PSL retards have no taste in women

Lol her boyfriend body mogs you, and is 29. I'm sure he's better than 99% of PSL community at slaying.

View attachment 2346398View attachment 2346409

Add the tits halo

Again you don't seem to look at the shit you send. You literally see non-PSL maxxed girls in the post way too often - Angelina Jolie, Ryan Gosling's gfs and so on. PSL retards call them ugly.
I know these girls like roidcel mfs. When I was huge asf I'd match these weird girls occasionally and it's weird
Also the group chat is clowning me for even posting your garbage
Screenshot 20230728 150930 Messenger Lite
Screenshot 20230728 150922 Messenger Lite
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Again you don't seem to look at the shit you send.
I did.
You literally see non-PSL maxxed girls in the post way too often - Angelina Jolie, Ryan Gosling's gfs and so on. PSL retards call them ugly.
They don't call them ugly. You're taking troll posts seriously.
Ops amazing taste at work
View attachment 2346415
won't change his mind at all jfl
if a thousand men rate her a zero then all of them are low iq basement dwellers
the coping mechanism is very strong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
  • JFL
Reactions: Blackgymmax
And by the way she's not what I'd wanna fuck. I'm stating many guys would take her with the tits halo as a fuck girl. I never said these girls appeal to me, just that celebrities don't agree with PSL and prove PSL is shit because looks truly are subjective.
Look retard. The better looking you at the less subjective it is. A girl who's subjectively pretty = 6/10
A girl who's an 8/10 like 90% of guys will call her pretty.
 
  • +1
Reactions: reptiles and LooksOrDeath
Look retard. The better looking you at the less subjective it is. A girl who's subjectively pretty = 6/10
A girl who's an 8/10 like 90% of guys will call her pretty.
Dude you literally said you prefer flat stacy to curvy becky, no wonder you're on roids. Your sexual instincts are truly fucked up.
 
subconscious coping mechanism since given their looks level they can only get butterfaced borderline fat mtbs anyway, with their defensive reaction of choice for not having the requisite looks themselves being supposed high T levels. its their way of telling the legit hot women "you can't fire me, I quit"
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: SonOfDarkseid, LooksOrDeath and Blackgymmax
Look retard. The better looking you at the less subjective it is. A girl who's subjectively pretty = 6/10
A girl who's an 8/10 like 90% of guys will call her pretty.
And by the way the hoe your homies be rating 0 and tattooed shit has over 600k likes on onlyfans. So tell me people don't wanna fuck her, that's more than most porn actresses e. g. Autumn Falls, Victoria June, etc. You wanna tell yourself you taste is better than thousands of men who literally pay 30 eur a month to see her shake her ass.

If she was truly repulsive she wouldn't be getting all the traction over there.
 
subconscious coping mechanism since given their looks level they can only get butterfaced borderline fat mtbs anyway, with their defensive reaction of choice for not having the requisite looks themselves being supposed high T levels. its their way of telling the legit hot women "you can't fire me, I quit"
Yeah sure, whatever helps you sleep at night. You can't touch any of the women who these mfs reject in your dreams.
 
And by the way the hoe your homies be rating 0 and tattooed shit has over 600k likes on onlyfans. So tell me people don't wanna fuck her, that's more than most porn actresses e. g. Autumn Falls, Victoria June, etc. You wanna tell yourself you taste is better than thousands of men who literally pay 30 eur a month to see her shake her ass.
The thing is that basically every woman on OLD gets 2000 likes a day so overtime especially with advertising over the planet, any girl could have 600k dudes wanting to fuck her.
However as I said before most of these women followers are old men ltn blacks and curries
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
The thing is that basically every woman on OLD gets 2000 likes a day so overtime especially with advertising over the planet, any girl could have 600k dudes wanting to fuck her.
However as I said before most of these women followers are old men ltn blacks and curries
Bro, I understand where you are coming from, but 610k likes means fucking the best in business. Lisa Ann barely has 700k. Victoria June has just 80k, Julia Ann has 400k, Nicolette Shea has 580k. Imagine this hoe having more than all those most popular pornactresses.

To add to how incredible this stat is for you to say oh no she's not good slut:

Anissa Kate: 132K likes
Bridgette B: 599K likes
Apolonia Lapiedra: 146K likes
etc.
 
Last edited:
Bro, I understand where you are coming from, but 610k likes means fucking the best in business. Lisa Ann barely has 700k. Victoria June has just 80k, Julia Ann has 400k, Nicolette Shea has 580k. Imagine this hoe having more than all those most popular pornactresses.
It's just advertising. Their smv is probably the same as like a random Becky on the street. A mid blonde with no tits or ass gets 12000 likes a day from OLD of guys wanting to fuck her.
 
