PSL "god" females are overhyped

Muh woang :feelsuhh: just shut up an kill yourself already
>0 argument, my win ggs. Pack it up son you're arguments are getting weaker and weaker but keep barking your like a spastic chihuahua barking for its master
 
You know what's uncanny looking is a man at 5'6 :feelskek:
>5'7*

retard thinks id willingly say im this height and act shocked when a low T faggot tries to use it as an insult like a female. You reek of estrogen id get that checked out :feelshah:
 
all that matters is squishiness
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pablomaxx and 0S4MA
You're so disgusting calling me your dog and shit. Like legit vomit inducing.

If you don't think looks are objectively determined then you are, in fact, a retard.
 
You're so disgusting calling me your dog and shit. Like legit vomit inducing.

If you don't think looks are objectively determined then you are, in fact, a retard.
Its objective when it comes to the requirement of compact midface and low facial fat, and I'm limiting this to HTB+ but keep barking mutt everyone one else agreed and your kinda dumb as shit so its safe to say I cbb :ogre:
 
"Hii I'm @0S4MA! These women are all objectively equally attractive. If you fancy one over the other then that's just your pReFer3ncE :feelsuhh::feelsuhh:"
A bright woman
Pexels alipazani 2625122
Images 10
 
"Hii I'm @0S4MA! These women are all objectively equally attractive. If you fancy one over the other then that's just your pReFer3ncE :feelsuhh::feelsuhh:"
View attachment 3085779View attachment 3085780View attachment 3085781
Compact mid face on a roastie, compact mid face on a surgery maxed insta whore, compact midface on an AI enhanced model

proved absolutely nothing :lul: all these women appeal to different guys who prefer averageness or strikingness, they only look varrying in attractiveness to you because of preferences you gained over the years. A guy who likes Asians would say they are all mid to him
 
Compact midface = neoteny?
 
Compact midface = neoteny?
Oh look another retard entered the thread. Well, you've got company now, best of luck with the "intellectual 🤓" discussion :lul::lul:
 
Oh look another retard entered the thread. Well, you've got company now, best of luck with the "intellectual 🤓" discussion :lul::lul:
Imagine getting that emotionally invested on an aspie forum
 
, best of luck with the "intellectual 🤓" discussion :lul::lul:
no luck needed, its now a guaranteed fact since you have conceded, bent over and let me have my way you submissive rat. Eat this ignore while you wipe the cum from your backside I win!!!!!!:ogre:
 
Imagine getting that emotionally invested on an aspie forum
dont mind him he's on his period after getting his argument bent over and raped :feelshah:
 
Yeah baby I got an ignore :feelspanties: ohh yeah I'm fire as of late :whistle:
 
there's a simple explanation for this.


women have far less genetic variance than men do, so they all just kind of look alike.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DelonLover1999, silently_said, Deleted member 74849 and 2 others
bumping this nvke
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
'foid beauty is subjective but male beauty is objective'
Yes, that's exactly right. Every man has a different type of foid he likes while all foids have only type of man they like.
 
Yes, that's exactly right. Every man has a different type of foid he likes while all foids have only type of man they like.
caged @Magnum Opus @HarrierDuBois
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
>No fucking argument
Done.
Your point is scientific (something about the behavior of individuals in a society), but you don't (and won't) provide any evidence, so...

If you were making a philosophical point, I would assume you would follow it up with an argument or something to explain your reasoning. But since you didn't, and was satisfied with just throwing a conjecture with no actual backbone in, I have no reason to believe this argument would be fruitful.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Yes, that's exactly right. Every man has a different type of foid he likes while all foids have only type of man they like.
There are more than one ideal man from the female perspective, many different axes cause different desires. Not every woman is the same person in terms of psyche as well as physical features so they will all value men differently.

Just think about it, how can a 5'0 latina girl and a 5'7 european girl have the exact same preferences? One has a height shortage so will most likely seek out height over face, the other one may prioritize things such as facial attractiveness, let's say the european girl has thin eyebrows she may prioritize a man with thick eyebrows but a few inches shorter than the girl who is short.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DelonLover1999
There are more than one ideal man from the female perspective
I'm not fucking saying that there is literally one man foids like. I'm saying that foids only have one type of man they are attracted to, which is a tall wide gigachad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
I'm not fucking saying that there is literally one man foids like. I'm saying that foids only have one type of man they are attracted to, which is a tall wide gigachad.
Yes but a tall wide gigachad doesn't exist, it's a concept, no man is tall + wide + has a gigachad face. In terms of the men that are available women will pertain to certain features and aspects of his personhood more than others. Males generally just have lower standards (as well as SMV) which may translate into an appearence of a 'wider range of taste' but in reality they just have lower requirements.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
which would insinuate far beyond 6 PSL
Literally no one fucking cares about PSL. The only thing that matters is how appealing you are to foids.
Do you understand that your statement that tall wide gigachad doesn't exist is retarded or not?
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
Literally no one fucking cares about PSL. The only thing that matters is how appealing you are to foids.
Do you understand that your statement that tall wide gigachad doesn't exist is retarded or not?
Scratch the PSL, just go off of facial attractiveness alone. Show me one man who is tall + wide + gigachad face. I'll wait.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
Show me one man who is tall + wide + gigachad face
I fucking showed him to you, retard.
>B-b-b--b-b-but he is only 6 PSL
He can fuck any foid he wants so he is objectively gigachad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
I fucking showed him to you, retard.
>B-b-b--b-b-but he is only 6 PSL
He can fuck any foid he wants so he is objectively gigachad.
He is not 6 PSL, he's below that. Besides the point. You don't know what objective means.
How can a subjective fluid thing (female preference), be an objective measurement (stagnant and defined)?
Doesn't matter what girls you can fuck when rating your attractiveness as it per definition becomes subjective.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
female preference)
There is no such thing as "foid preference", foids have only one type of man they are attracted to. Men have different preferences in foids.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
There is no such thing as "foid preference", foids have only one type of man they are attracted to. Men have different preferences in foids.
Men are equally attracted to different women as women are to different men.
The idea that men are attracted to different types of women to a larger extent than women is a rest product based on the fact that men have lower standards which is a mix between low SMV and low disgust sensitivity. If you increased the male disgust sensitivity (such as mine that is really high) as well as increasing their SMV by a substantial amount, you would see that their preference all of a sudden narrows down much more to their individual ideal which would be of the same spread as the female preferences are.
 
