REDDITCUCKS SEETHING THAT AI IS ABOUT TO MOG FORENSIC ARTISTS' FACIAL RECONS AFTER MAKING ARTISTS NEETS

WHOSE FORENSIC ART MOGS?

  • Total voters
    31
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31155
Xangsane said:
Someone who draws sketches/clay sculptures of suspects/unidentified dead bodies
Click to expand...
woah so basically they will use robots to catch criminals faster?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
@thecel
 
@thecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Xangsane
REDDIT CUCKS.

WE, AS LOOKSMAX.ORG, WILL CONTINUE TO CHURN OUT AI-GENERATED COMPOSITES.

FUCK YOU NORMSCUM.

1690758657718
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19994
@Manu le coq @SubHumanHere @RODEBLUR

JFL AT THESE CUCK MODS ON SHITTIT CRACKING DOWN ON AI-GEN RECONS DONE BY ZOOMERS

New rule regarding facial reconstructions​

renderTimingPixel.png

Hi everyone! We have decided to change the rules regarding facial reconstructions. From now on, anyone posting their own self-made recons must provide proof to the moderators that they have professional experience in the field of forensic art. This means that at least one of your recons has been used/publicized before by a law enforcement agency, NamUs, or an officially established volunteer group like The Doe Network or the DNA Doe Project.
A facial reconstruction is one of the most important tools in identifying a John or Jane Doe. It’s going to be the first thing that comes to mind when people think about a Doe, and people often make decisions about how viable a potential match is based on how well the missing person compares to the recon. To do one properly, you need years of art experience and extensive knowledge of both human anatomy (at least as it relates to the face and head) and how postmortem changes and injuries can cause even subtle differences in a person’s appearance that you need to account for. These are things that require hundreds (thousands?) of hours of study to learn and become proficient in.
The other issue is that, oftentimes, certain aspects of a person’s appearance are left up to the artist’s discretion because they simply don’t have enough soft tissue to go off of. Particularly the eyes, lips, and tip of the nose. If so, these details could very well be inaccurate, and if someone is drawing from that recon to make their own new one (especially when they don’t have the relevant experience), they could easily end up with one that’s even more inaccurate than the first.
For these reasons, we believe that there is too much room for error and and too much potential to accidentally mislead (in the form of a bad recon) to keep allowing people to post their own work unless they have experience in this field. We understand everyone has to start somewhere, and we appreciate the time and effort that well-intentioned posters have put into making recons. But our primary goal on this sub is discussing and identifying John and Jane Does, and what happens on Reddit doesn’t stay on Reddit, and we don’t want to post something that could be wrong and (god forbid) have people overlook a match because so-and-so doesn’t look like a recon that was posted on Reddit and then reposted by someone else on another site like the Unidentified wikia without the disclaimer that the artist wasn’t qualified to do one.
I hope everyone will understand the reasoning for this new rule. Thanks for being such a great community and caring for these John and Jane Does who are too often overlooked.
Verification: In order to get the “Forensic Artist” flair, your work must be used at least once by law enforcement, a medical examiner’s office, or a volunteer organization like The Doe Network or the DNA Doe Project. Send us a modmail heresaying that you’re interested. The easiest way to verify is to email us using your professional email account (we will provide you with an address to email us at). If the recon was done by hand, you could also take a picture that includes both the original artwork and a sheet of paper that has your username and the date. If you want to prove you are a specific forensic artist and there are already photos of you available online, you can also take a selfie holding up a paper that has the username and date. If you’re not able to verify using these methods, please send us a message anyway. We can probably work something out.
Click to expand...
 
Shut up cucks
1690759670889
 
Attractive: from subhuman to LTN
1690759697361
 
SubHumanHere said:
Yeah that's the thing, forensic artist can't draw perfectly while showing ai can do this in matter of seconds and actually make it feel alive, their drawing looks uncanny/not real, look at the face of the guy in the right.
Click to expand...
Here's the thing, they're complaining about how AI makes the UIDs more attractive.
 
0
 
Xangsane said:
@Manu le coq @SubHumanHere @RODEBLUR

JFL AT THESE CUCK MODS ON SHITTIT CRACKING DOWN ON AI-GEN RECONS DONE BY ZOOMERS
Click to expand...
I mean honestly the pics you posted looked like reality tv ads
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
@HeightPilledum
 
Xangsane said:
why?
Click to expand...
Cause they look like they're posing for a fucking photoshoot keep it professional at the very least. I know they're coping and trying to keep their hustle afloat but at least use an AI model that doesn't make them look like a fucking photoshopped pornstar
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
RODEBLUR said:
Cause they look like they're posing for a fucking photoshoot keep it professional at the very least. I know they're coping and trying to keep their hustle afloat but at least use an AI model that doesn't make them look like a fucking photoshopped pornstar
Click to expand...
Randomly generated clothes and poses JFL.
It seems the poses change depending on the attractiveness of the person.
 
RODEBLUR said:
Cause they look like they're posing for a fucking photoshoot keep it professional at the very least. I know they're coping and trying to keep their hustle afloat but at least use an AI model
Click to expand...
What films do they look like they could be in then?
1690764329023
 
@emeraldglass thoughts?
RODEBLUR said:
Cause they look like they're posing for a fucking photoshoot keep it professional at the very least. I know they're coping and trying to keep their hustle afloat but at least use an AI model that doesn't make them look like a fucking photoshopped pornstar
Click to expand...
Xangsane said:
Randomly generated clothes and poses JFL.
It seems the poses change depending on the attractiveness of the person.
Click to expand...
 
Xangsane said:
Exactly. Don't know why Reddittards are seething. They'll also say "muh he looks too attractive".

What do you think of this comparison?

Left: forensic artist (credit: Samantha Steinberg)
Right: AI (credit: Looksmax.org, Midjourney)

View attachment 2351315View attachment 2351317

This is the same decedent.
Click to expand...
@emeraldglass did her PSL increase, decreasae or remain the same?
 
  • +1
Reactions: emeraldglass
Xangsane said:
@emeraldglass did her PSL increase, decreasae or remain the same?
Click to expand...
Somewhat same. But they dont really look that much close.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
tbh why the fuck sould we care? cashiers all across the world ave been loosing their jobs to self checkout machines but they draw the line at this?
 
Cage at dead subhumans
 
Xangsane said:
You

What are her failos to be a LTB and not MTB?

Yes they're losing their minds on reddit. Reddit users are terrified of NEETdom

Why?
Click to expand...
She is moderately attractive, but just barely. Her mouth corners are downturned, eyebrows sparse, neck thick, and eye corners asymmetrical. In real life, she could be a 4 on the PSL scale or even higher. However, judging from this picture, which is not the best quality, I would rate her as MTB.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
emeraldglass said:
She is moderately attractive, but just barely. Her mouth corners are downturned, eyebrows sparse, neck thick, and eye corners asymmetrical. In real life, she could be a 4 on the PSL scale or even higher. However, judging from this picture, which is not the best quality, I would rate her as MTB.
Click to expand...
Is this from the AI or the official sketch?
 
Xangsane said:
JFL AT THESE REDDIT CUCKS
View attachment 2351151View attachment 2351152View attachment 2351153
THEY'RE SEETHING THAT AI HAS NOT ONLY MOGGED ARTISTS BUT WILL BE COMING TO MOG FORENSIC ARTISTS TOO. PEOPLE (MAINLY ZOOMERS) HAVE GOTTEN INTO TROUBLE FOR POSTING AI-GENERATED FORENSIC ART ON CUCKIT.

ALL IT DOES IS MAKES THE PERSON LESS UNCANNY COMPARED TO THE CLAY SCULPTURES/OFFICIAL RECONSTRUCTIONS, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY DEBLOATS THEM (AS THEY'RE LYING DOWN AND BLOATING IS A STAGE OF DECOMPOSITION) AND PUSHES THE MAXILLA SLIGHTLY FORWARD AS IF THEY WERE STANDING UP.

HERE ARE EXAMPLES OF FORENSIC ART, DONE BY TRAINED FORENSIC ARTISTS:
View attachment 2351263View attachment 2351267

TAKE THIS, WHICH IS OFFICIAL FORENSIC ART, DONE BY A TRAINED FORENSIC ARTIST (HE LOOKS HALF DEAD IN THIS):
View attachment 2351229

VERSUS AI-GENERATED FORENSIC ART, TAKEN FROM THE CORPSE OF THE DECEDENT AND OFFICIAL UNCANNY, UNSETTLING RECONS, DRAWN BY LOOKSMAX.ORG USERS. THE PSL OF THE DECEDENTS SHOWN BELOW WERE KEPT THE SAME. BOTH DECEDENTS DIED IN THE LATE 1970S AND EARLY 1990S RESPECTIVELY:

View attachment 2351230View attachment 2351269View attachment 2351232View attachment 2351270

JFL AT THIS CUCK APOLOGIZING. THERE WASN'T ANY NEED TO APOLOGIZE, AI HAS COME TO MAKE THESE FORENSIC ARTISTS NEETS.

View attachment 2351175

IT'S OVER FOR FORENSICARTISTCELS.
Click to expand...
I can still find out if the picture is fake or not it’s not that hard for any digital forensic examiner. Infact you could even find it and you don’t need a single software it’s all reverse image searching. And if that’s not even ought to em you can always examine the properties of the picture
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
PrinceLuenLeoncur said:
I can still find out if the picture is fake or not it’s not that hard for any digital forensic examiner. Infact you could even find it and you don’t need a single software it’s all reverse image searching. And if that’s not even ought to em you can always examine the properties of the picture
Click to expand...
Nah it's not that, redditors are seething over zoomers using AI to create facial reconstructions from corpses from unidentified bodies, and would prefer disturbing and uncanny sketches from trained forensic scientists to be the only ones used.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
Xangsane said:
Randomly generated clothes and poses JFL.
It seems the poses change depending on the attractiveness of the person.
Click to expand...
Well then ''randomly generate'' this AI to be more professional because we're talking about fucking dead people here
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
0
 
RODEBLUR said:
First one looks like she could be in some grimy hot hacker girl movie second looks like he's straight off of Love Island

Why ask
Click to expand...
Caging at the descriptions
 
RODEBLUR said:
Well then ''randomly generate'' this AI to be more professional because we're talking about fucking dead people here
Click to expand...
Exactly, AI needs to be improved in this case
 
  • +1
Reactions: RODEBLUR
@HarrierDuBois
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Xangsane
  • Poll
Discussion Which of these John/Jane Doe sketches looks like it's been taken from a corpse?
Replies
35
Views
479
Xangsane
Xangsane

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 3)
Back
Top