Tbh i think a brunette htb with brown eyes is more attractive than a blue eyed stacy

I don't know, it's my brain that wants it
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlavicGeneral
It's just advertising. Their smv is probably the same as like a random Becky on the street. A mid blonde with no tits or ass gets 12000 likes a day from OLD of guys wanting to fuck her.
Bro it can't be advertising, why the fuck do most well-known pornstars have fewer likes. She has her appeal and guys want to fuck her, she even dates a hot gym athlete. You are coping hard because she isn't in your niche and thus it means she is not hot, I'd smash the shit out of her but don't consider her face pretty.

BTW: I know it got heated, but I want you and @LooksOrDeath to know I've got nothing but respect for you. I did make some bad calls on some posts you wrote to prove the point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Bro it can't be advertising, why the fuck do most well-known pornstars have fewer likes. She has her appeal and guys want to fuck her, she even dates a hot gym athlete. You are coping hard because she isn't in your niche and thus it means she is not hot, I'd smash the shit out of her but don't consider her face pretty.
Advertising is it. How do obese land whale pornstars w shit faces have loads of followers? You say appeal this appeal that but I can show chico lachowski to women and 90% will find him attractive. I show those girls and like what 30% do? There's a 250lbs girl w no Chin on tiktok married to a gymcel
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath and SlavicGeneral
Advertising is it. How do obese land whale pornstars w shit faces have loads of followers? You say appeal this appeal that but I can show chico lachowski to women and 90% will find him attractive. I show those girls and like what 30% do?
I don't agree with the chico part exactly, there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively, like bad boys, chiseled men, etc. Truth is most women will find him hot, correct, but I still believe if you show this hoe there's stigma towards saying you'd fuck her because she looks whorish and it's not expected from you to say. I've had many friends tell me they don't like roasties, sluts etc, yet when given an opportunity they take them.
 
Also just to be clear. My taste is objectively correct and better than all of yours. I will defend this to the death. If you're not attracted to the women I'm also attracted to, then you are just simply wrong.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Also just to be clear. My taste is objectively correct and better than all of yours. I will defend this to the death. If you're not attracted to the women I'm also attracted to, then you are just simply wrong.
Dude you are clowning the forum at best, not me. These retards will call you mentally ill for liking htbs and not their so-called stacies.
 
I don't agree with the chico part exactly, there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively, like bad boys, chiseled men, etc. Truth is most women will find him hot, correct, but I still believe if you show this hoe there's stigma towards saying you'd fuck her because she looks whorish and it's not expected from you to say. I've had many friends tell me they don't like roasties, sluts etc, yet when given an opportunity they take them.
You don't have to agree. I've shown women chico and most girls find him attractive. The girl you posted has like Becky appeal and below. Her looksmatch is like an ugly guy with like 1 really good feature
 
bad boys and chiseled men are races, I see
Dude your reading comprehension is 0 then:

there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively, like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.

is not the same as saying

there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.

My sentence means girls who date some races exclusively and(or) like bad boys/chiseled man, but again I'm arguing with 0 iq
 
He means chad archetypes
Excuse his language he's new to this
Lol I've been on this forum for almost a year lurking, registered last year and just engage from time to time. Dude has 0 reading comprehension and blames it on me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
none of those girls would ever get famous in their own right from their looks, therefore the mass does not consider them good looking
 
BTW: I know it got heated, but I want you and @LooksOrDeath to know I've got nothing but respect for you. I did make some bad calls on some posts you wrote to prove the point.
bro has no enemies 💀
 
  • Love it
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
You don't have to agree. I've shown women chico and most girls find him attractive. The girl you posted has like Becky appeal and below. Her looksmatch is like an ugly guy with like 1 really good feature
There are plenty of chads willing to take her, while you and I are rotting on here. It imo disproves the looksmatch-theory and that's the whole point, she dates a hot guy, fucks hot guys and has plenty of hot guys waiting in line for her. She may not be no model but looks are judged by treshold by average guys. If you are above certain level you are attractive no matter what, nobody calculates your canthal tilt angle when assessing your attractiveness irl.

bro has no enemies 💀
I like to keep my shit civil and learn from more experienced looksmaxers. This is more of a debate than anything, but I hate people dropping no arguments at all when calling me wrong.
 
Daisy Ridley
 98695503 atwell crop getty



giga stacies (for me)

I know they're rated tranny/10 here by some guys
 
  • +1
Reactions: HitAndRun
There are plenty of chads willing to take her, while you and I are rotting on here. It imo disproves the looksmatch-theory and that's the whole point, she dates a hot guy, fucks hot guys and has plenty of hot guys waiting in line for her. She may not be no model but looks are judged by treshold by average guys. If you are above certain level you are attractive no matter what, nobody calculates your canthal tilt angle when assessing your attractiveness irl.


