Reason why foids obsess over standards such as 6ft > 5'11, age 29 > 30, etc. when it comes to selection of men (intra-female competition, status)

[irrumator praetor]

The difference between 5'11 and 6ft is 1 inch (microscopic basically) and between you being 29 or 30 its 1 year (no greater difference than between 24 and 25) YET.... Women obsess over details like this almost psychotically. Its make or break, life or death (sounds insane, right?). WHY?

Its very simple. What if I told you, they think like CHILDREN. Lets give an example:
You got a new shirt. Nice shirt man! What brand is it?
What you say next matters THE MOST: The difference whether if the brand is nike or gucci, offwhite, etc... matters. 6ft, sub30 years old, is the gucci and off-white, 5'11 and 30 years old is the nike. 5'11 & 30 = Android, 6ft & 29 = Brand new Iphone. Doesn't this sound like braindead monkey-like consoooooomer slave thinking? Yeah well, women are CHRONIC BRAINDEAD CONSUMER SLAVES.

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

"But slight differences like this were only relevant in the middle school and elementary school yard, right?" YES! But also, in the minds of women 24/7. Everything signals status to them through their whole life like its 5th grade, eternally. They are walking grown 5th graders who vote in politics and with their money.

Now the reason for this ISN'T PRACTICAL AT ALL, but its very SIMPLE: intra-female competition. It starts in the school yard and it stays like that forever. You know the saying "bitches always be fighting", well I don't need to write more about this topic as you already know. But thats the purpose that STATUS serves for these women, beyond just listening and obeying authority for survival, status serves as competition between women.

Also if a bunch of women gather online as societal authority to set certain mathematically rare standards for men, then yea, its an open competition between women, and they LITERALLY AGREE TO THE RULES OF THAT COMPETITION . Like winning a teddy bear at a carnival. Brooooooootal, fertility rates are a joke for them. Fate of your nation? A joke. A humble brag in front of the girlies.

So while yes, hypergamy does have a natural role, and attraction too, for certain traits that ensure survival, theres also certainly an element of what Im describing here, spicing things up. Otherwise, no, women aren't rational at all. This is child-like emotional behavior whose purpose is to signal status, for social media etc and making other women below them jealous

 

[Quicksand]

If women stuck to what they say, hypergamy would actually be something tangible

Unfortunately, most of the time, women's standards are quite low

 

[irrumator praetor]

If women stuck to what they say, hypergamy would actually be something tangible

Unfortunately, most of the time, women's standards are quite low

elaborate

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

all the greatest and outward perspective geniuses said this

 

[irrumator praetor]

all the greatest and outward perspective geniuses said this

View attachment 4440248

Its like they're perfect for raising children because they never stop being children themselves

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Its like they're perfect for raising children because they never stop being children themselves

 

[irrumator praetor]

View attachment 4440274

damnnn I fr quoted bro without knowing

 

[Quicksand]

elaborate

Women say they want nice men, they say they want this and that, but the trend seems to be declining, with increasingly feminine men becoming more and more common
It’s not just their fault, mind you

In a society on the brink of decline, some of the first signs of degradation can be found in men because, in evolution, part of the selection is sexual (through male competition) and visible in females only through inheritance in the next generations

I'm not even so sure that the trend towards increasing average height is not going to stop, if not decrease slightly, and IQ will follow a similar trend

Furthermore, trivially speaking, most women have had at least one sexual, if not romantic, experience with a mediocre man

 

[irrumator praetor]

Women say they want nice men, they say they want this and that, but the trend seems to be declining, with increasingly feminine men becoming more and more common
It’s not just their fault, mind you

In a society on the brink of decline, some of the first signs of degradation can be found in men because, in evolution, part of the selection is sexual (through male competition) and visible in females only through inheritance in the next generations

I'm not even so sure that the trend towards increasing average height is not going to stop, if not decrease slightly, and IQ will follow a similar trend

Furthermore, trivially speaking, most women have had at least one sexual, if not romantic, experience with a mediocre man

IQ and height probably go down cuz used up hoes end up having to settle down or with their looksmatch, instead of not being a used up hoe, and just settling with their looksmatch. Dysgenics: solved

 

[irrumator praetor]

View attachment 4440274

I was also gonna say, men end up maturing to the point where they're hyper rational and are too tough on the kid or don't have much time for the kid

 

[irrumator praetor]

That would be the only scenario where foids aren't useless

 

[wewuzaryans134]

foids also overestimate heights because most guys larp about their height, I am 5,9 but get mistaken for 6,0 at my school

 

[Quicksand]

Why am I trying to have serious conversations in here?

