SARPE + BAMP results

spark

spark

Banned
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Posts
7,713
Reputation
9,156
1614300826950
1614300816702

1614300853565


1614300887222

1614300910837


Looks very promising. And it looks like it was done via tads if I am not mistaken. Also @Sergio-OMS , how much force do you load the bollards with? In this interview they say more than 200 grams is not recommended
1614301015926

are you aware of any better anchorage systems which allow higher loading?



Sources:
1. 2.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8758 and sandcelmuttcel
what's BAMP
 
how much maxillary advancement was achieved
 
Balanced her smile but....
 
She even developed improved eye hooding due to her sinus’s increasing,
BB378D99 BBB2 4A37 B57E 28F49CC774CC

MSE=Hooded Eyes
F8C094C4 0C62 45A7 94C6 A1795BC878CF
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: randomvanish and Deleted member 8758
and that is despite it was a sarpe case which doesn't even expand the upper part afaik which means it was the protraction which did it
I think lack of forward growth can be a limiting factor foor even horizontal expansion. Most people need forward forces more than they need horizontal forces imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: spark
I think lack of forward growth can be a limiting factor foor even horizontal expansion. Most people need forward forces more than they need horizontal forces imo.
Indeed. That is why most MSE cases are somewhat underwhelming. Forward growth is way more important for aesthetics than lateral expansion.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4790 and Deleted member 8758
He even uses MARPE while protracting not just SARPE
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top