I like to keep my shit civil and learn from more experienced looksmaxers. This is more of a debate than anything, but I hate people dropping no arguments at all when calling me wrong.
No there definitely aren't plenty of chads lmao. Most hot guys won't like these women and would prefer an average girl over it.
 
There are plenty of chads willing to take her, while you and I are rotting on here. It imo disproves the looksmatch-theory and that's the whole point, she dates a hot guy, fucks hot guys and has plenty of hot guys waiting in line for her. She may not be no model but looks are judged by treshold by average guys. If you are above certain level you are attractive no matter what, nobody calculates your canthal tilt angle when assessing your attractiveness irl.


I like to keep my shit civil and learn from more experienced looksmaxers. This is more of a debate than anything, but I hate people dropping no arguments at all when calling me wrong.
Me posting on this forum doesn't disprove looksmatch-theory. The problem with you is that you think a girl using her smv power to the most means she's a stacy because most girls don't care to. Most girls could do more damage if they wanted. Alot of them could try their best to hypergsmy max and fuck celebs w decent looks if they actually tried hard enough. That doesn't mean they're very attractive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath and SlavicGeneral
There are plenty of chads willing to take her, while you and I are rotting on here. It imo disproves the looksmatch-theory and that's the whole point, she dates a hot guy, fucks hot guys and has plenty of hot guys waiting in line for her. She may not be no model but looks are judged by treshold by average guys. If you are above certain level you are attractive no matter what, nobody calculates your canthal tilt angle when assessing your attractiveness irl.


I like to keep my shit civil and learn from more experienced looksmaxers. This is more of a debate than anything, but I hate people dropping no arguments at all when calling me wrong.
And yes it's true that once you're above a threshold most will like you
However this does depend on shit like your canthal tilt. You're posting girls that most guys don't like irl.
 
A lot of pedo ass niggas here too who are legit attracted to girls and not women. You’ll post a picture of some nice estrogenic bitch with nice ass, tits, and hips, and they’ll call her a “roastie”
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlavicGeneral
No there definitely aren't plenty of chads lmao. Most hot guys won't like these women and would prefer an average girl over it.
Plenty in my book means enough to choose from. Out of those 600k likes there must be 20 chads at least, and I'd argue there's more. We've seen in my original post that real life chads go for much worse looking women than this forum promotes.

Dave East as a tyrone dated Blac Chyna who is literally this hoe I posted but worse.
 
Dude your reading comprehension is 0 then:
Your grammar is wrong
there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively, like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.
It should have been
date some races exclusively, and like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.
since there are only two articles. Dating races, and liking bad boys and chiseled men
is not the same as saying

there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.
This is a much more natural assumption. Especially given the context in your comment.
My sentence means girls who date some races exclusively and(or) like bad boys/chiseled man, but again I'm arguing with 0 iq
0 iq? Ironic given that, another way to read your sentence would be that bad boys and chiseled men are women who date some races exclusively.
,there are fair bit of women who date some races exclusively, like bad boys, chiseled men, etc
 
Plenty in my book means enough to choose from. Out of those 600k likes there must be 20 chads at least, and I'd argue there's more. We've seen in my original post that real life chads go for much worse looking women than this forum promotes.

Dave East as a tyrone dated Blac Chyna who is literally this hoe I posted but worse.
The problem is that even if there's 20
That chad has like 1000+ girls who are more attractive to ltr. She's in the same predicament as an average Becky. That's the problem the average woman has.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Me posting on this forum doesn't disprove looksmatch-theory. The problem with you is that you think a girl using her smv power to the most means she's a stacy because most girls don't care to. Most girls could do more damage if they wanted. Alot of them could try their best to hypergsmy max and fuck celebs w decent looks if they actually tried hard enough. That doesn't mean they're very attractive.
This makes a lot of sense.
The problem is that even if there's 20
That chad has like 1000+ girls who are more attractive to ltr. She's in the same predicament as an average Becky. That's the problem the average woman has.
Again the guys I've posted originally can get better but choose not to. Ryan Garcia can pick literally any woman he wants yet chose Drea. Dudes a chadlite, prettyboy maxed.

I've given you a counter example already with Blac Chyna.
 
A lot of pedo ass niggas here too who are legit attracted to girls and not women. You’ll post a picture of some nice estrogenic bitch with nice ass, tits, and hips, and they’ll call her a “roastie”
The ones you should watch out for are the ones that post Asian foids

Every mf I’ve ran into that unironically like Asians especially Kpop ones are kinda pedo lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticGymcel
The ones you should watch out for are the ones that post Asian foids

Every mf I’ve ran into that unironically like Asians especially Kpop ones are kinda pedo lol
The ones with anime avis too. Anime avi = 90% chance they are a pedo. Especially if it’s a really young looking girlish anime character.
 
