Rate this Asian dude (mogger)

[Tigermoggerlol]

I think hes high htn

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

@greycel @iblamexyz

 

[Deleted member 176423]

@Node husband

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Bump

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

@unon @grilldaddy❤️ @Luca_. @MogsGymMaxx @Alias!

 

[iblamexyz]

I think hes high htn
View attachment 4200258View attachment 4200259View attachment 4200260

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

uncanny not a bad rating though

 

[STAMPEDE]

High chadlite

 

[Deleted member 2100]

Chadlite tbh

 

[Deleted member 168856]

mtn

 

[ProBono]

harmony is uncanny as fuck but he has good bones, lean and fashionmaxxed

 

[SamosaChutneyCel]

Mogger in Asia but 2/10 in australia

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Chadlite tbh

He would be Cl but his ang gets capped at a 7 bc he has low set cheek bones and no chin despite being Tera lean

 

[greycel]

Mid-High CL

High chadlite

Great rate

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Mid-High CL

Great rate

Reall why? His dimo is low asf and so is his harmony

 

[greycel]

Reall why? His dimo is low asf and so is his harmony

I got a question
Do u do 25% split for those 4 categories

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

I got a question
Do u do 25% split for those 4 categories

Yes

 

[greycel]

Yes

Why?

 

[HtnGymcel]

I think hes high htn

True ricecel

 

[soggra]

I think hes high htn
View attachment 4200258View attachment 4200259View attachment 4200260

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

high mtn

 

[unon]

I think hes high htn
View attachment 4200258View attachment 4200259View attachment 4200260

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

Hmtn

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Why?

Science usually has it that way. Like for example Lucas Karger has a 9 dimo 8 ang 9 misc but a 5 harmony. So he’s high Cl. If I wear to just focus on his strong points like say fuck harmony and just give him chad that wouldnt fit the aesthetic stand point. Why? Bc harmony brings all of that together and prevents u from having that “uncanny” look. Or vise versa 5 ang 5 dimo misc but 9 harmony that’s still low htn bc he just looks like a normie in that case like nothing stands out

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

high mtn

Why

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Hmtn

Dude wtf how

 

[soggra]

Why

Short lower third and face too wide

 

[Deleted member 168392]

chadlite easy, best looking guy out of every 100 asians

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Short lower third and face too wide

That only fucks over his harmony his misc and ang are still good

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

chadlite easy, best looking guy out of every 100 asians

Best looking guy out every 100,000 Asians lol and he’s a high htn

 

[Deleted member 168392]

Best looking guy out every 100,000 Asians lol and he’s a high htn

So we’re js making up numbers now…. he’s CL

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

beutiful

 

[greycel]

Science usually has it that way. Like for example Lucas Karger has a 9 dimo 8 ang 9 misc but a 5 harmony. So he’s high Cl. If I wear to just focus on his strong points like say fuck harmony and just give him chad that wouldnt fit the aesthetic stand point. Why? Bc harmony brings all of that together and prevents u from having that “uncanny” look. Or vise versa 5 ang 5 dimo misc but 9 harmony that’s still low htn bc he just looks like a normie in that case like nothing stands out

Three things. They are interdependent + splits would vary by person + the more factors you consider the wider the variance, which is why your rates are so inconsistent

If I told somebody rate this girl using just 2 factors (2 scales 0-10).. it would be out of 20.
First guy might go for a 6 then a 7 = 13, 6.5. Second goes for 7 then 8 =15, 7.5. All the way up to 100 guys..
But now if I add 10 factors, and asked 100 people, on average the ratings between one person and another might average out (because it's a bell curve too), but there's a wider range for difference because it's out of 10 factors × 0-10 scoring system = 100 potential points.
Visualize a flattened bell curve:

Other than the factors containing influence from others + splits being wrong, you have 4 factors which is too many compared to somebody who's using 1 scale: your rates will be inconsistent
Each factor is fundamentally subjective (ultimately it's you deciding what score it closely relates to 4x the amount the average person does - using 1 scale)

 

[Klasik616]

I think hes high htn
View attachment 4200258View attachment 4200259View attachment 4200260

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

Wide faced bloated gook with ethnic features

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Three things. They are interdependent + splits would vary by person + the more factors you consider the wider the variance, which is why your rates are so inconsistent

If I told somebody rate this girl using just 2 factors (2 scales 0-10).. it would be out of 20.
First guy might go for a 6 then a 7 = 13, 6.5. Second goes for 7 then 8 =15, 7.5. All the way up to 100 guys..
But now if I add 10 factors, and asked 100 people, on average the ratings between one person and another might average out (because it's a bell curve too), but there's a wider range for difference because it's out of 10 factors × 0-10 scoring system = 100 potential points.