 

[irrumator praetor]

foids also overestimate heights because most guys larp about their height, I am 5,9 but get mistaken for 6,0 at my school

that too, other foids are super careful about height

 

[irrumator praetor]

Why am I trying to have serious conversations in here?

Yea tbf i didn't understand your point in your elaboration Im guessing you're saying women aren't following through with their hypergamy? I'm not sure if this is the case

 

[irrumator praetor]

The difference between 5'11 and 6ft is 1 inch (microscopic basically) and between you being 29 or 30 its 1 year (no greater difference than between 24 and 25) YET.... Women obsess over details like this almost psychotically. Its make or break, life or death (sounds insane, right?). WHY?

Its very simple. What if I told you, they think like CHILDREN. Lets give an example:
You got a new shirt. Nice shirt man! What brand is it?
What you say next matters THE MOST: The difference whether if the brand is nike or gucci, offwhite, etc... matters. 6ft, sub30 years old, is the gucci and off-white, 5'11 and 30 years old is the nike. 5'11 & 30 = Android, 6ft & 29 = Brand new Iphone. Doesn't this sound like braindead monkey-like consoooooomer slave thinking? Yeah well, women are CHRONIC BRAINDEAD CONSUMER SLAVES.

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

"But slight differences like this were only relevant in the middle school and elementary school yard, right?" YES! But also, in the minds of women 24/7. Everything signals status to them through their whole life like its 5th grade, eternally. They are walking grown 5th graders who vote in politics and with their money.

Now the reason for this ISN'T PRACTICAL AT ALL, but its very SIMPLE: intra-female competition. It starts in the school yard and it stays like that forever. You know the saying "bitches always be fighting", well I don't need to write more about this topic as you already know. But thats the purpose that STATUS serves for these women, beyond just listening and obeying authority for survival, status serves as competition between women.

Also if a bunch of women gather online as societal authority to set certain mathematically rare standards for men, then yea, its an open competition between women, and they LITERALLY AGREE TO THE RULES OF THAT COMPETITION . Like winning a teddy bear at a carnival. Brooooooootal, fertility rates are a joke for them. Fate of your nation? A joke. A humble brag in front of the girlies.

So while yes, hypergamy does have a natural role, and attraction too, for certain traits that ensure survival, theres also certainly an element of what Im describing here, spicing things up. Otherwise, no, women aren't rational at all. This is child-like emotional behavior whose purpose is to signal status, for social media etc and making other women below them jealous

Im gonna add: just like how you can get away with lying about being 6ft while 5'11, and that being make or break for the foid, so can you buy a replica shirt so that you get that 5th grade high status or when the father buys a good replica and lies to the 5th grader its real and the kid is all happy, thats how women are if you're really 5'11 but tell her you're 6ft. Completely useless, irrational, emotional behavior, childish. ITS FUTILE, JUST LIE

 

[ikramy]

IQ will follow a similar trend

The Flynn effect

 

[irrumator praetor]

So if you're average just lie and fake everything, fraud everything, appearance to women is everything, they eternally view the world through 5th grader aura fucking retarded, and you're supposed to take a modern foid seriously?

 

[irrumator praetor]

This behavior ALONE proves foids are INCAPABLE of reasoning and should not be reasoned with. When they try to "reason" they appeal to authority and status, in this way they are mentally disabled

 

[Elegant]

If women stuck to what they say, hypergamy would actually be something tangible

Unfortunately, most of the time, women's standards are quite low

Hypergamy isn't real and the concept of hypergamy doesn't help men at all, most of the men will find out pretty soon that women date mediocre men all the time if they eventually choose to leave their basement. The "problem" is that when women get too much power and freedom they will just ruin the lives of those mediocre men, because of boredom, hybristophilia, female nature or whatever the fuck you seem fit to describe the cucking that these women commit upon their partners. The catch that many "blackpilled(jfl at this tbh)" mediocre men fail to grasp is that it's not only mediocre men that get their lives ruined by women, it's those nr1 on hypergamy scale chads as well, tom brady, curry, you name it, women having so much power will always lead to destruction, them all flocking to chads would be a much simpler process and easier to control/accept.

