
RODEBLUR
Moyra Forever
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2020
- Posts
- 32,097
- Reputation
- 32,323
Which works best? Or can i take both? Serious question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So are there long-term results with that or notretin a doesn’t burn fat it’s a low iq meme on this forum
it just thins ur skin temporarily before it thickens it so it can give the appearance that you lost fat
long term result is god like skin texture and insane anti-aging. nothing to do with fatSo are there long-term results with that or not
So Retin A won't help me get hollow cheeks then. What about Diureticslong term result is god like skin texture and insane anti-aging. nothing to do with fat
u will never have hollow cheeks until u actually hit puberty man, you are prepubescent as fuck. just wait a few years and see what you look likeSo Retin A won't help me get hollow cheeks then. What about Diuretics
Fucking hell. Atleast i've been retarded enough in school to still be in at 18u will never have hollow cheeks until u actually hit puberty man, you are prepubescent as fuck. just wait a few years and see what you look like
that's why i askedDo you even know what both of these things do?
A diuretic removes water from the body, temporarily. retin a exfoliates the skin and in doing so removes file lines..
And you are still that stupid?that's why i asked
fuck you think
I wish. I lost volume, under eyes. Which I could not afford to lose.long term result is god like skin texture and insane anti-aging. nothing to do with fat
i’ve been using it under eyes and have lost volume but eventually the skin will thicken again and it will improve. just keep at it tbhI wish. I lost volume, under eyes
It's not sue to skin thickness loss in my case. I think.i’ve been using it under eyes and have lost volume but eventually the skin will thicken again and it will improve. just keep at it tbh
are u sure it’s the product and not just natural ageing or something?It's not sue to skin thickness loss in my case. I think.
I have been using it for long time daily. Like 9 months orso.
Damn broAnd you are still that stupid?
THEY DONT BURN FACIAL FAT YOU FUCKING IDIOT
KYS
You thought those two things burned fat. That level of idiocy is stunning.Damn bro
Your autism is strong today
Should i call your helper
Yes i did think they burned fat. I've heard of both these products that they helped in burning face fat. I wanted to make sure of this.You thought those two things burned fat. That level of idiocy is stunning.
My autism? Perhaps look up the definition of the word before using it as you really are clueless
Not 100%. Because I am getting older, obviously.are u sure it’s the product and not just natural ageing or something?
this is insanely high IQ. make this into its own post it’s really valuable informationNot 100%. Because I am getting older, obviously.
I did find that in 1990's orso there was a patent (now expried patent) for fatloss-product-use on "retinA". So there may be some correlation. Why else the patent.
***
Source:
Patent for retinoids fro fat loss.
US5051449A - Treatment of cellulite with retinoids - Google Patents
A method for retarding and reversing cellulite comprises topically applying to human skin a retinoid in an amount and for a period of time effective to retard or reverse cellulite where said amount is insufficient to be excessively irritating. The method preferably uses retinoic acid in an...patents.google.com
Quotes from that patent description:
" A firmer, thicker and healthier dermis achieved by applying retinoids in accordance with the present invention inhibits the mobility of easily compressible fat locules, limiting their projection from the subcutaneous fat layer into the overlying dermis."
"Moreover, a moderate inflammatory reaction in the fibrous septaedividing the fat compartments of the subcutaneous tissue was eliminated on the retinoic acid side. Fibrosis (scarring) was also reduced. "
"Moreover, ultrasound indicated that fat locules did not project as deeply into the dermis, indicating that these projections were contained by the firmer connective tissue. "
**************
So I try to draw some conclusions.
Does tretinoin cause actually fat loss?
I did find that some fat loss creams do use retinoids (which tretinoin is 1 type of).
There exists a pattent (used for celulite mainly), for that use for retinoids.
Basically what I read there:, I think.
It seems, it'n not that the fat goes away or becomes less or anything.
But, it (fat) becomes more compact and less visible (and thus less volume).
The layers above the fat (skin layers from outside to inside: uperdermis, dermis, fat), so theuperdermis, dermis. Those 2 layers become more compact and "stronger", so the fat cells underneat thos 2 layers, can't push/move them (since they are sofy not so hard/strong) upwards so much and give the pressence of volume. Hence the appearance of loss of volume (even though correct term is maybe: "more compact/compressed).
Also, But I'm not sure if i read this correctly. The fat cels outher layer becomes "stronger" making the fat sells also more compact.
I'm not 100% sure if I read that correctly. But that's how it sounded to me.
madthis is insanely high IQ. make this into its own post it’s really valuable information
So what I’m getting from this is that the fat module get tighten up (but not lost) and that tighten effects gives the illusion of fat loss?Not 100%. Because I am getting older, obviously.
I did find that in 1990's orso there was a patent (now expried patent) for fatloss-product-use on "retinA". So there may be some correlation. Why else the patent.
***
Source:
Patent for retinoids fro fat loss.
US5051449A - Treatment of cellulite with retinoids - Google Patents
A method for retarding and reversing cellulite comprises topically applying to human skin a retinoid in an amount and for a period of time effective to retard or reverse cellulite where said amount is insufficient to be excessively irritating. The method preferably uses retinoic acid in an...patents.google.com
Quotes from that patent description:
" A firmer, thicker and healthier dermis achieved by applying retinoids in accordance with the present invention inhibits the mobility of easily compressible fat locules, limiting their projection from the subcutaneous fat layer into the overlying dermis."
"Moreover, a moderate inflammatory reaction in the fibrous septaedividing the fat compartments of the subcutaneous tissue was eliminated on the retinoic acid side. Fibrosis (scarring) was also reduced. "
"Moreover, ultrasound indicated that fat locules did not project as deeply into the dermis, indicating that these projections were contained by the firmer connective tissue. "
**************
So I try to draw some conclusions.
Does tretinoin cause actually fat loss?
I did find that some fat loss creams do use retinoids (which tretinoin is 1 type of).
There exists a pattent (used for celulite mainly), for that use for retinoids.
Basically what I read there:, I think.
It seems, it'n not that the fat goes away or becomes less or anything.
But, it (fat) becomes more compact and less visible (and thus less volume).
The layers above the fat (skin layers from outside to inside: uperdermis, dermis, fat), so theuperdermis, dermis. Those 2 layers become more compact and "stronger", so the fat cells underneat thos 2 layers, can't push/move them (since they are sofy not so hard/strong) upwards so much and give the pressence of volume. Hence the appearance of loss of volume (even though correct term is maybe: "more compact/compressed).
Also, But I'm not sure if i read this correctly. The fat cels outher layer becomes "stronger" making the fat sells also more compact.
I'm not 100% sure if I read that correctly. But that's how it sounded to me.
That's how I read it. But it's techincal as hell to read that patent thing, so I may misinterpret it.So what I’m getting from this is that the fat module get tighten up (but not lost) and that tighten effects gives the illusion of fat loss?
In essense. it should mean then also. that it's reverseable. By stopping tretioin. I'have stopped recently. I will see if I see changes or not. That wiould be great added information. althougyh only sample size of 1 person.this is insanely high IQ. make this into its own post it’s really valuable information
i have read that it can ‘leak’ inches across your skin to other areas. so that even if you are not using it around your eyes it may still reach thereThat's how I read it. But it's techincal as hell to read that patent thing, so I may misinterpret it.
PLus on top of that, the "thicker" or "stronger" skin layers makeing it less easy for the fat to push.
THIS. would also MEAN. That it's reverseable. When you stop Tretinoin/retinA. And it all gets a bit less tightened again.
I would imagine.
WELL, I'have stopped using it under eyes. SO I guess I am myself in this way a test case. I'll see what happens
I don't really go outside but i'm def not fat i'm underweightJfl you fst fuck
Stop eating shit and start drinking more water, less salt and giga cardio
OK, so what you have is facial bloat. All you need to do is what I told you.I don't really go outside but i'm def not fat i'm underweight
Damn. Guess i gotta runmaxxOK, so what you have is facial bloat. All you need to do is what I told you.
Retin a doesn't disove fat most likely either
Also idk what diuretics is
Yeah. True that.i have read that it can ‘leak’ inches across your skin to other areas. so that even if you are not using it around your eyes it may still reach there
To add.this is insanely high IQ. make this into its own post it’s really valuable information
very interesting. it gives me a little bit of peace of mind since i’m just trying to power through the worsened under eye area until the skin is thick enough to compensate for the thinner skin and less apparent eye fat. i can just quit it if it doesn’t improveTo add.
I been off retin-A fro some time around the eyes. Because I thought it caused fatloss there.
My hypotisis seemed right. that it's reverseable.
I checked today. And I'm now off retinA for like 1 month plus. And my volume inder eyes has come back.
So that may support my hypothosis that the fat is not lost, but structure and compactness changes caused it.
Sadly me stopping the Retin-A, the small wrinkles around eyes increased. AND the THICKER-ish skin I got from retinA under eyes is gone.
I need to read UP, on how I could mittiage volume loss. Then I would had found the wholy grain. Aplying something for daytime that dds volume, and RetinA for night. That may beat my dark circles the best.
I need to figure out. What is proven Volume maxxers creams.
First quick searches. I am going to look into topically application of DMAE and Hylaronic Acid.very interesting. it gives me a little bit of peace of mind since i’m just trying to power through the worsened under eye area until the skin is thick enough to compensate for the thinner skin and less apparent eye fat. i can just quit it if it doesn’t improve
i don’t think you will find much on how to mitigate volume loss tbh. but if you do please let me know.
Dmae seems cope to me nglFirst quick searches. I am going to look into topically application of DMAE and Hylaronic Acid.
I need to read search about its affect on volume or plumping the skin. Scientific evidence speaking.
I eat pretty consistently. I don't diet. Muh wait and fat percentage is also pretty consistent.Dmae seems cope to me ngl
applying vitamin C in the morning and Niacinamide (b3) at night is big in skincare
it could be your diet, how is your diet?
Its proven to burn fat pads but make ur skin collagen thickerretin a doesn’t burn fat it’s a low iq meme on this forum
it just thins ur skin temporarily before it thickens it so it can give the appearance that you lost fat
"Burn"?.Its proven to burn fat pads but make ur skin collagen thicker
It tighten the face which in results tighten the muscles and skin which results In leaner faceIts proven to burn fat pads but make ur skin collagen thicker
Did you get some more volume back in the eye area OP?To add.
I been off retin-A fro some time around the eyes. Because I thought it caused fatloss there.
My hypotisis seemed right. that it's reverseable.
I checked today. And I'm now off retinA for like 1 month plus. And my volume inder eyes has come back.
So that may support my hypothosis that the fat is not lost, but structure and compactness changes caused it.
Sadly me stopping the Retin-A, the small wrinkles around eyes increased. AND the THICKER-ish skin I got from retinA under eyes is gone.
I need to read UP, on how I could mittiage volume loss. Then I would had found the wholy grain. Aplying something for daytime that dds volume, and RetinA for night. That may beat my dark circles the best.
I need to figure out. What is proven Volume maxxers creams.
Where do you even get the idea from that a diuretic burns fat? Have you ever googled before what a diuretic actually does?Which works best? Or can i take both? Serious question
Yes, report is in. I stopped for some time with tretinoin under eyes. And I gotta back to old volume under eyes again.Did you get some more volume back in the eye area OP?
I'm in the same boat
Thanks for the reply man.Yes, report is in. I stopped for some time with tretinoin under eyes. And I gotta back to old volume under eyes again.
I had weak under eye volume always, but it returned back to what it was before. Because on tretinoin it for even worse.
I'm currently experimenting with:
Using tretinoin again under eyes ( for thicker skin Aman good against wrinkles).
And a moisturizer that plumose the skin. Aka trying to create volume through skin plumping.
I still need to investigate which products are best at plumping skin. I use ATM an overpriced DMAE + Hylaronic Acid moisturizer there under eyes. They said I think both ingredients have plumping qualities.
Have self "injected" some, with hyalron pen. I hate the risk of blidness, and it's not easy to get good releults at all. It halped me some for sure.why not consider having Hyaluronic Acid injected there instead/as well?
i hink that happened for me also. Luckily revesed back to old, which still wasn't good but at least a bit better/less darkness due to hollowness.That's what I'm considering ATM for my poor under-eye support (amplified by Tretinoin use I believe).
Yeah. I need tretinoin also for wrinkles managementBut Tretinoin was good at mitigating the appearance of my under-eye wrinkle... You can't have your cake and eat it too it seems.
so did it reverse?Have self "injected" some, with hyalron pen. I hate the risk of blidness, and it's not easy to get good releults at all. It halped me some for sure.
i hink that happened for me also. Luckily revesed back to old, which still wasn't good but at least a bit better/less darkness due to hollowness.
Yeah. I need tretinoin also for wrinkles management
Yesso did it reverse?