People underestimate the gap between MTN and HTN.

[forevermirin]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.



But everyone just picks some random point above MTN as the threshold for HTN - I blame this on confusing terminology. Someone who looks better than an MTN is most likely still an MTN, but it's hard to actually fix a point to mark the transition over to HTN.

The most logical point of approx 1 SD leaves just about 15% people as HTN+ - which might make sense for OLD but in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

This isn't really an issue as long as yo understand the flimsy nature of these categorizations, and the only other alternative is a percentile score. "Bro you have a 77th percentile face".

 

[alriodai]

Finally someone said it brother

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside
Yet people here sometimes hand out HTN rating like it's normal

I think the percentile score is good too, most people I see here rated HTN are just glorified MTNs who take some good pictures and sometimes are just plain LTNs that I don't understand why get even above MTN (just because of anorexic hollow cheeks)

A chadlite is actually so rare that you can only find them on Instagram and rarely rarely IRL

A reminder, an HTN in motion real life looks so good you might rate him as chad IRL, but pictures and videos are so different you might underrate him

 

[BrahminBoss]

Been saying for ages

 

[forevermirin]

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside

agree but this isn't what i said lol. HTN mogs 85% people outside which is still pretty rare, but you could still see a couple at a busy grocery store. I'd say chadlite is 99th percentile.

 

[forevermirin]

Been saying for ages

you also spout a lot of other bullshit so it probably got overlooked

 

[Deleted member 24789]

Bro u overrate the most lol

 

[Kamui]

Finally someone said it brother

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside
Yet people here sometimes hand out HTN rating like it's normal

I think the percentile score is good too, most people I see here rated HTN are just glorified MTNs who take some good pictures and sometimes are just plain LTNs that I don't understand why get even above MTN (just because of anorexic hollow cheeks)

A chadlite is actually so rare that you can only find them on Instagram and rarely rarely IRL

A reminder, an HTN in motion real life looks so good you might rate him as chad IRL, but pictures and videos are so different you might underrate him

Agreed, frauding is extremely easy online and in photos that you post to social media

 

[sub5outsider]

from average ok to attractive

 

[forevermirin]

Bro u overrate the most lol

yes, because of the reason i mentioned.

in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

so instead of sounding like a retard saying "bro you are mtn but you mog 70% people" i'll just rate them HTN and call it a day.

 

[Deleted member 24789]

Finally someone said it brother

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside

No, this is called a chad

Htn is not rare, that why its called high tier normie.

 

[Graham]

Htn is not rare, that why its called high tier normie.

Yeah, this is why looksmax ratings are scuffed. It's in the name. It's meant to be a normal occurrence.

 

[Lebgfinal]

based thread! i agree with uyou!!

 

[St.TikTokcel]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.

View attachment 2236589

But everyone just picks some random point above MTN as the threshold for HTN - I blame this on confusing terminology. Someone who looks better than an MTN is most likely still an MTN, but it's hard to actually fix a point to mark the transition over to HTN.

The most logical point of approx 1 SD leaves just about 15% people as HTN+ - which might make sense for OLD but in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

This isn't really an issue as long as yo understand the flimsy nature of these categorizations, and the only other alternative is a percentile score. "Bro you have a 77th percentile face".

MTN on the left, HTN on the right. It is as simple as that.

 

[Deleted member 20631]

You’re either attractive to the majority of girls or you aren’t, any looks level below HTN is meaningless

 

[copemaxxedturanid]

MTN on the left, HTN on the right. It is as simple as that.
View attachment 2236622View attachment 2236623

gigachad on left and subhuman on right

 

[St.TikTokcel]

gigachad on left and subhuman on right

>roach
Comment checks out

 

[Detective]

htn is chadlite irl

 

[Graham]

Is how I interpret it IRL.

Obviously on looksmax / OLD its more like:

But honestly, it's mainly more exaggerated just for humor / meme (just because the top 1% have an insane advantage, doesn't mean MTNs still aren't getting matches / dates).