 

[ikramy]

Hypergamy isn't real and the concept of hypergamy doesn't help men at all, most of the men will find out pretty soon that women date mediocre men all the time if they eventually choose to leave their basement. The "problem" is that when women get too much power and freedom they will just ruin the lives of those mediocre men, because of boredom, hybristophilia, female nature or whatever the fuck you seem fit to describe the cucking that these women commit upon their partners. The catch that many "blackpilled(jfl at this tbh)" mediocre men fail to grasp is that it's not only mediocre men that get their lives ruined by women, it's those nr1 on hypergamy scale chads as well, tom brady, curry, you name it, women having so much power will always lead to destruction, them all flocking to chads would be a much simpler process and easier to control/accept.

not having too much power but having too much boredom and even then they can still be hypergamous btw

 

[irrumator praetor]

Hypergamy isn't real and the concept of hypergamy doesn't help men at all, most of the men will find out pretty soon that women date mediocre men all the time if they eventually choose to leave their basement. The "problem" is that when women get too much power and freedom they will just ruin the lives of those mediocre men, because of boredom, hybristophilia, female nature or whatever the fuck you seem fit to describe the cucking that these women commit upon their partners. The catch that many "blackpilled(jfl at this tbh)" mediocre men fail to grasp is that it's not only mediocre men that get their lives ruined by women, it's those nr1 on hypergamy scale chads as well, tom brady, curry, you name it, women having so much power will always lead to destruction, them all flocking to chads would be a much simpler process and easier to control/accept.

Wtf am I reading bro? All women settling with chads is economically impossible. Yes by definition even with hypergamy they date normies, most women with most men. Although with less commitment this relationship can be more asymmetrical, so most women can try to go for a smaller % of men. Hypergamy primarily fucks with society in how it makes women act, in ways that effect families. Why jfl at blackpilled men?

 

[cartonfoirix]

Women are basically children

You're late

 

[irrumator praetor]

not having too much power but having too much boredom and even then they can still be hypergamous btw

Fym not having too much power WHAT AM I READING?? Does org have a male feminist problem? They literally have the power to destroy families, that's enough power for you?

 

[ikramy]

Wtf am I reading bro? All women settling with chads is economically impossible. Yes by definition even with hypergamy they date normies, most women with most men. Although with less commitment this relationship can be more asymmetrical, so most women can try to go for a smaller % of men. Hypergamy primarily fucks with society in how it makes women act, in ways that effect families. Why jfl at blackpilled men?

They will always date up cause they think they are prettier than what they actually are

 

[irrumator praetor]

Women are basically children

You're late

Yea its water but have you ever seen it explained like this tho

 

[ikramy]

Fym not having too much power WHAT AM I READING?? Does org have a male feminist problem? They literally have the power to destroy families, that's enough power for you?

No you fucking retard, I’m saying the problem isn’t that they have too much power but when they have too much boredom for example you gotta be a fucking ass to her sometimes to keep things interesting or she will ruin you

 

[irrumator praetor]

No you fucking retard, I’m saying the problem isn’t that they have too much power but when they have too much boredom for example you gotta be a fucking ass to her sometimes to keep things interesting or she will ruin you

You're gonna say this and then after saying this, call me a retard . They'll always be bored, issues arose only when they got enough power. Why are we having this discussion, this should be obvious. Are you a foid?

 

[Elegant]

They will always date up cause they think they are prettier than what they actually are

incel cope, leave ur house and look around

Wtf am I reading bro? All women settling with chads is economically impossible. Yes by definition even with hypergamy they date normies, most women with most men. Although with less commitment this relationship can be more asymmetrical, so most women can try to go for a smaller % of men. Hypergamy primarily fucks with society in how it makes women act, in ways that effect families. Why jfl at blackpilled men?

Hypergamy is only dating up in social status/looks or whatever, if they aren't choosing to stay single because of it being economically impossible how is it legitimate then? Them being awful towards their mediocre husbands because they are mediocre but still dating them and not dating chad is not hypergamy, it's just not being content with this world and disliking the cards you were "dealt(not really the case for women these days)", p.s. women always dislike their cards if they are the ones choosing them, it's only playable if you force them to use the cards you give them.

jfl at blackpilled men because people that proudly spout about muh hypergamy or whatever are not blackpilled and are just socially outcasted normies

 

[ikramy]

You got a nigger iq, op

 

[ikramy]

incel cope, leave ur house and look around

I’m not coping for example ask some fat bitches how’d they rate themselves they always rate themselves higher than average or average which is not true

 

[Elegant]

I’m not coping for example ask some fat bitches how’d they rate themselves they always rate themselves higher than average or average which is not true

do you expect them to proudly say yes i am a fat subhuman whale or?

 

[irrumator praetor]

incel cope, leave ur house and look around

Hypergamy is only dating up in social status/looks or whatever, if they aren't choosing to stay single because of it being economically impossible how is it legitimate then? Them being awful towards their mediocre husbands because they are mediocre but still dating them and not dating chad is not hypergamy, it's just not being content with this world and disliking the cards you were "dealt(not really the case for women these days)", p.s. women always dislike their cards if they are the ones choosing them, it's only playable if you force them to use the cards you give them.

jfl at blackpilled men because people that proudly spout about muh hypergamy or whatever are not blackpilled and are just socially outcasted normies

Right, yea I agree. Most men are rubbed the wrong way because of the way women started behaving after our modern pseudo-hypergamy

 

[Elegant]

Right, yea I agree. Most men are rubbed the wrong way because of the way women started behaving after our modern pseudo-hypergamy

We should just treat it as them being defective beings that are "hypergamous" to the idea of just creating trouble/being loyal only to their feelings which needs to be controlled by force because of how destructive it is.

 

[ikramy]

do you expect them to proudly say yes i am a fat subhuman whale or?

Nope but they genuinely do think so and then think they deserve better than their actual looksmatch most of the time

 

[ikramy]

controlled by force

Like physically ? Or wdym ?

 

[DrunkenSailor]

You might be right op

Just that i dnr

 

[irrumator praetor]

p.s. women always dislike their cards if they are the ones choosing them, it's only playable if you force them to use the cards you give them.

Oh also is this a reference to arranged marriage or western way of matrimony that happened before the dating culture? In that case I agree

 

[irrumator praetor]

We should just treat it as them being defective beings that are "hypergamous" to the idea of just creating trouble/being loyal only to their feelings which needs to be controlled by force because of how destructive it is.

Totally agree

 

[irrumator praetor]

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

This is because men have less status, because they have less authority over the women now. And women only view authority and status as human, or something to consider. Low status = subhuman for them, "dog on a leash", "invisible" etc. They don't consider you serious in conversation unless you can beat them up (or like the government/authorities throw them into jail), therefore they don't respect you either. So unless they can respect you, then you're literally just an object (iphone or android), theres no humanity in you (you're either trash or a speaking vibrator).

 

[CHRIST_764]

Ignore attempts at feminization and mouth tape girls while you fuck them so they cant express any pleasure

 

[irrumator praetor]

Lower status = not a threat, no authority = you're an object, either piece of invisible trash OR a talking vibrator/"golden retriever" (jfl) = you're not alive or a human

 

[irrumator praetor]

Ignore attempts at feminization and mouth tape girls while you fuck them so they cant express any pleasure

Yea chainsaw them before they get a chance to orgasm, satirically in minecraft

 

[CHRIST_764]

Yea chainsaw them before they get a chance to orgasm

Yep u have to avoid slapping them or small shit like that because they will actually enjoy it

 

[...!]

The difference between 5'11 and 6ft is 1 inch (microscopic basically) and between you being 29 or 30 its 1 year (no greater difference than between 24 and 25) YET.... Women obsess over details like this almost psychotically. Its make or break, life or death (sounds insane, right?). WHY?

Its very simple. What if I told you, they think like CHILDREN. Lets give an example:
You got a new shirt. Nice shirt man! What brand is it?
What you say next matters THE MOST: The difference whether if the brand is nike or gucci, offwhite, etc... matters. 6ft, sub30 years old, is the gucci and off-white, 5'11 and 30 years old is the nike. 5'11 & 30 = Android, 6ft & 29 = Brand new Iphone. Doesn't this sound like braindead monkey-like consoooooomer slave thinking? Yeah well, women are CHRONIC BRAINDEAD CONSUMER SLAVES.

