Quick caution for all FGFR-inhibitor users, high risk of deformity

I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR(3) inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
@exsttttt thoughts
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
15279
 
  • Love it
Reactions: ICL
The Ahmed one? Insulin resistance can be avoided if you have an iq over 70. i will tag you nighas. Underexpression is more nuanced.
Tag pls
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and Paul.jnxy
Dude you sent pictures of the gene deletion essentially. Inhibition is a compleltly different. Erda at 5 mg is inhibiting FGFR3 at around 30-40%. The case reports are ridicolous because they reported lower BA than expected and OPENING growth plates. In the case study you referenced, an 18 year old girl grew on it. The height percentile leaps are undeniable. I would argue that we can do more to limit sides. Not denying the risks
 
THANK YOU FOR MAKING TS:peepoWave:

This was needed so bad because many people here are clueless and just listen "fgfr3 inhibitors grow height = good!!" so this cleared up many concerns


read every molecule btw
dnr
 
If you look at "similar threads" section you'll see how there's endless threads on this.

View attachment 5196311

I feel like this should be pinned (if true) since this is regarded as a dangerous compound right now @Gengar’s Ghost @Hernan @Randomized @DildoFaggins thots?
i agree most people are retarded on it and havent done research. I am fully convinced it is one of the most powerful height compunds. Agressive, but powerful
 
I've been noticing many threads on taking FGFR(3) inhibitors recently, and I think many of these users have barely done any research;

At first, I felt like there are only studies and case studies for those with fgfr3 over-expression to inhibit it to normal (hence taller height), I'm not sure how making it underexpressed would yield a beneficial effect on height (an "worth it" effect) which is desirable or significant

Besides, FGFR3 is a brake for growth, it exists for a reason as it stops cartilage from becoming into bone. Inhibiting it to lower-than-normal makes me skeptic about possible deformation, or side effects. You'd be growing uncontrollably, unideal to your cells which are not perfect and will easily mess up.


Just look at children who used FGFR3 inhibitors, 42% of them develop SCFE, considered a medical emergency.

Erdafitinib had to be discontinued due to the patient's unusual rapid growth over the 9 months of therapy, severe kyphoscoliosis, and spinal cord compression with cervical myelopathy. The patient grew a total of 14.3 cm, or at an annualized growth of 19.06 cm (normal growth is ∼10 cm per year for a 15-year-old male).
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152661/#:~:text=e-,rdafitinib had to be,15-year-old male).,-Growth
View attachment 5196212
You may argue that this was a small group size of 7 patients, but, SCFE is an extremely rare condition, 3/7 which means this cannot be coincidence.

Impressively, one individual went from 170cm to 200cm in just 150 weeks, which is notable.

I assume you will not be using these in short cycles, as we've seen 50 weeks resulting in SCFE yet achieving 13cm of height

Another instance, those with congenital FGFR UNDERexpression usually grow tall but have deformities such as kyphosis, permanently bent fingers, etc; this is called CATSHL syndrome which makes you unusually tall while causing loss of function and making bones too long.

Is it really worth the height growth it gives you?

They also look similar to those who are marfanoid;
View attachment 5196227
so i'm not sure how practical it would be inhibiting it and if the stature gained from this is beneficial or desirable.

I'd like to see anyone that makes an FGFR3 thread countering these questions, which I'm looking forward to see if he'll bring something new to the table and address the dilemma's, especially the fact that some users contemplate Pan-FGFR inhibitors which would be egregious (case studies show fgfr1/2/3/4 inhibited yet caused a deformity, what would a pan-fgfr inhibitor do?)

@Vireon @anondude @N1kolai @81xa @chang cypionate
true but you can just buy selective inhabitors bhai :lul:
 

Similar threads

--ism
Replies
3
Views
54
rsj
rsj
pbr2088
Replies
11
Views
97
Niebvll
Niebvll
chigga6
Replies
14
Views
193
Certifiedlarp
Certifiedlarp
G
Replies
9
Views
185
greygreygrey123son
G
X
Replies
3
Views
47
xen.
X

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →