Wallenberg
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2021
- Posts
- 28,842
- Reputation
- 37,320
His face is horrible. Hard to find a single good feature on his face.wop = without papers aka shitalian
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
His face is horrible. Hard to find a single good feature on his face.wop = without papers aka shitalian
Rich well groomed normie gets BeckyView attachment 1739410“Not angular enough or intimidating looking, he’s an incel” - narcy Indians
I mog him my average rate in pm’s is 6 pslView attachment 1739410“Not angular enough or intimidating looking, he’s an incel” - narcy Indians
Oh, wow. How could you come with a such conclusion?His face is horrible. Hard to find a single good feature on his face.
Yes, exactly why I mentioned that you rate based on in real life appeal than PSL autistic measures.I can rate fully based on PSL autistic measures, and give full detailed breakdowns but I don't bother arguing cos everyone has their own subjective takes here.
Since you are a mutt, how bad do you suffer from self-hate?Oh, wow. How could you come with a such conclusion?
Looks Dom imo hunter eyes
No I mean Sean O' Pry is higher PSL than Nick Bateman for example but Bateman prolly has higher appeal. Both are IRL 10's tho, no point arguing ngl, makes 0 difference to me who mogs between two GL people.Yes, exactly why I mentioned that you rate based on in real life appeal than PSL autistic measures.
Everyone's a mixed gook in eastern jewrope.Since you are a mutt, how bad do you suffer from self-hate?
You aren't in Eastern Europe thoEveryone's a mixed gook in eastern jewrope.
I am.You aren't in Eastern Europe tho
very wholesome bruv. Are you bisexual per chanceAll I wanted to tell you is that no matter how someone looks, please, do not insult each other, do not be insecure, enjoy yours lifes.
Time is running fast and do not put too much effort in your look. Take care more about your social life, health.
Nope.I am.
Why would I lie about being in a thirdworldistan shithole filled with subhumans?Nope.
That's a good question. You tell me. EE women are quite good for ONS tho.Why would I lie about being in a thirdworldistan shithole filled with subhumans?
Grass is greener. Contrary to your belief, eastern jewropean women are subhuman tier in looks department just like their male counterparts.That's a good question. You tell me. EE women are quite good for ONS tho.
Nah, EE women are somewhat attractive. I won't consider most of them for LTR tho.Grass is greener. Contrary to your belief, eastern jewropean women are subhuman tier in looks department just like their male counterparts.
Dementia tier reply.Nah, EE women are somewhat attractive. I won't consider most of them for LTR tho.
very wholesome bruv. Are you bisexual per chance
It is nice to debate about look, but I do not like when someone is laughing at somoene's appearance. That's rude. Also I know sometimes I could too harsh. I am sorry.very wholesome bruv. Are you bisexual per chance
The biggest problem with EE women is that they tend to age quickly.Dementia tier reply.
How would you compare me to Nick BatemanNo I mean Sean O' Pry is higher PSL than Nick Bateman for example but Bateman prolly has higher appeal. Both are IRL 10's tho, no point arguing ngl, makes 0 difference to me who mogs between two GL people.
Once again 4chan/lookism tier reply. They just simply look like shit. You've been subjected to seeing many god tier PSL models that age well and thus yours views are skewed. Same thing can be said about westerners. Just look at how some 20yo whyt females look like.The biggest problem with EE women is that they tend to age quickly.
EE women are attractive and it's a well known thing. Western women age better than EE women. I think you are bitter to EE women because of your inceldom.Once again 4chan/lookism tier reply. They just simply look like shit. You've been subjected to seeing many god tier PSL models that age well and thus yours views are skewed. Same thing can be said about westerners. Just look at how some 20yo whyt females look like.
View attachment 1739470
Well known thing to 50yo MSTOW faggots. Also, why would I be bitter JFL? I'm thankful for them that they didn't beat the shit out of me, that's it. It's just that westerns think that eastern jewrope is better when it's really not. Just because some retards spam photoshopped alien pimenova that doesn't mean that EE females are good-looking JFL. There was a reason why slavoids were once called der untermenschen that were to be exterminated.EE women are attractive and it's a well known thing. Western women age better than EE women. I think you are bitter to EE women because of your inceldom.
