Bewusst
dead inside
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
- Posts
- 17,156
- Reputation
- 22,268
I recently cut out starches from my diet and replaced them with simple sugars (fruit, honey, molasses, refined sugar etc.) while keeping my daily calorie intake the same and oh boy... I haven't felt this good and energetic in years, both mentally and physically. I still eat in a moderate calorie deficit and only have one meal per day, but eating large amounts of simple sugars makes me feel as if I weren't even doing intermittent fasting. I don't even need caffeine anymore because my energy is through the roof. I still a enjoy a cup or two of black coffee for the taste and warmth, but I don't need it anymore to get me going. I have zero cravings, hunger, lethargy or energy dips during my fasting window.
Many starchy foods like potatoes actually have a higher insulin index than non-starchy sugary foods like honey or dates, which makes them inferior for IF and weight loss, because they spike insulin too much, which results in undesirable blood sugar fluctuations (e.g. reactive hypoglycemia, blood sugar "crash") and makes you feel hungry again soon after your meal. Simple sugars like glucose, sucrose and fructose are also way more satisfying than starch due to the sweetness, which we naturally crave. It's much harder to overeat on simple sugars than on starch. I assume our nutrient sensing systems are better suited for sugar/sweet foods like fruit, which makes sense from an evolutionary point of view, since agriculture hasn't been around for long enough to cause significant adaptations. Eating like this - high sugar, low fat & starch, moderate protein - feels not restrictive at all to me, despite being in a deficit.
Muh "complex carbs are better than simple carbs, because they result in more stable blood sugar levels and provide you with longer lasting energy " gotta be one of the most stupid and undifferentiated commonly reurgitated broscience claims I've ever heard; coming from people who can't even name or distinguish between different types of sugar
Many starchy foods like potatoes actually have a higher insulin index than non-starchy sugary foods like honey or dates, which makes them inferior for IF and weight loss, because they spike insulin too much, which results in undesirable blood sugar fluctuations (e.g. reactive hypoglycemia, blood sugar "crash") and makes you feel hungry again soon after your meal. Simple sugars like glucose, sucrose and fructose are also way more satisfying than starch due to the sweetness, which we naturally crave. It's much harder to overeat on simple sugars than on starch. I assume our nutrient sensing systems are better suited for sugar/sweet foods like fruit, which makes sense from an evolutionary point of view, since agriculture hasn't been around for long enough to cause significant adaptations. Eating like this - high sugar, low fat & starch, moderate protein - feels not restrictive at all to me, despite being in a deficit.
Muh "complex carbs are better than simple carbs, because they result in more stable blood sugar levels and provide you with longer lasting energy " gotta be one of the most stupid and undifferentiated commonly reurgitated broscience claims I've ever heard; coming from people who can't even name or distinguish between different types of sugar
Last edited: