Prove me that God exists

[Mainlander]

 

[lucifer88]

why do i have to prove you shit bro i dont give a fuck about you

 

[cocaine?]

you cant prove it thats why its faith dude

 

[klinefelterlegend]

Spin around very quickly for 30 seconds It might seem dumb but do it itl give you the proof your looking for

 

[Greyascension]

why do i have to prove you shit bro i dont give a fuck about you

Oh hey it's the sexy guy

 

[Greyascension]

why do i have to prove you shit bro i dont give a fuck about you

Oh look sexy mans almost at 1500 posts too. I'll hate on him the next time I see him

 

[lucifer88]

Oh hey it's the sexy guy

oh hey its my future bf ,, hey thwre papa

 

[theRetard]

non-existence does not exist
so god exists

 

[Daddy's Home]

Well.. I tried..

 

[VohnnyBoy]

 

[algerianmogger]

He doesn't exist

 

[vfdke]

1. Cosmological argument
2. Teleological argument (harmony)
3. Moral argument
4. Ontological argument
5. Experimental (practical) argument
6. An argument from the order of consciousness
Literature ( Plato, Thomas Aquinas, Kant, Decartes, Gegel also spinoza)

 

[unstable]

non-existence does not exist
so god exists

nigga you are so weird
since non existence does not exist so that means there is an octopus under my bed as non existence doesn't exist.

 

[theRetard]

nigga you are so weird
since non existence does not exist so that means there is an octopus under my bed as non existence doesn't exist.

i need to make it more clear then.
Octopus under your bfed doesn't exist because it's self-refuting (materially there's no), so as non-existence concept is self refuting as well (it doesn't exist)

 

[unstable]

i need to make it more clear then.
Octopus under your bfed doesn't exist because it's self-refuting (materially there's no), so as non-existence concept is self refuting as well (it doesn't exist)

how is it self refuting, like as if i look under it and don't find an octopus? but still octopus' non existence does not exist.

 

[theRetard]

how is it self refuting, like as if i look under it and don't find an octopus? but still octopus' non existence does not exist.

materially there's no (cuz saying something to be material even though there's no is self refuting), if you imply material premise. god is not supposed to be material

 

[theRetard]

how is it self refuting, like as if i look under it and don't find an octopus? but still octopus' non existence does not exist.

you cant imagine it to be material, just as you cant imagine non existence

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

how can i fucking prove existing some that doesn't exists.....

 

[optimisticzoomer]

non-existence does not exist
so god exists

theRetard
So my 12 inch dick exists?

 

[theRetard]

theRetard
So my 12 inch dick exists?

perhaps

 

[unstable]

materially there's no (cuz saying something to be material even though there's no is self refuting), if you imply material premise. god is not supposed to be material

so material could not exist but something that is not material must exist as non existance is not real.
so lets imagine there is a ghost under my bed ghost is not material so it must exist right?.

 

[Gargantuan]

You can’t even form the question without standing on the thing you’re pretending to doubt. If reality were actually random, directionless, and unconscious, you wouldn’t have stable logic, you wouldn’t have consistent laws, and you wouldn’t have a mind capable of tracking patterns.
Yet you lean on all of that automatically when you ask for proof.

The whole structure you’re relying on: intelligibility, coherence & consciousness already implies a grounding field that isn’t contingent on the universe it generates. Call it whatever you want, but that’s the real meaning of God.
Every alternative collapses. If the laws are just there, you’ve already assumed something timeless holding the whole system together. If consciousness is just an emergent trick, you’ve dodged the gap instead of crossing it.
And if everything is meaningless, then your request for proof dissolves with it.

You can deny the word, but you can’t escape the structure. You’re inside the thing, using its properties to argue against it. At that point, it isn’t something to believe in, it’s literally the ground you’re standing on.

 

[hauntohalic]

if you look around you everything biological has complex systems that humans havent been able to come close to imitating properly with their own inventions so the logical conclusion would be that theres a creator that has made this

 

[BigBallsLarry]

Well.. I tried..

View attachment 4323984

 

[foidletslayer]

Logically god has to exist, without the concept of god humans can’t exist.
Saying god doesn’t exist is self refuting btw ur implying he does exist by saying he isn’t real