Nick Bateman is really handome for sure. You may laught at me what I will say but I assure you this is not a cope. Good looking is nice thing, but what is really important in life is being savvy in life, when you do not have to pretend to be someone else. I want be surrounded by people who treat me well.How would you compare me to Nick Bateman
That's not my good image, how about with this? -
Nahh. Not gonna lie. This model is more handome. But he is more handome than 99,99% of population. Nothing to worry about.
holy shit is this real where is this from DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDYou really take everything at the face value, don't you?
View attachment 1739358
R.I.P Rich Pianaholy shit is this real where is this from DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
yeah i know rich ofc but i didnt know he was like this lmaooooooooooooo which video is this clip fromR.I.P Rich Piana
View attachment 1739533
Just google rich piana nigger or smth.yeah i know rich ofc but i didnt know he was like this lmaooooooooooooo which video is this clip from
Barrett’s not close to a alien tbh, he has great eyes, and a mogger side profileSMV is important, not PSL scale formed by some silly users. I always laugh at people who claim that Timothée Chalamet is PSL=5 which means that he is barely a weak chadlite . All girls I know consider him as the most beautiful person they wish to meet.
Only one measurement is fine if we are talking about how good looking is someone. It is NOT a rating from looksmax.org, it is reactions from women. That's all. Chalamet is VERY attractive according what girls say/write. Check his instagram, YT, pinterest etc. They worship him so much, but autists here say muh ,,buggy eyes, fragile, recessed".
That's funny how most of the users rate UFO Jordan Barrett PSL 7 who does not have even 1 percent of feedback what Chalamet receive who is PSL 5 here.
Your actions remind me how USSR market worked. Once communist secretary decided about prices of wares not free market. Free market prices Chalamet's look reallyyyy high but communist secreatary here will say ,,he does not have HUNTER EYES, all he has is COLLAGEN".
If you have A LOT OF ATTENCION from girls- you must be considered as chad. That's why pretty boys are underrated here because you do not know what female gaze is.
I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
PSL is only good if we are talking about chances in modeling. But most girls prefere more ,,ordinary look" which is highly underrated here. You judge someone's look to schematically checking your list with muh ,,huge jaw, hunter eyes, maxilla" etc and you pay no attencion to harmony unlike the girls.
That’s 100% true, but striking features and modelesque features are still idealI think what OP is trying to point out is not that the PSL scale is useless, it’s just that facial averageness / harmony is arguably more important for your average girl that striking (modelesque) features
Barrettlmao chalamet is just chadlite with actor halo
id way rather be barret in the real world xD
Yeah so true people here said that my old self before stress destroyed me, was like 4.5 psl and normie. While I was slaying so much stacies, jb’s u can’t even imagine and got so much attention from girlsSMV is important, not PSL scale formed by some silly users. I always laugh at people who claim that Timothée Chalamet is PSL=5 which means that he is barely a weak chadlite . All girls I know consider him as the most beautiful person they wish to meet.
Only one measurement is fine if we are talking about how good looking is someone. It is NOT a rating from looksmax.org, it is reactions from women. That's all. Chalamet is VERY attractive according what girls say/write. Check his instagram, YT, pinterest etc. They worship him so much, but autists here say muh ,,buggy eyes, fragile, recessed".
That's funny how most of the users rate UFO Jordan Barrett PSL 7 who does not have even 1 percent of feedback what Chalamet receive who is PSL 5 here.
Your actions remind me how USSR market worked. Once communist secretary decided about prices of wares not free market. Free market prices Chalamet's look reallyyyy high but communist secreatary here will say ,,he does not have HUNTER EYES, all he has is COLLAGEN".
If you have A LOT OF ATTENCION from girls- you must be considered as chad. That's why pretty boys are underrated here because you do not know what female gaze is.
I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
PSL is only good if we are talking about chances in modeling. But most girls prefere more ,,ordinary look" which is highly underrated here. You judge someone's look to schematically checking your list with muh ,,huge jaw, hunter eyes, maxilla" etc and you pay no attencion to harmony unlike the girls.
I'm gonna tell you right now, if Jordan Barrett was in front of any girl who claims he's "ugly," she'd be sucking him off rn. Where you fuck up is ever considering anything to say, you should've learned not to do that by now.SMV is important, not PSL scale formed by some silly users. I always laugh at people who claim that Timothée Chalamet is PSL=5 which means that he is barely a weak chadlite . All girls I know consider him as the most beautiful person they wish to meet.