 

[Deleted member 29581]

 

[Deleted member 17244]

Been saying for ages

highest iq Ishaan on .org

 

[Deleted member 17244]

MTN on the left, HTN on the right. It is as simple as that.
View attachment 2236622View attachment 2236623

where am I

 

[forevermirin]

You’re either attractive to the majority of girls or you aren’t, any looks level below HTN is meaningless

stupid take because being attractive to a majority of 51% girls and 99% girls is very different. Also being attractive to 51% girls is much closer to being attractive to 49% girls - so thats quite an arbitrary cutoff point.

 

[Deleted member 24789]

MTN on the left, HTN on the right. It is as simple as that.View attachment 2236623

Hes ipdcel

Jfl

 

[bleksandre]

where am I

hanging on a rope of skewed distribution

 

[bleksandre]

Hes ipdcel

Jfl

No I am only true IPDcel

 

[Iasacrko]

Looks like @St.TikTokcel was right all along

 

[St.TikTokcel]

where am I

India

 

[Deleted member 24789]

No I am only true IPDcel

His ipd and face structure looks like mine and am considered ipdcel

you must be a cyclops

 

[omarthegoat195]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.

View attachment 2236589

But everyone just picks some random point above MTN as the threshold for HTN - I blame this on confusing terminology. Someone who looks better than an MTN is most likely still an MTN, but it's hard to actually fix a point to mark the transition over to HTN.

The most logical point of approx 1 SD leaves just about 15% people as HTN+ - which might make sense for OLD but in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

This isn't really an issue as long as yo understand the flimsy nature of these categorizations, and the only other alternative is a percentile score. "Bro you have a 77th percentile face".

agreed ppl here give htn ratings out like candy, but in reality 60% of ppl are like mtns and it gets rarer as it deviates from the average

 

[bleksandre]

Still mog tho

His ipd and face structure looks like mine and am considered ipdcel

you must be a cyclops

yeah true

 

[SubSigma]

Anything below mtn is autosubhuman

 

[forevermirin]

Looks like @St.TikTokcel was right all along

like a broken clock

 

[forevermirin]

Anything below mtn is autosubhuman

girls wont be able to tell the difference between 49th and 50th percentiles that well bro. there's a point below which is subhuman for sur ebut that isn't MTN.

 

[Deleted member 29167]

Yeah, this is why looksmax ratings are scuffed. It's in the name. It's meant to be a normal occurrence.

agreed psl ratings are so retarded in general. apparently its supposed to be 1-8 but nobody uses anything outside of 3-6. "but muh autistic distribution" like stfu

if chadLITE is ultra rare to find irl, chad would be literally impossible. but like the whole chad thing was supposed to symbolize a guy who just slays. psl ratings are retarded in general tbh

 

[Deleted member 29167]

retarded thread, but this is why we say weak/mid/strong MTN for example. there aren't really 3 layers of attractiveness

 

[forevermirin]

retarded thread, but this is why we say weak/mid/strong MTN for example. there aren't really 3 layers of attractiveness

does a strong MTN sound closer to MTN or HTN?

 

[Deleted member 29167]

does a strong MTN sound closer to MTN or HTN?

its closer to MTN ofc

but its not too far from weak HTN

 

[forevermirin]

its closer to MTN ofc

but its not too far from weak HTN

that means its closer to HTN. there is no fixed point separating "strong" MTN and "weak" HTN. just confusing terminology thats all.

 

[Deleted member 29167]

that means its closer to HTN. there is no fixed point separating "strong" MTN and "weak" HTN. just confusing terminology thats all.

yeah ur right i guess but weak HTN is not actual HTN

 

[forevermirin]

View attachment 2236722
yeah ur right i guess but weak HTN is not actual HTN

yes thats what im trying to say, and it wouldn't be right to say it's MTN either. If anything, it's more accurate to call it HTN than MTN.

 

[Gone]

View attachment 2236722
yeah ur right i guess but weak HTN is not actual HTN

but then youve just made a new rating between mtn and htn no?

 

[Deleted member 24789]

but then youve just made a new rating between mtn and htn no?

it's retarded as hell


the real rating is ugly > normie > above average > slayer > male model

All the rest is subjectivity and stupidity

 

[Schizomogger]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.

