PSL rating + tips and advice?

J

jordannwlr

Iron
Joined
Aug 12, 2023
Posts
51
Reputation
18
I’m currently 6’0, 19, and in the military (stating so my hair suggestions is limited, 4 inch length, 2 inch bulk)

This is what I currently look like, and also the supplements I bought, I heard there’s way to cycle them during the week for better quality of usage, but just let me know.

Give me a rating and advice!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2217.jpeg
    IMG_2217.jpeg
    369.4 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2162.jpeg
    IMG_2162.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2152.jpeg
    IMG_2152.jpeg
    967 KB · Views: 0
  • 2E3CC75A-DED3-4ED2-9E1A-54498055DF8D.mp4
    4.2 MB
  • +1
Reactions: Mumbaicel and myvideodrome
lmtn, nigger nose is brutal and large ahh forehead
mirin zygo bonemass tho, eye are is alright but brows could be lower
rhino is onnly advice i can give really
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: TamazighenKM and Restitutor Orbis
maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Restitutor Orbis and vincentzygo
maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.
Htn?? JFLLL:lul::lul:
 
munchkin pilled.

Low MTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skull Based Sage
Htn?? JFLLL:lul::lul:
his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug
 
  • +1
Reactions: jordannwlr
dont worry
his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug
very impressive
 
  • +1
Reactions: myvideodrome
his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug
TLDR: I’m a faggot who’s hyper fixated on overanalyzing random dudes on incel forums:lul:
No one’s reading all that bro
 
maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.
If this nigga is HTN then ER was CL :lul::lul:
 
Holy shit, how can someone have an IQ as low as yours:feelsuhh:
 

Similar threads

6´3 LTN
Replies
48
Views
2K
6´3 LTN
6´3 LTN
wat
Replies
42
Views
2K
rawr
R
P
Replies
90
Views
5K
ASCENSCI0N
ASCENSCI0N
A
Replies
146
Views
4K
DarkoTheNihilist
DarkoTheNihilist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top