Reason why foids obsess over standards such as 6ft > 5'11, age 29 > 30, etc. when it comes to selection of men (intra-female competition, status)

[...!]

You want to FUCK one, not talk to her or waste time on her. Ideally you'd only fuck and thats it. Thats why my ideal goal are booty calls only, no dating faggot cucking bullshit

no i want a family and have kids with a women who loves me but these hoes piss me off

 

[irrumator praetor]

This is why they talk so much about men objectifying them. It is literal projection of their own thinking.

This is kinda overlooked in bp space, where foid "attraction" is not only based on biology, but also on the way they get perceived by others (trends could create exceptions from the typical beauty standard). THEIR bfs are exactly like an item they flex to others.

One way to get an insight into their mindset. They constantly imagine and think about how they look from a third person view. You can see this narcyness in videos especially. Their look towards the camera/ third person view.

yep, that's also why they obsess over shit like jewelery, while most men don't unless its to flex some super expensive golden chain as like a flaunt of wealth. But even then its more rare lol. Bitches are a lot more obsessed over stuff like that then men, you can see it in fashion... Anthropology discovered it was primarily the bitches making stupid useless shit like bracelets etc.. probably to decorate themselves and signal higher status than other foids who couldn't make shit like that. Grown children

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

Its like they're perfect for raising children because they never stop being children themselves

Women fall in love with men who make them feel like a child

All my girlfriends told me i did that to them

 

[acm]

read every word

im not exactly adding much to this thread, but it should be said that even when you're trying to talk to one, you need to treat them like a kid. the way people phrase is it like you talk about "dumb shit", like you're babysitting your friends 9 year old kid. you go on a date with them on the park? WRONG. you're actually babysitting a child, and you better be an entertaining little fucking jester for her before she moves onto the next.

hence why you don't sit there and talk to them about politics, philosophy and shit. in foid language, it's an "ick" but its just their child fuckinf brains not being stimulated because it's an deep topic and not something childish like tv/movie, food, animals etc.

 

[sub5outsider]

all the greatest and outward perspective geniuses said this

View attachment 4440248

Women never change the only thing that change is their priorities .

 

[Quicksand]

Women can express their fantasies much more easily (although I doubt that many of them are actually aware of what they like)

For some reason, when a woman says, “I like nice guys”, she is rightly labelled a liar, but the same woman is taken overly seriously when she talks about the physical characteristics she would like in a man

Of course, the two things are different, but not that different.

 

[Whatever]

This is kinda cope, they only bring this arbitrary bullshit in as an explanation for rejecting guys they didn’t even choose in the first place, or to ease sorting through the trillions of guys on the apps. But if she sees a guy who she actually likes she’s not gonna card him or get out a tape measure, she already decided.

 

[irrumator praetor]

This is kinda cope, they only bring this arbitrary bullshit in as an explanation for rejecting guys they didn’t even choose in the first place, or to ease sorting through the trillions of guys on the apps. But if she sees a guy who she actually likes she’s not gonna card him or get out a tape measure, she already decided.

Yea this can also be the case, well often times it is. But surely we've seen examples of women turning down men they would (or seemed to be) interested in, because of a "label" (5'11 instead of 6ft, etc).

It actually is no question whether a 5ft4 foid would be interested in a guy taller than her, lets say 5ft7 or 8, but hes sub 6ft. So naturally she'd be turned on by that guy, there is proper dimorphism compared to her, but because hes not 6ft, you know, the magic label or universal female requirement, then hes out. Even if he has a good face card. So clearly we can see what Im talking about, taking place. This is the most obvious example though, second to 5'11 vs 6ft, oftentimes this element is subtle with females. Hence I had to use a bunch of comparisons to point it out

Also, in nature, all women are attracted to when it comes to height, is the guy being taller than her. They never had a magic 6ft number or tape measure. They always had, I guess, an estimation of what approximate height is above average. But did they even have that concept back then? Or could they afford to care? Its already been confirmed all they mostly care about is that the man is 1-2 inches taller than them (maybe even their height) when we know this is the natural gender, on average, height difference. So then if thats the case, why the magic 6ft number?

 

[irrumator praetor]

Women can express their fantasies much more easily (although I doubt that many of them are actually aware of what they like)

For some reason, when a woman says, “I like nice guys”, she is rightly labelled a liar, but the same woman is taken overly seriously when she talks about the physical characteristics she would like in a man

Of course, the two things are different, but not that different.

True that, but they still apply these standards in their pseudo-hypergamous dating, or at least they try their best. They only don't apply as much when it comes to matchmaking for bearing kids/LTR/marriage.

 

[irrumator praetor]

btw guys lets tone it down with the denial of hypergamy because we do have real life data on how it (at least) effects dating, if not, marriage also