Men are equally attracted to different women as women are to different men.
That's incorrect. If you take 10 foids and ask every man on the planet to rate them - you will get different answers each time, because men have different preferences for foids. However, foids are only attracted to tall wide gigachads so they will only positively rate tall wide gigachad, since they have only one type.
 
That's incorrect. If you take 10 foids and ask every man on the planet to rate them - you will get different answers each time, because men have different preferences for foids. However, foids are only attracted to tall wide gigachads so they will only positively rate tall wide gigachad, since they have only one type.
How is it incorrect? I already laid out the groundwork regarding the misconception about male standards, men don't have a wider range they just don't have high standards due to lacking SMV. Chad won't prefer anything except skinny, tall, angel skulled women if you want to narrow it down to base concepts, the pseudo preference of 'thicc' women comes down the fact that the man cannot get a thin girl as well as the pseudo preference of short women coming in from the fact that the man himself is too short.

Once again every body is unique with their own flaws and desires that affects their preference, fundamentally men want skinny, tall, angel skulled women because those are the types of women that handsome tall men choose.
 
How is it incorrect?
If you take 10 foids and ask every man on the planet to rate them - you will get different answers each time, because men have different preferences for foids. However, foids are only attracted to tall wide gigachads so they will only positively rate tall wide gigachad, since they have only one type.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
If you take 10 foids and ask every man on the planet to rate them - you will get different answers each time, because men have different preferences for foids. However, foids are only attracted to tall wide gigachads so they will only positively rate tall wide gigachad, since they have only one type.
Address my argument or forfeit, simple as boyo.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truthhurts
Address my argument
What fucking argument, retard? I'm telling you why foids only have one preference and your "argument" is "N-NO *sniff* TRUST ME BRO IT'S NOT LIEK THAT". That's not an argument.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truthhurts
You didn't address it, brutal you lost holy.
>Literally cannot point his own argument because he obviously doesn't have one
And just like that.... I won.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truthhurts
>Literally cannot point his own argument because he obviously doesn't have one
And just like that.... I won.
Caging, but if you're curious where to find my argument for a rematch, read what is next to the preliminary question of mine that you quoted.
You know...95% of what I wrote...:p
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
Caging, but if you're curious where to find my argument for a rematch, read what is next to the preliminary question of mine that you quoted.
>No argument
Done.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: truthhurts
>No argument
Done.
I already laid out the groundwork regarding the misconception about male standards, men don't have a wider range they just don't have high standards due to lacking SMV. Chad won't prefer anything except skinny, tall, angel skulled women if you want to narrow it down to base concepts, the pseudo preference of 'thicc' women comes down the fact that the man cannot get a thin girl as well as the pseudo preference of short women coming in from the fact that the man himself is too short.

Once again every body is unique with their own flaws and desires that affects their preference, fundamentally men want skinny, tall, angel skulled women because those are the types of women that handsome tall men choose.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
@HarrierDuBois
>Chad won't prefer anything except skinny, tall, angel skulled women
That's just insane lie. Chad CONSTANTLY date ugly foids. The reason why they date them is because men have individual preferences in foids.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
@HarrierDuBois
>Chad won't prefer anything except skinny, tall, angel skulled women
That's just insane lie. Chad CONSTANTLY date ugly foids. The reason why they date them is because men have individual preferences in foids.
And stacy dates subhuman, shit happens what can I say.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts

Similar threads

muhajudin21
Replies
30
Views
96
Blondepawg'sDildo
Blondepawg'sDildo
simematic
Replies
5
Views
49
Jordan Barrett
Jordan Barrett
foidrapjst
Replies
26
Views
246
phosphorusltn
phosphorusltn
Jordan Barrett
Replies
21
Views
215
Jordan Barrett
Jordan Barrett
Bars
Replies
1
Views
26
ImSomeone
ImSomeone

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top