Progression in genetic HEIGHT research (10-40% explained)

Seth Walsh

Seth Walsh

The man in the mirror is my only threat
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Posts
8,650
Reputation
16,537
A large study by the GIANT consortium identified over 12,000 genetic variants influencing height, explaining 10-40% of height variation depending on ancestry. These discoveries, made by analyzing the DNA of 5.4 million people, highlight the impact of increasing sample sizes on understanding traits controlled by multiple genes.

 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and thereallegend
in 40 years they will increase average height by one inch with genome sequencing, meanwhile if you take progesterone and thyroid before giving birth itll prolly make them 120 iq minimum and 6'0 minimum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Krakowski
The study uncovered rare variants affecting skeletal growth. New genes like SUSD5, GLT8D2, LOXL4, FIBIN, and SFRP4 were identified, and particularly, variations in STC2 significantly affected height. The STC2 protein acts as a brake on height, presenting a potential target for treating short stature

 
in 40 years they will increase average height by one inch with genome sequencing, meanwhile if you take progesterone and thyroid before giving birth itll prolly make them 120 iq minimum and 6'0 minimum
Probs a lot more than a 1 inch increase on average lmao. 40 years from now is a long long time away. A lot will happen and I think geneticists will be focused on increasing mental capacity and eliminating diseases.

In real life being 6'0 compared to 6'4 isn't a huge deal like people online are tricked into believing. Sure being shorter is definitely a huge disadvantage but the whole 6'4+ thing is a meme.

What I worry about is what happens when "designer babies" become a thing we see more "Chad & Stacy faces". The world as a whole will have A LOT to answer for then.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NateJacobs and Krakowski
Probs a lot more than a 1 inch increase on average lmao. 40 years from now is a long long time away. A lot will happen and I think geneticists will be focused on increasing mental capacity and eliminating diseases.

In real life being 6'0 compared to 6'4 isn't a huge deal like people online are tricked into believing. Sure being shorter is definitely a huge disadvantage but the whole 6'4+ thing is a meme.

What I worry about is what happens when "designer babies" become a thing we see more "Chad & Stacy faces". The world as a whole will have A LOT to answer for then.
Genome sequencing has done nothing of worth since its inception.
 
Genome sequencing has done nothing of worth since its inception.
You might be thinking of gene editing with CRISPR and you're right; nothing has come out of that, I don't even think static gene editing could alter epigenetic expression to any great extent.

Inducing embryonic stem cells into a pluripotent state where they can differentiate into any three of the germ layers and from there, theoretically become any cell besides the cells of the placenta, can essentially aid in preventing diseases and more. iPSC has already been demonstrated in vitro using Yamanaka Factors and since the embryonic stage is prenatal.
 
Last edited:
You might be thinking of gene editing with CRISPR and you're right; nothing has come out of that, I don't even think static gene editing could alter epigenetic expression to any great extent.

Altering a gene is risky and can lead to phenotypical mutations that can't be foreseen. Using genetics to create identical cells is impressive but it's not what the genome project was about.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seth Walsh
designer babies
only for ultra rich people and this will end the fucking human race,imagine youre a 5 ft 5 indian in 40 years and u see a fucking 7 ft guy that can throw you around like in cyberpunk
 

Similar threads

Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
93
Views
6K
fuktheclout
fuktheclout
Rigged
Replies
143
Views
7K
Brad_
Brad_
Zenis
Replies
89
Views
12K
mbi876
mbi876
D
Replies
26
Views
3K
Deleted member 86409
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top