Only one measurement is fine if we are talking about how good looking is someone. It is NOT a rating from looksmax.org, it is reactions from women. That's all. Chalamet is VERY attractive according what girls say/write. Check his instagram, YT, pinterest etc. They worship him so much, but autists here say muh ,,buggy eyes, fragile, recessed".
That's funny how most of the users rate UFO Jordan Barrett PSL 7 who does not have even 1 percent of feedback what Chalamet receive who is PSL 5 here.
Your actions remind me how USSR market worked. Once communist secretary decided about prices of wares not free market. Free market prices Chalamet's look reallyyyy high but communist secreatary here will say ,,he does not have HUNTER EYES, all he has is COLLAGEN".
If you have A LOT OF ATTENCION from girls- you must be considered as chad. That's why pretty boys are underrated here because you do not know what female gaze is.
I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
PSL is only good if we are talking about chances in modeling. But most girls prefere more ,,ordinary look" which is highly underrated here. You judge someone's look to schematically checking your list with muh ,,huge jaw, hunter eyes, maxilla" etc and you pay no attencion to harmony unlike the girls.
Again this is why I ask did you think before typing this nonsense out. JFL. This is why I mentioned the age thing. This is like comparing a pickup truck to an 18 wheeler. Doesn't even make sense. Of course girls at a young age are gonna pick first set of retards you mentioned. Do you really think a women in her early to mid 20's is gonna pick a Harry Styles over a Gandy? If so:I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
Bro chamelote is ugly ass shitSMV is important, not PSL scale formed by some silly users. I always laugh at people who claim that Timothée Chalamet is PSL=5 which means that he is barely a weak chadlite . All girls I know consider him as the most beautiful person they wish to meet.
Only one measurement is fine if we are talking about how good looking is someone. It is NOT a rating from looksmax.org, it is reactions from women. That's all. Chalamet is VERY attractive according what girls say/write. Check his instagram, YT, pinterest etc. They worship him so much, but autists here say muh ,,buggy eyes, fragile, recessed".
That's funny how most of the users rate UFO Jordan Barrett PSL 7 who does not have even 1 percent of feedback what Chalamet receive who is PSL 5 here.
Your actions remind me how USSR market worked. Once communist secretary decided about prices of wares not free market. Free market prices Chalamet's look reallyyyy high but communist secreatary here will say ,,he does not have HUNTER EYES, all he has is COLLAGEN".
If you have A LOT OF ATTENCION from girls- you must be considered as chad. That's why pretty boys are underrated here because you do not know what female gaze is.
I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
PSL is only good if we are talking about chances in modeling. But most girls prefere more ,,ordinary look" which is highly underrated here. You judge someone's look to schematically checking your list with muh ,,huge jaw, hunter eyes, maxilla" etc and you pay no attencion to harmony unlike the girls.
what the fuck is that
you should kill yourself NOW, u delusional retarded indian skinnyfat boy
Agree strongly@phukmikehok rates me 6.75 PSL, how far do you agree?
psl matters you retard but its only one factor in the grand scheme.SMV is important, not PSL scale formed by some silly users. I always laugh at people who claim that Timothée Chalamet is PSL=5 which means that he is barely a weak chadlite . All girls I know consider him as the most beautiful person they wish to meet.
Only one measurement is fine if we are talking about how good looking is someone. It is NOT a rating from looksmax.org, it is reactions from women. That's all. Chalamet is VERY attractive according what girls say/write. Check his instagram, YT, pinterest etc. They worship him so much, but autists here say muh ,,buggy eyes, fragile, recessed".
That's funny how most of the users rate UFO Jordan Barrett PSL 7 who does not have even 1 percent of feedback what Chalamet receive who is PSL 5 here.
Your actions remind me how USSR market worked. Once communist secretary decided about prices of wares not free market. Free market prices Chalamet's look reallyyyy high but communist secreatary here will say ,,he does not have HUNTER EYES, all he has is COLLAGEN".
If you have A LOT OF ATTENCION from girls- you must be considered as chad. That's why pretty boys are underrated here because you do not know what female gaze is.
I assure you- almost all girl would pick Chalamet, Harry Styles, Lachowski, young Di Caprio instead of grandpa ugly nose Gandy, robotic O'Pry, Barrett who does not look even human.
PSL is only good if we are talking about chances in modeling. But most girls prefere more ,,ordinary look" which is highly underrated here. You judge someone's look to schematically checking your list with muh ,,huge jaw, hunter eyes, maxilla" etc and you pay no attencion to harmony unlike the girls.