Mai Sakurajima. @Jordan Barrett @j1gga @Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @slow
@ESR @Gravitas
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan and ESR
An ethnic with colored eyes aka “mix” gonna always mog
Cuz he is taking the ethnic coloring wich is great and the white features :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan, tansel and 1 other person
An ethnic with colored eyes aka “mix” gonna always mog
Cuz he is taking the ethnic coloring wich is great and the white features :Comfy:
would you choose an ethnic woman over a white woman?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., SilvioMoltisantiDan and ESR
would you choose an ethnic woman over a white woman?
Each person has his preference and type
U can’t make the rule
But for me the high t I will fk then both :feelsyay:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima. and SilvioMoltisantiDan
To begin with, I want to clarify that I am neutral in this debate, as I believe that, regardless of race, anyone can look good

So, from my neutral standpoint, I’ll give you my take on this "debate".

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the most globalized standard of beauty, and the one that enjoys the most success in the real world, is the white standard.

And no, this isn't a made up statistic;
The visuals are enough.


A white man with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race man with a top 1% appearance
View attachment 5665705

A white woman with a top 1% appearance next to a mixed race woman with a top 1% appearance
View attachment 5665726


Regardless of whether a person is mixed or white, statistically speaking, they will prefer a white partner over a mixed one.

But why do you say "mixed" if they are clearly ethnic?
This is the point I wanted to get to.

Many people have no idea how to tell the difference between someone who is truly ethnic and someone who is mixed race


Mixed Race:
View attachment 5665773

Ethnic:
View attachment 5665775

The difference is clear: just because someone has a light skin doesn't automatically mean they are "ethnic", you're mistaken. In the case of someone like Vito Basso, European phenotypic traits clearly predominate, and it makes no sense to assume he belongs to an ethnic minority simply because he possesses a few ethnic features.

To sum up, the point I want to make with this thread is that:
1- People have always been mistaken about what "ethnic" means.
2- Globally, the phenotypic traits of white people are viewed as more aesthetic and more desirable.

But anyway, what is your opinion on this debate?

@Mai Sakurajima. @Jordan Barrett @j1gga @Mansur @SilvioMoltisantiDan @slow
imo should depend of what porcentage is the mixed to be considered ethnic
Jeremy meeks obv a clearly case with ethnicity dominating "60% nigger/40% european"
Vito basso European dominating etc
"70% european/30% ethnic"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima., tansel, ESR and 1 other person
imo should depend of what porcentage is the mixed to be considered ethnic
Jeremy meeks obv a clearly case with ethnicity dominating "60% nigger/40% european"
Vito basso European dominating etc
"70% european/30% ethnic"
But what i meant was that attractive people of "ethnic" backgrounds are mixed race
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mai Sakurajima. and SilvioMoltisantiDan
  • +1
Reactions: tansel, Mai Sakurajima. and ℤ𝕪𝕘𝕠

Similar threads

PG4BINX
Replies
11
Views
51
PG4BINX
PG4BINX
_MVP_
Replies
4
Views
28
Brava
Brava
braydenx.x
Replies
14
Views
86
braydenx.x
braydenx.x
hopingforluck
Replies
9
Views
96
Itzsimpledude
Itzsimpledude

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top