"rmy religion mogs", "science mogs", "muh muh morality brooo"

[alurmo]

meanwhile its all just dogmatic beliefs

if u care about these surface topics, such as the logicians who wear the pride of their logic on themselves like @topology ive interacted with in the past, looking into the mind of a logician, he mustve been lacking in other aspects to put emphasis on his superiority in the logic faculty?
i see it in a way of saying "i may not be____, but im right" which is a reactive art in deleuzean terms

but again if u care about these surface topics, it pains me to inform you to persue knowledge agressively, look into whats behind these dogma, recreate these dogma, and you will realise truly how futile and ignorant these beliefs are naturally

 

[topology]

but again if u care about these surface topics, it pains me to inform you to persue knowledge agressively, look into whats behind these dogma, recreate these dogma, and you will realise truly how futile and ignorant these beliefs are naturally

When will you people learn that everything truly is surface level? The need for you to explore the opposite only shows how fragile your ego is. You don't see the beauty in simplicity. Everything is simple. You have put 0 thought behind who you really are.

 

[alurmo]

When will you people learn that everything truly is surface level? The need for you to explore the opposite only shows how fragile your ego is. You don't see the beauty in simplicity. Everything is simple. You have put 0 thought behind who you really are.

ur right that everything is surface level but my persuit is looking at below the surface, even the 'ego' supersition is a dogma, i cultivate myself towards knowledge, perspectives and power

but even if u still ask whats the point of going below the surface, it helps u understand how to cultivate the surface, unless u fall into its traps that come with going below

 

[Tenres]

Nnothing wrong with dogmatic beliefs, if they are reasonable. Religion largely isn't, not organized religion. Science is.

 

[topology]

but even if u still ask whats the point of going below the surface, it helps u understand how to cultivate the surface, unless u fall into its traps that come with going below

Can you give an example of how this could be useful for the average person? As in what they could apply in their life to get an improvement?

Most people are also not able to accept anything past the surface. This is due to the average person being moronic and being a slave to everything taught. This site demonstrates it. When I say Natalie Portman peaked at 13 people immediately say "Muh pedophile!!!" Isn't this site supposed to be less like that? Even the "radical" spaces lack the critical thinking to get past that bottleneck. They just attach to other ideologies and are a different side of the same coin.

 

[alurmo]

Nnothing wrong with dogmatic beliefs, if they are reasonable. Religion largely isn't, not organized religion. Science is.

its dogma...
with the sciences promotes a certain belief, cultivated by newton, when the thoeries of roger boscovich are much more natural and even interlinked with philosophy
bc i dont know much abt the sciences i will just say the ideal science is the one thats interlinked with philosophy or nature in some way