D
Deleted member 14693
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Posts
- 36,757
- Reputation
- 65,038
do it
@thenewhebbe
@thenewhebbe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why aren't you vegan then?Don't have any
Just havent thought about the issueWhy aren't you vegan then?
So if you come to the conclusion that its unethical to eat meat you would stop?Just havent thought about the issue
A natty one
I guess but its not only tjat you need to be able to be healthy on itSo if you come to the conclusion that its unethical to eat meat you would stop?
Okay, pedophiles find rape of minors pleasureful, does this mean they be able to do it?Meat is delicious
Accourding to mainstream science it is, wether you believe in that or not is up to you.I guess but its not only tjat you need to be able to be healthy on it
Both on roids and both clearly with a big genetic difference, the first one results are even more impressive if he really achieved this physique with a vegan diet only tbh...
Fuck them animals.do it
@thenewhebbe
A natty one
jfl if you think vegan gains is on roidsBoth on roids and both clearly with a big genetic difference, the first one results are even more impressive if he really achieved this physique with a vegan diet only tbh...
Based beastility should be legalFuck them animals.
do it
@thenewhebbe
Wait not that way!!.Based beastility should be legal
God told me to eat meatOkay, pedophiles find rape of minors pleasureful, does this mean they be able to do it?
Accourding to mainstream science it is, wether you believe in that or not is up to you.
Also you eat junkfood so you aren't healthy either way
why are the healthiest most virile animals in the wild eat meat?
Generally speaking, there's some exceptions here and there but the most genetically fit animals are on top of the food chain. Plus elephants are ugly, they didn't ascend with plants like majestic carniverous cats
Generally speaking, there's some exceptions here and there but the most genetically fit animals are on top of the food chain. Plus elephants are ugly, they didn't ascend with plants like majestic carniverous cats
Ever heard of horse face? you fell for the body halo (and dick pill jfl at including his schlong)
Carnivores on land have a shorter life span + they're smaller than many other animals that don't touch meat.why are the healthiest most virile animals in the wild eat meat?
It's never about living long. A turtle lives 200 years but who the fuck wants to be a turtle? I wanna live like a king both looks wise and behaviourally.Carnivores on land have a shorter life span + they're smaller than many other animals that don't touch meat.
Ever heard of horse face? you fell for the body halo (and dick pill jfl at including his schlong)
A horse is way more energetic and viral than all the carnivores that sleep 15 hours a day.It's never about living long. A turtle lives 200 years but who the fuck wants to be a turtle? I wanna live like a king both looks wise and behaviourally.
yeah and a horse gets enslaved by subhumans literally, cage at his existence.A horse is way more energetic and viral than all the carnivores that sleep 15 hours a day.
Knew your autism would interfere eventually
Because he's viral, strong, useful. Carnivores are useless to us. I guess they're good at gladiator games.yeah and a horse gets enslaved by subhumans literally, cage at his existence.
give me 10 years of thisBecause he's viral, strong, useful. Carnivores are useless to us. I guess they're good at gladiator games.
And when you say that something is metaphysically impossible what exactly do you mean? Most spergs can't seem to define metaphysical modality in any way that doesn't trivialize to logical or physical so let me hear it1. Where some faculty F is natural to a rational agent A, and by nature exists for the sake of some end E (and exists in A precisely so that A might pursue E), then it is metaphysically impossible for it to be bad for A to use F in a manner that fulfills E.
2. The ability to digest and derive nutrition from meat is natural to humans and exists for the purpose of obtaining essential nutrients.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is metaphysically impossible for it to be bad for humans to consume meat in a manner that fulfills their nutritional needs.
Any possible combination the world might have been, it is impossible all of them. It simply cannot be in any.And when you say that something is metaphysically impossible what exactly do you mean? Most spergs can't seem to define metaphysical modality in any way that doesn't trivialize to logical or physical so let me hear it
With this formulation, there isn't even any other modality that it trivializes to, as that is literally just the logical modality. As in the exact definitionAny possible combination the world might have been, it is impossible all of them. It simply cannot be in any.
Say our worlds combination is W1XYZ, then it is impossible in W1XYZ and It is impossible in W2XYZ, and W3XYZ, W4XYZ…. ∞
Btw I don’t accept this argument… it has a terrible consequence that the vast majority of people will unanimously reject.
Logical modality is concerned with logical consistency. Something can be logically consistent yet metaphysically inconsistent because it disrespects the natures of other things. While logical impossibility entails metaphysical impossibility. Metaphysical impossibility doesn’t entail logical impossibility.With this formulation, there isn't even any other modality that it trivializes to, as that is literally just the logical modality. As in the exact definition