View attachment 2236589

But everyone just picks some random point above MTN as the threshold for HTN - I blame this on confusing terminology. Someone who looks better than an MTN is most likely still an MTN, but it's hard to actually fix a point to mark the transition over to HTN.

The most logical point of approx 1 SD leaves just about 15% people as HTN+ - which might make sense for OLD but in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

This isn't really an issue as long as yo understand the flimsy nature of these categorizations, and the only other alternative is a percentile score. "Bro you have a 77th percentile face".

Good thread, now go get your weekly 5 minutes of social interaction with your mom upstairs

 

[LVZZO]

View attachment 2236635
Is how I interpret it IRL.

Obviously on looksmax / OLD its more like:
View attachment 2236638
But honestly, it's mainly more exaggerated just for humor / meme (just because the top 1% have an insane advantage, doesn't mean MTNs still aren't getting matches / dates).

Looks are deterministic and should follow an absolute approach
A bell curve representing the percentage of people in each lookism category doesn't work for modern race mixed populations
We must only take into consideration population of interest
It won't work if include a representative sample of all the population in your jewed country
For example, include pajeets and roaches in the population sample of Germany and the looks won't follow a bell curve, the subhuman population is greatly increased

A bell curve works if there was no globalization and looks standards were regionalized, or if you only count the endogenous population of European countries
68.26% of people are MTN
13.59% of people are LTN/HTN
2.54% of people are Subhuman/Chads
0.13% of people are Failed abortions/ Gay aliens

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Finally someone said it brother

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside
Yet people here sometimes hand out HTN rating like it's normal

I think the percentile score is good too, most people I see here rated HTN are just glorified MTNs who take some good pictures and sometimes are just plain LTNs that I don't understand why get even above MTN (just because of anorexic hollow cheeks)

A chadlite is actually so rare that you can only find them on Instagram and rarely rarely IRL

A reminder, an HTN in motion real life looks so good you might rate him as chad IRL, but pictures and videos are so different you might underrate him

"Muh HTN 99% percentile"

Nigga stfu

 

[Deleted member 24789]

68.26% of people are MTN
13.59% of people are LTN

No way

 

[longjohnmong]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.

View attachment 2236589

Inaccurate. Of course since the terms don't have any official meaning you can use them to label any way you want, but this graph does not comport with the sense these terms usually take.

 

[longjohnmong]

68.26% of people are MTN

Except go somewhere where you're actually getting a random sample and you'll find this isn't close to being the case. You can even ignore old people and fat people, and most people you count will still be unattractive, not just plain or not attractive.

Best place to look would be yearbook.

 

[Blackgymmax]

Finally someone said it brother

HTN mogs 99% of people facially outside
Yet people here sometimes hand out HTN rating like it's normal

I think the percentile score is good too, most people I see here rated HTN are just glorified MTNs who take some good pictures and sometimes are just plain LTNs that I don't understand why get even above MTN (just because of anorexic hollow cheeks)

A chadlite is actually so rare that you can only find them on Instagram and rarely rarely IRL

A reminder, an HTN in motion real life looks so good you might rate him as chad IRL, but pictures and videos are so different you might underrate him

An htn in pictures looks like a borderline Male model chad irl
Chadlite your confuse it for someone chico tier irl
Full chad looks like photoshop irl

 

[Gone]

And overestimate the gap between HTN and Chadlite.

View attachment 2236589

But everyone just picks some random point above MTN as the threshold for HTN - I blame this on confusing terminology. Someone who looks better than an MTN is most likely still an MTN, but it's hard to actually fix a point to mark the transition over to HTN.

The most logical point of approx 1 SD leaves just about 15% people as HTN+ - which might make sense for OLD but in IRL appeal there will be a big difference between a 50th percentile MTN and a 75th percentile MTN.

This isn't really an issue as long as yo understand the flimsy nature of these categorizations, and the only other alternative is a percentile score. "Bro you have a 77th percentile face".

What percentile am I according to your scale then