Orbix
Join date : 01/01/2027
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 1,452
- Reputation
- 2,291
EME angle: 57.5 degrees (ideal: 47-50)
comment: I'm glad its higher than ideal than lower because most people sub 47 degrees look like cucks, unless they have great wide set eyes that disguise the brutal eme angle
----------------------------------------------------------
ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.46 (ideal: 0.45-0.47)
----------------------------------------------------------
bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.2 (ideal: 1.35)
----------------------------------------------------------
chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0 (ideal: 2.0-2.25)
----------------------------------------------------------
mouth to nose ratio: 1.56 (ideal: 1.5-1.62)
----------------------------------------------------------
midface ratio: 1.08 (ideal: 1.0-1.1)
----------------------------------------------------------
lower/full face ratio: 0.62 (ideal: 0.62+)
----------------------------------------------------------
facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 2.07 (ideal: 1.8+)
----------------------------------------------------------
Results:
ideal: 6
close to ideal: 2
these results alone do not conclude my attractiveness due to a lack of baseline and other subjects, but nonetheless I'm pleasantly surprised that i conform to 6/8 of the ideal ratios that i tested on myself
comment: I'm glad its higher than ideal than lower because most people sub 47 degrees look like cucks, unless they have great wide set eyes that disguise the brutal eme angle
----------------------------------------------------------
ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.46 (ideal: 0.45-0.47)
----------------------------------------------------------
bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.2 (ideal: 1.35)
----------------------------------------------------------
chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0 (ideal: 2.0-2.25)
----------------------------------------------------------
mouth to nose ratio: 1.56 (ideal: 1.5-1.62)
----------------------------------------------------------
midface ratio: 1.08 (ideal: 1.0-1.1)
----------------------------------------------------------
lower/full face ratio: 0.62 (ideal: 0.62+)
----------------------------------------------------------
facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 2.07 (ideal: 1.8+)
----------------------------------------------------------
Results:
ideal: 6
close to ideal: 2
these results alone do not conclude my attractiveness due to a lack of baseline and other subjects, but nonetheless I'm pleasantly surprised that i conform to 6/8 of the ideal ratios that i tested on myself
