Rate this main character Asian

[Ältai.Anabolic]

ran him on Tinder, he got unlimited matches on every swipe in Europe

 

[deadmau154]

Changlite

 

[Ältai.Anabolic]

@PEENO08 this subhuman, is like unevolved ape next to him

 

[PEENO08]

Changlite

So overall equivalent to white ltn in terms of aesthetics and smv

 

[PEENO08]

View attachment 4478587View attachment 4478588


ran him on Tinder, he got unlimited matches on every swipe in Europe

Lmtn

 

[Ältai.Anabolic]

So overall equivalent to white ltn in terms of aesthetics and smv

Lmtn

in what universe a lmtn will get 80% matches rate on Tinder as a man in Europe

 

[PEENO08]

in what universe a lmtn will get 80% matches rate on Tinder as a man in Europe

Show proof or tales

 

[Deleted member 295359]

View attachment 4478587View attachment 4478588


ran him on Tinder, he got unlimited matches on every swipe in Europe

changlite is globally still HHTN level realistically though

 

[YouDoYou]

1. https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_di...ubs/caravel/archive/2022/2022_dateability.php

Attractiveness​

Results showed that there was a significant main effect of the sex of the individual in the picture, F (1, 112) = 102.432, p <0.001 with females being rated as more attractive than males, and a main effect of the race of the individual in the picture, F (1, 112) = 7.085, p =0.009 on attractiveness ratings with whites being rated as more attractive than Asians. There was a marginal interaction between the two factors, F (1, 112) = 5.277, p = 0.023. Attractiveness ratings were higher for Asian females (M = 4.24; SD =1.88) relative to White females (M = 4.17; SD =1.76), but lower for Asian males (M = 3.06; SD = 1.68) relative to White males (M = 3.50; SD = 1.65). Together with results from masculinity ratings, these data imply that ratings of attractiveness might be dependent on phenotypic prototypes of masculine and feminine traits. The attractiveness of sexually dimorphic faces may cue characteristics important in mate choice such as health or dominance. (See Rhodes, 2006, for review.) There were no significant effects associated with the sex of the participants (p-values >0.05), suggesting that ratings of attractiveness were consistent across all participants, regardless of their own biological sex. (Figure 3).

You wops and dagos pretend an Asian chad is a white MTN but the actual difference in attractiveness ratings in formal academic research was 1/3 of a standard deviation. That's like a 1" height difference, 0.33" cock difference, or a 5 IQ point difference (actually it's even lower, it's 0.2619 standard deviations)

This guy mogs. I technically have better bone structure, but he social status, style, fashion, and valuemogs me to oblivion