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

"But slight differences like this were only relevant in the middle school and elementary school yard, right?" YES! But also, in the minds of women 24/7. Everything signals status to them through their whole life like its 5th grade, eternally. They are walking grown 5th graders who vote in politics and with their money.

Now the reason for this ISN'T PRACTICAL AT ALL, but its very SIMPLE: intra-female competition. It starts in the school yard and it stays like that forever. You know the saying "bitches always be fighting", well I don't need to write more about this topic as you already know. But thats the purpose that STATUS serves for these women, beyond just listening and obeying authority for survival, status serves as competition between women.

Also if a bunch of women gather online as societal authority to set certain mathematically rare standards for men, then yea, its an open competition between women, and they LITERALLY AGREE TO THE RULES OF THAT COMPETITION . Like winning a teddy bear at a carnival. Brooooooootal, fertility rates are a joke for them. Fate of your nation? A joke. A humble brag in front of the girlies.

So while yes, hypergamy does have a natural role, and attraction too, for certain traits that ensure survival, theres also certainly an element of what Im describing here, spicing things up. Otherwise, no, women aren't rational at all. This is child-like emotional behavior whose purpose is to signal status, for social media etc and making other women below them jealous

I hate women but at the same time I want one it’s a never ending cycle

 

[irrumator praetor]

I hate women but at the same time I want one it’s a never ending cycle

You want to FUCK one, not talk to her or waste time on her. Ideally you'd only fuck and thats it. Thats why my ideal goal are booty calls only, no dating faggot cucking bullshit

 

[notagreycell]

The difference between 5'11 and 6ft is 1 inch (microscopic basically) and between you being 29 or 30 its 1 year (no greater difference than between 24 and 25) YET.... Women obsess over details like this almost psychotically. Its make or break, life or death (sounds insane, right?). WHY?

Its very simple. What if I told you, they think like CHILDREN. Lets give an example:
You got a new shirt. Nice shirt man! What brand is it?
What you say next matters THE MOST: The difference whether if the brand is nike or gucci, offwhite, etc... matters. 6ft, sub30 years old, is the gucci and off-white, 5'11 and 30 years old is the nike. 5'11 & 30 = Android, 6ft & 29 = Brand new Iphone. Doesn't this sound like braindead monkey-like consoooooomer slave thinking? Yeah well, women are CHRONIC BRAINDEAD CONSUMER SLAVES.

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

"But slight differences like this were only relevant in the middle school and elementary school yard, right?" YES! But also, in the minds of women 24/7. Everything signals status to them through their whole life like its 5th grade, eternally. They are walking grown 5th graders who vote in politics and with their money.

Now the reason for this ISN'T PRACTICAL AT ALL, but its very SIMPLE: intra-female competition. It starts in the school yard and it stays like that forever. You know the saying "bitches always be fighting", well I don't need to write more about this topic as you already know. But thats the purpose that STATUS serves for these women, beyond just listening and obeying authority for survival, status serves as competition between women.

Also if a bunch of women gather online as societal authority to set certain mathematically rare standards for men, then yea, its an open competition between women, and they LITERALLY AGREE TO THE RULES OF THAT COMPETITION . Like winning a teddy bear at a carnival. Brooooooootal, fertility rates are a joke for them. Fate of your nation? A joke. A humble brag in front of the girlies.

So while yes, hypergamy does have a natural role, and attraction too, for certain traits that ensure survival, theres also certainly an element of what Im describing here, spicing things up. Otherwise, no, women aren't rational at all. This is child-like emotional behavior whose purpose is to signal status, for social media etc and making other women below them jealous

Mirin thread cant believe no one has said this before when it should have been said

 

[irrumator praetor]

Mirin thread cant believe no one has said this before when it should have been said

Thanks bhai. Niggas always say "bitches are children" but never elaborate how, they just say they're always acting childish in general. Well now we pinpoint exactly how they act in the manner of a child

 

[glaruz]

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself.

This is why they talk so much about men objectifying them. It is literal projection of their own thinking.

