P
politically correct
Bronze
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2022
- Posts
- 324
- Reputation
- 404
So I'm about 5 months post bimax with Ramieri. In my bimax he removed my jaw implants that he placed about 1yr prior. I had a pretty big advancement plus gonion widening (c.5mm each side) with custom plates. My main reason for removing implants was 1) I wanted to fix underlying lack of projection and 2) I wanted a more flared gonion look and a more refined design.
When designing my bimax Dr Ramieri superimposed my implants to set the level of widening, so my post bimax width is the same as what it previously was with the implants
My old design is shown below, these were removed during the bimax
I now want to plan a new set of implants
The main thing I wanted to ask about was that I had 'mild' massetter dihescence with the first set of jaw implants. It was pretty invisible from the side, the only thing was I lost a bit of definition from the front as the masseter was more bunched up and hid my gonions a bit, but on a 1-10 scale it was probably a 2 or 3 out of 10 in terms of severity
Is there a way that I can design the implants so that the dihescence is no worse than last time? I had it pretty mild last time and therefore if its no worse than that i'd be happy. But im terrified at the risk it would get even worse second time round. I know that whatever implant I do have will not be 100% covered by the masseter because even after bimax the masseter is permanently dettached
My main goals with the implant designs is angular gonions rather than rounded from the side profile, plus having visible flared gonions for the v shaped jawline from the front. Dr Ramieri suggested I would not need very large implants at all
If you have a rounder slightly smoother thicker implant contour does this mean that if you do get implant reveal, it doesnt look as bad as its not so much of a sharp edge?
@RealSurgerymax
When designing my bimax Dr Ramieri superimposed my implants to set the level of widening, so my post bimax width is the same as what it previously was with the implants
My old design is shown below, these were removed during the bimax
I now want to plan a new set of implants
The main thing I wanted to ask about was that I had 'mild' massetter dihescence with the first set of jaw implants. It was pretty invisible from the side, the only thing was I lost a bit of definition from the front as the masseter was more bunched up and hid my gonions a bit, but on a 1-10 scale it was probably a 2 or 3 out of 10 in terms of severity
Is there a way that I can design the implants so that the dihescence is no worse than last time? I had it pretty mild last time and therefore if its no worse than that i'd be happy. But im terrified at the risk it would get even worse second time round. I know that whatever implant I do have will not be 100% covered by the masseter because even after bimax the masseter is permanently dettached
My main goals with the implant designs is angular gonions rather than rounded from the side profile, plus having visible flared gonions for the v shaped jawline from the front. Dr Ramieri suggested I would not need very large implants at all
If you have a rounder slightly smoother thicker implant contour does this mean that if you do get implant reveal, it doesnt look as bad as its not so much of a sharp edge?
@RealSurgerymax
Last edited: