REMINDER: GYM-MAXXING IS NOT A COPE

[protomogger9873]

I’ve been lifting for two years now, and the difference in perceived SMV is undeniable. Despite what these dumbasses on .org say, women still love musculature IF you’re already good looking.

I’d say that past a certain floor for facial aesthetics, gymmaxxing can serve as a SMV MULTIPLIER. It can multiply your SMV by 1.X percent, with X increasing exponentially as you’re more facially aesthetic.

Furthermore, I theorize that “female gaze bro” is applicable to physiques as LONG AS YOU’RE NATURAL. If you’re natural and sufficiently lean, you will never surpass the female gaze.

Relevant images of me (anecdotal-evidence kungfumaxxed chang ) attached:

 

[Deleted member 94832]

In b4 the rotters say its cope

 

[protomogger9873]

In b4 the rotters say its cope

“yeah bro like the gym is cope and girls dont like muscles, thats why i just hang out in my bedroom and play rust all day”

 

[UrGirlsMcm]

gymmaxing isnt a smv multiplier but it does help it's an added bonus as muscles are dimorphic.

I've been gymmaxing for a while and found the biggest SMV multipliers are genetic such as chest size, insertions, proportions, clavicle length and so on aesthetics matter for the body just as much for the face.

like having wide clavicles with dogshit chest insertions is pointless at that point u get mogged by anyone with decent clavicle length and a full chest

 

[narex054]

I’ve been lifting for two years now, and the difference in perceived SMV is undeniable. Despite what these dumbasses on .org say, women still love musculature IF you’re already good looking.

I’d say that past a certain floor for facial aesthetics, gymmaxxing can serve as a SMV MULTIPLIER. It can multiply your SMV by 1.X percent, with X increasing exponentially as you’re more facially aesthetic.

Furthermore, I theorize that “female gaze bro” is applicable to physiques as LONG AS YOU’RE NATURAL. If you’re natural and sufficiently lean, you will never surpass the female gaze.

Relevant images of me (anecdotal-evidence kungfumaxxed chang ) attached:

Is this ur 2nd account bhai

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Love how you provided exactly zero evidence that it isn't a cope with this being a hypothetical opinion post, not even anecdotal.

Opinion meaning this is just WHAT YOU THINK -- you didn't even give an anecdote, BS or not, proving your main assertion...

Which is that women like it more when you're muscular. So you just made an opinion, showed your body & claim it isn't cope...

But you provided ZERO proof/not even AN ANECDOTE ACCOUNT on if women even LIKE YOU specifically with muscles. Bruh

 

[protomogger9873]

Love how you provided exactly zero evidence that it isn't a cope with this being a hypothetical opinion post, not even anecdotal.

Opinion meaning this is just WHAT YOU THINK -- you didn't even give an anecdote, BS or not, proving your main assertion...

Which is that women like it more when you're muscular. So you just made an opinion, showed your body & claim it isn't cope...

But you provided ZERO proof/not even AN ANECDOTE ACCOUNT on if women even LIKE YOU specifically with muscles. Bruh

dnrd your yap sesh shut up nerd