PSL rating + tips and advice?

[jordannwlr]

I’m currently 6’0, 19, and in the military (stating so my hair suggestions is limited, 4 inch length, 2 inch bulk)

This is what I currently look like, and also the supplements I bought, I heard there’s way to cycle them during the week for better quality of usage, but just let me know.

Give me a rating and advice!

 

[vincentzygo]

lmtn, nigger nose is brutal and large ahh forehead
mirin zygo bonemass tho, eye are is alright but brows could be lower
rhino is onnly advice i can give really

 

[Mumbaicel]

lookin good g

 

[myvideodrome]

maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.

 

[Skull Based Sage]

maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.

Htn?? JFLLL

 

[butterfly401]

you are good

 

[butterfly401]

Htn?? JFLLL

he can have low cl appeal if he starts looksmaxxing properly

 

[ASCENSCI0N]

munchkin pilled.

Low MTN

 

[Skull Based Sage]

he can have low cl appeal if he starts looksmaxxing properly

Maybe mid to high HTN appeal if he starts HARDmaxing properly. Nowhere near low cl

 

[ASCENSCI0N]

he can have low cl appeal if he starts looksmaxxing properly

Low CL in the slums of jaipur maybe

 

[Skull Based Sage]

Low CL in the slums of jaipur maybe

These people are so clueless getting this guy’s hopes up

 

[butterfly401]

Low CL in the slums of jaipur maybe

im a chad from tashkent, he can be as well

 

[myvideodrome]

Htn?? JFLLL

his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug

 

[butterfly401]

dont worry

his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug

very impressive

 

[Skull Based Sage]

his vertical thirds (hairline to brow, brow to nose, nose to chin) are almost dead even.
64:62:63, we’re talking about ~2% deviation from ideal 1:1:1 symmetry.
that’s solid, most people aren’t this proportionate. it shows good midface balance and no glaring elongation or compression.
bizygomatic width = 370
upper facial height = 212
370 / 212 = 1.75

ideal masculine range is 1.6 to 1.85, and he’s sitting comfortably right in the middle.
eye width ≈ 48
gap between eyes ≈ 52
52 / 48 = 1.08

that’s just slightly wider than ideal, but still within a natural tolerance range. it's not spaced out enough to hurt his symmetry, but it's not the tight hunter‐eye look either. eye shape and tension can't be fully judged in these pics due to lighting and expression, but spacing's the measurable flaw.
brow to nose = 62
nose to chin = 63
that’s a ratio of 0.98 — golden ratio (1.618) is nowhere in sight.
this doesn’t mean "bad," it means his lower face length is proportionally heavier than the midface. it throws off some of the classical harmony, but improvement is achievable. jaw angle is ~123° — masculine, not too sharp or too wide; but a stronger projection of the maxilla from his side would be better.
with leaner mass, improved camera angle, better lighting, and maybe a shift in expression (less neutral, more relaxed eyes), he could easily enter a higher range which is above average. he doesn’t need surgery. he needs grooming, angle discipline, and time. face gains and low body fat help amplify the strengths (mainly cheekbones and jaw width). didn't do any strong math with this one, a bit lazy, but shrug

TLDR: I’m a faggot who’s hyper fixated on overanalyzing random dudes on incel forums
No one’s reading all that bro

 

[VolcelFTW]

lose weight first

 

[Restitutor Orbis]

maxillomandibular advancement or a midface filler; otherwise just keep mewing lol, you seem fine to me, high appeal and not a bad rating (low htn). I believe there is chadlite potential; please dm me for personal taps if you'd like.

If this nigga is HTN then ER was CL

 

[myvideodrome]

can’t argue against math, bud; anything else is a personal opinion and a conflation.

If this nigga is HTN then ER was CL

 

[myvideodrome]

well

TLDR: I’m a faggot who’s hyper fixated on overanalyzing random dudes on incel forums
No one’s reading all that bro

it’s a PSL forum.

 

[Skull Based Sage]

Holy shit, how can someone have an IQ as low as yours

 

[MorrocanMtn]

js get lean bro its obvious