Your grammar is wrong

It should have been

since there are only two articles. Dating races, and liking bad boys and chiseled men

This is a much more natural assumption. Especially given the context in your comment.

0 iq? Ironic given that, another way to read your sentence would be that bad boys and chiseled men are women who date some races exclusively.
Dude learn coma rules before talking about grammar. My grammar is 100% correct but you yet again fail to understand a simple english statement, so it's not the grammar's issue but your brain's.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
BTW: I know it got heated, but I want you and @
LooksOrDeath
@LooksOrDeath to know I've got nothing but respect for you. I did make some bad calls on some posts you wrote to prove the point.
This really isn't a heated discussion. You just called us names when there was no need.
 
This really isn't a heated discussion. You just called us names when there was no need.
Yeah that's what I meant by it. Sorry for that, I can be rough.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
The reason people get so anal and squeamish over "debates" on what women are "actually" attractive is because it actually has nothing to do with their own attraction. Otherwise it would be a live and let live situation. This debate is just a surrogate debate for what they think the ideal women should be. It's a proxy discussion for people to push their own view on what they wish all women wish they wanted to look like, and what they wish all men wished they had and as a way of coping with their own insecurity in who they find attractive. Because in the final analysis who you are attracted to is a reflection of yourself.

I think they deliberately want people to disagree with them as well so they have an opportunity to signal their own supposed higher status: "Well I'm higher T, well I like real women because I'm a real man, well I am heterosexual and you're not because the woman you posted has too low a gonial angle which is a male trait so therefore you are homosexual" etc. Just dead giveaways when they say things like that.

When people share who they are attracted to and engage in debates over it its because they're trying to grind a sociological axe not a sexual one. It's proven by the fact that almost everyone will routinely fuck and ltr girls that look nothing like the "type" they posted.

I only trust the taste of what the majority of rich dalmatian coast-vacationing 6-pics-on-insatgram with 1,500 followers high class wasp chad is into. Only these' guys sexual desires are untarnished by the kinds of traumas and coping mechanisms that condition most mens sexuality
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath and SlavicGeneral
Dude learn coma rules before talking about grammar. My grammar is 100% correct but you yet again fail to understand a simple english statement, so it's not the grammar's issue but your brain's.
Using a comma instead of the word "and" for only 2 articles is incorrect grammar.
 
Using a comma instead of the word "and" for only 2 articles is incorrect grammar.
Using a coma in this example of yours was incorrect, no need for coma when counting 2 things separated by and

date some races exclusively, and like bad boys, chiseled men, etc.
 
The reason people get so anal and squeamish over "debates" on what women are "actually" attractive is because it actually has nothing to do with their own attraction. Otherwise it would be a live and let live situation. This debate is just a surrogate debate for what they think the ideal women should be. It's a proxy discussion for people to push their own view on what they wish all women wish they wanted to look like, and what they wish all men wished they had and as a way of coping with their own insecurity in who they find attractive. Because in the final analysis who you are attracted to is a reflection of yourself.
For the most part I and many of the people Ik have always had the same overall type since we were young, many people on this forum are well aware of the fact that they’ll never be able to fuck any of the foids that they post and either deny it or just outwardly accept it entirely
I think they deliberately want people to disagree with them as well so they have an opportunity to signal their own supposed higher status: "Well I'm higher T, well I like real women because I'm a real man, well I am heterosexual and you're not because the woman you posted has too low a gonial angle which is a male trait so therefore you are homosexual" etc. Just dead giveaways when they say things like that.

When people share who they are attracted to and engage in debates over it its because they're trying to grind a sociological axe not a sexual one. It's proven by the fact that almost everyone will routinely fuck and ltr girls that look nothing like the "type" they posted.

I only trust the taste of what the majority of rich dalmatian coast-vacationing 6-pics-on-insatgram with 1,500 followers high class wasp chad is into. Only these' guys sexual desires are untarnished by the kinds of traumas and coping mechanisms that condition most mens sexuality
What makes you these that these rich high class chads are so untouched from the majority of society that they’re unable to be attracted to the same things that the average person already is, unless they’re so rich that they live in giant mansions and go to private schools or sum shit like that I highly doubt that
 
Using a coma in this example of yours was incorrect, no need for coma when counting 2 things separated by and
You're right. I just forgot to remove the comma in your sentence.

Me being wrong on accident doesn't make you right.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlavicGeneral

Similar threads

clearpilledplague
Replies
21
Views
518
noodlelover
noodlelover
maxilofailo
Replies
11
Views
436
the_bubble_dox
T
WishIwasChico
Replies
99
Views
4K
darkness97
darkness97

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top