Other than the factors containing influence from others + splits being wrong, you have 4 factors which is too many compared to somebody who's using 1 scale: your rates will be inconsistent
Each factor is fundamentally subjective (ultimately it's you deciding what score it closely relates to 4x the amount the average person does - using 1 scale)

What you just described is the sex appeal standards Wich yes it’s a good way to rate both and women based one there appeal. BUT what I’m preaching aesthetics/psl. It’s been a known thing that all pro raters use 4 categories. Bc us humans have 4 categories in attraction wich is our angularity (facial sharpness), harmony (ratios), dimo (for men features and robustness of the face for women features, ratios and cheek bone projection) and misc wich is our health indicators and features. That’s why it’s important to use 4 categories

 

[greycel]

What you just described is the sex appeal standards Wich yes it’s a good way to rate both and women based one there appeal. BUT what I’m preaching aesthetics/psl. It’s been a known thing that all pro raters use 4 categories. Bc us humans have 4 categories in attraction wich is our angularity (facial sharpness), harmony (ratios), dimo (for men features and robustness of the face for women features, ratios and cheek bone projection) and misc wich is our health indicators and features. That’s why it’s important to use 4 categories

Forget about it

 

[widdi]

Three things. They are interdependent + splits would vary by person + the more factors you consider the wider the variance, which is why your rates are so inconsistent

If I told somebody rate this girl using just 2 factors (2 scales 0-10).. it would be out of 20.
First guy might go for a 6 then a 7 = 13, 6.5. Second goes for 7 then 8 =15, 7.5. All the way up to 100 guys..
But now if I add 10 factors, and asked 100 people, on average the ratings between one person and another might average out (because it's a bell curve too), but there's a wider range for difference because it's out of 10 factors × 0-10 scoring system = 100 potential points.
Visualize a flattened bell curve:
View attachment 4200364


Other than the factors containing influence from others + splits being wrong, you have 4 factors which is too many compared to somebody who's using 1 scale: your rates will be inconsistent
Each factor is fundamentally subjective (ultimately it's you deciding what score it closely relates to 4x the amount the average person does - using 1 scale)

No they’d be more consistent because deviations from the true value on any scale would be more likely to cancel out when taking a mean if error is random

 

[GynoGladiator]

HLTN too GOOK looking

 

[blkpild]

Changlite fs

 

[greycel]

No they’d be more consistent because deviations from the true value on any scale would be more likely to cancel out when taking a mean if error is random

Variance would be higher because potential range is higher.. leading to more inconsistencies
Average doesn't exist in this case, he's the only guy doing it
You might be meaning average of categories, all containing bias from the same individual

Imagine the bell curve squashed, with the total area under kept the same.. the area under what's further from the middle will increase

 

[lastofus123]

Cl

 

[zaebalsya]

mid cl

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

No they’d be more consistent because deviations from the true value on any scale would be more likely to cancel out when taking a mean if error is random

This.

 

[MyDreamIsToBe183CM]

I think hes high htn
View attachment 4200258View attachment 4200259View attachment 4200260

@pfl @Glorious King @slaters @lastofus123 @Jason Voorhees

Ltn

Pretty boy pill is law

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Changlite fs

View attachment 4200441mid cl

Cl

He would be Cl of his cheekbones were higher set having low set cheekbones cap your ang at 7

 

[GynoGladiator]

How tall is he?

 

[lastofus123]

He would be Cl of his cheekbones were higher set having low set cheekbones cap your ang at 7

Asians have low set cheekbones

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

How tall is he?

6’2

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Asians have low set cheekbones

No? A lot of them have highest all the changes have high set cheekbones bones

 

[widdi]

Variance would be higher because potential range is higher.. leading to more inconsistencies
Average doesn't exist in this case, he's the only guy doing it
You might be meaning average of categories, all containing bias from the same individual

Imagine the bell curve squashed, with the total area under kept the same.. the area under what's further from the middle will increase

The range is the same because he’s normalizing the rates to a /10 scale to get the final rating

The way he normalizes is by taking a weighted mean of each scale

So yeah he’s taking an average, which means underrates from the latent true value on any individual would partially cancel out overrates on another scale

 

[MyDreamIsToBe183CM]

He’s ugly as fuck no girl woupd
Choose hik
Irl

 

[lastofus123]

No? A lot of them have highest all the changes have high set cheekbones bones

True ngl but they never have hollow cheeks

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

He’s ugly as fuck no girl woupd
Choose hik
Irl

Mogs u