Proof thats beauty is subjective

william2605

william2605

Luminary
Joined
Mar 16, 2023
Posts
8,565
Reputation
6,374
IMG 1244
 
  • +1
Reactions: valentine, All-American, Anakin. and 2 others
We can all agree Taylor hill is attractive and the foids can agree Matt homer is attractive
 
did not read my foid loves my t60s :FeelsSadDitch::FeelsSadDitch::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
It is subjective to some degree, if u have an guy with attractive features nobody will say "Aww hes ugly" when he clearly is not, same goes for when hes ugly af
 
  • +1
Reactions: Peubert
Dude is on a bp looksmaxx forum and thinks looks are subjective. Have you learned nothing
 
  • +1
Reactions: ineonx, Peubert and william2605
Elab why looks is objective then
delete your fucking account nigg, AND u got a lachowski pfp nigga delete ur account

on everything if i catch u posting again im gonna fly over to Siri Lanka and manually castrate you
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
the guy in the corner looks like this
 

Attachments

  • I%27m_Handsome.webp
    I%27m_Handsome.webp
    36.5 KB · Views: 0
Elab why looks is objective then
Theyre not as “subjective” as people try to make it seem. Obviously people have preferences, like race, but saying looks are subjective are just a cope for ugly people.

Good looking people are good looking, ugly are ugly. Even people with preferences can say if someone is good looking or not, even though they don’t have to be attracted to them
 
  • +1
Reactions: obontw and william2605
Theyre not as “subjective” as people try to make it seem. Obviously people have preferences, like race, but saying looks are subjective are just a cope for ugly people.

Good looking people are good looking, ugly are ugly. Even people with preferences can say if someone is good looking or not, even though they don’t have to be attracted to them
If looks are objective, then you should be able to explain the difference between 9/10 cheekbones and 7/10 cheekbones, considering that both are already attractive.

Objectively, I don't see any clear criterion you can point to that explains why one objectively deserves a 9 while the other only deserves a 7.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: obontw and theblueprints
delete your fucking account nigg, AND u got a lachowski pfp nigga delete ur account

on everything if i catch u posting again im gonna fly over to Siri Lanka and manually castrate you
Elab why is objective and I will accept
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Peubert
If looks are objective, then you should be able to explain the difference between 9/10 cheekbones and 7/10 cheekbones, considering that both are already attractive.

Objectively, I don't see any clear criterion you can point to that explains why one objectively deserves a 9 while the other only deserves a 7.
Normies subconsciously notice these things. They’re aren’t psl autists so they don’t know what it is about their face that’s so striking, but they can notice the difference between a 7 and a 9 what
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
Normies subconsciously notice these things. They’re aren’t psl autists so they don’t know what it is about their face that’s so striking, but they can notice the difference between a 7 and a 9 what
Explain to me what a 9/10 has that a 7/10 doesn't, given that both already have good-looking cheekbones.

You can't objectively measure beauty.

It's only objective when distinguishing between unattractive and attractive. Beyond that, the line is extremely thin—that's where objectivity ends.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Peubert and theblueprints
look at ur avi and tell me if ANYONE would think hes ugly. Now delete ur account
Explain to me what a 9/10 has that a 7/10 doesn't, given that both already have good-looking cheekbones.

You can't objectively measure beauty.

It's only objective when distinguishing between unattractive and attractive. Beyond that, the line is extremely thin—that's where objectivity ends.
 
Explain to me what a 9/10 has that a 7/10 doesn't, given that both already have good-looking cheekbones.

You can't objectively measure beauty.

It's only objective when distinguishing between unattractive and attractive. Beyond that, the line is extremely thin—that's where objectivity ends.
Just how much more pronounced a certain feature is?
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
It's only objective when distinguishing between unattractive and attractive. Beyond that, the line is extremely thin—that's where objectivity ends.
maybe try not to use a.i. to argue for you, retard

and theres still a line, even when its thin
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: william2605 and theblueprints
maybe try not to use a.i. to argue for you, retard

and theres still a line, even when its thin
I think this account is a troll. Dudes been here since 2023 and thinks looks are subjective
 
  • +1
Reactions: Peubert and william2605
I think this account is a troll. Dudes been here since 2023 and thinks looks are subjective
Why you arent able to put why?
Looks is objective in every range ?
7 and 9 are both good looking stop
 

Similar threads

william2605
Replies
71
Views
342
william2605
william2605
william2605
Replies
1
Views
22
realestpatriot
realestpatriot
william2605
Replies
27
Views
130
ICL
ICL
g4rlic
Replies
9
Views
55
iblameloweffort
iblameloweffort
RecessedCels
Replies
2
Views
25
g4rlic
g4rlic

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →