Ultimate Subhuman™
Living Happily
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2023
- Posts
- 4,849
- Reputation
- 5,651
Keep in mind they claimed they knew, extensively on the bible & studied it.
"Where does it say in the bible homosexuality is a sin!""Verse Please"
> Gives Verse
"Well its actually a misstranlation, it actually means to lay w/ boy. Its against Pedophilia."
> Said its the KJ Version, Asks which version they used.
"Theres so many issues and misstranslations in that Version." (Dosen't provide version their using)
> Brings up this; multiple translations. Which dosen't include anything about "boy"
> Spews random shit about Roman shit and what they did to change it & demonize
> Explains the verse wouldn't help her argument put the way she did.
"A man is sinning if he has sex with boy. You must kill both.
They should be ashamed. Their sin causes their death. "
If the verse is explicitly talking about Pedophilia, How does it cause their death? I can understand the boy may die, from Anorectal injuries; But it wouldn't cause BOTH. Unless it would be speaking on how Anal sex would be transmitting disease causing both of them to die. Therefore condemning homosexuality. Because it wouldn't be applicable to just man & boy, it would be applicable to man & man.
> Kicks me off the Panel
"Where does it say in the bible homosexuality is a sin!""Verse Please"
> Gives Verse
"Well its actually a misstranlation, it actually means to lay w/ boy. Its against Pedophilia."
> Said its the KJ Version, Asks which version they used.
"Theres so many issues and misstranslations in that Version." (Dosen't provide version their using)
> Brings up this; multiple translations. Which dosen't include anything about "boy"
> Spews random shit about Roman shit and what they did to change it & demonize
> Explains the verse wouldn't help her argument put the way she did.
"A man is sinning if he has sex with boy. You must kill both.
They should be ashamed. Their sin causes their death. "
If the verse is explicitly talking about Pedophilia, How does it cause their death? I can understand the boy may die, from Anorectal injuries; But it wouldn't cause BOTH. Unless it would be speaking on how Anal sex would be transmitting disease causing both of them to die. Therefore condemning homosexuality. Because it wouldn't be applicable to just man & boy, it would be applicable to man & man.
> Kicks me off the Panel