This is kinda overlooked in bp space, where foid "attraction" is not only based on biology, but also on the way they get perceived by others (trends could create exceptions from the typical beauty standard). THEIR bfs are exactly like an item they flex to others.

One way to get an insight into their mindset. They constantly imagine and think about how they look from a third person view. You can see this narcyness in videos especially. Their look towards the camera/ third person view.

 

[irrumator praetor]

The difference between 5'11 and 6ft is 1 inch (microscopic basically) and between you being 29 or 30 its 1 year (no greater difference than between 24 and 25) YET.... Women obsess over details like this almost psychotically. Its make or break, life or death (sounds insane, right?). WHY?

Its very simple. What if I told you, they think like CHILDREN. Lets give an example:
You got a new shirt. Nice shirt man! What brand is it?
What you say next matters THE MOST: The difference whether if the brand is nike or gucci, offwhite, etc... matters. 6ft, sub30 years old, is the gucci and off-white, 5'11 and 30 years old is the nike. 5'11 & 30 = Android, 6ft & 29 = Brand new Iphone. Doesn't this sound like braindead monkey-like consoooooomer slave thinking? Yeah well, women are CHRONIC BRAINDEAD CONSUMER SLAVES.

And yes that also means they objectify men as if men are their possession, consumer item. Like a dog, or an iphone. Like a WEDDING RING, or wedding photos, or the wedding itself. You're not ALIVE to women unless your face makes them wet, then you're just a vibrator that speaks. You're still a dog on a leash, brutal. And, as a matter of fact, you are that indeed, because the law makes you so, practically your legal status is "a dog on a leash".

"But slight differences like this were only relevant in the middle school and elementary school yard, right?" YES! But also, in the minds of women 24/7. Everything signals status to them through their whole life like its 5th grade, eternally. They are walking grown 5th graders who vote in politics and with their money.

Now the reason for this ISN'T PRACTICAL AT ALL, but its very SIMPLE: intra-female competition. It starts in the school yard and it stays like that forever. You know the saying "bitches always be fighting", well I don't need to write more about this topic as you already know. But thats the purpose that STATUS serves for these women, beyond just listening and obeying authority for survival, status serves as competition between women.

Also if a bunch of women gather online as societal authority to set certain mathematically rare standards for men, then yea, its an open competition between women, and they LITERALLY AGREE TO THE RULES OF THAT COMPETITION . Like winning a teddy bear at a carnival. Brooooooootal, fertility rates are a joke for them. Fate of your nation? A joke. A humble brag in front of the girlies.

So while yes, hypergamy does have a natural role, and attraction too, for certain traits that ensure survival, theres also certainly an element of what Im describing here, spicing things up. Otherwise, no, women aren't rational at all. This is child-like emotional behavior whose purpose is to signal status, for social media etc and making other women below them jealous

that also means that when the "oppressive patriarchy" force-matched them with their looksmatch, on the contrary to feminist mythology, since the man had authority and respect, they WERE sexually aroused by him.

You DIDN'T need to mog her to oblivion just so that you got human treatment! And it wasn't like they were being held hostage by the taliban. Who would've thought?

When they're fucking a guy, its the STATUS that turns them on, as well as sexual attraction via dimorphic features: the fact hes 6ft and not 5'11, or the fact hes on the sports team in your highschool, or whatever stupid BS that doesn't add or detract much from his real SMV.

Its like a collection of little copes she call tell herself over and over again to feel better after having sex with you "wow i just had sex with him and hes 6ft, go girl" or "wow I just had sex with him and hes the best on the sports team" consciously or subconsciously (they keep it in the back of their head) your labels MATTER (just like an iphone or designer clothing, literally your social labels).

So women view the world as human and nonhuman through respect/status, and if you have no power over them, don't mog them or have higher status than them, then you're invisible and nonhuman. They perceive threat through status, thus also their own survival, and adjust how they behave according to that.

Otherwise you have stupid shit like, war veteran chad wives leaving them after they get injured in a war, etc totally illogical and irrational, but because the state isn't strongly protecting that veteran legally (putting the bitch in her place and giving the veteran proper respect, benefits and praise to the veteran thus status) shes able to and WILL (without consequence) leave that veteran. Society nor the state respect his sacrifice, surely now he must be a total loser!