Limas profile is bad sry
all american top 3 type shii
It's not bad you're just a measurecel. She has a recessed chin and that's it she still looks stacy and yes better than ambrosio easily. I also told you (or someone else i cant remember) that there's tons of other features you can't detect or articulate which is why putting things on a piece of paper doesn't work. That's how you got guys here thinking they have a better side profile than jordan barrett
Lima mogs there yeah, again you're just focusing on chin recession and gonial angle when there's so many other things most of which you arent even aware of consciously. Your intuitition should tell this is el atrocidad holandesa
Nah
she certainly isnt you just rate side profile improperly. again focusing on whats identifiable and describable, such as undereye support missing possibly thousands of other features. this guy has a great side profile on paper but in reality its normie
margot isnt looking down. i also posted a pic very similar to that with her mouth open to which you can compare. the degraaf picture isnt cherrypicked lol, she has a terrible nose mouth and peanut bones
you can't even explain your reasoning bro
in that pic of lima (the one with the mouth open) she's looking slightly towards the camera, whereas in margot's case she's looking away from it. The orientation of the head in that axis is much more important than the tilt, because it actually alters the way the forward growth is perceived, whereas looking down can really only make the submental region worse.
Ik what you're talking abt: Bone mass, leanness, how the lighting bounces off the zygos, etc.
i have explained it though. looks isnt what you can measure and put in a shitty formula. thats the reasoning. go on jewtube and watch a lima and alessandra interview and read the comments where the normies identify the mog (most of them women too). i mean if you think lauren de graafs side profile isnt complete shit then i cant help you
the pic you posted shes looking down and margot isnt
nope. cover his eyes and it still looks normie. his bones arent chad, thats his main problem. jon kortajarena looks better despite recession
yeah, no shit. Only ambrosio's side is better, overall she gets fogged.
Disagree. If the blonde guy had better eyes and coloring, he would look comparable to kortajarena in profile.
the spirit of St.TikTokCel possessed me, sry@DelonLover1999 Lana is the goat why u jjfling
The interview im talking about has then mostly turned away from the cam
Yes. The way you rate side profile (which shouldnt even be "rated" as its just another angle but its convenient for demonstration purposes) is just by outlines of the face, like this
Coloring doesnt matter in comparison to facial structure
No. Again, idk where tf you got that from, but I 'rate' side just by looking at the pics. The inner face is also important obv.
Blonde guy looks just as good, even moreso when you consider Kortajarena is looking up into the sky lmfao, and blocking his whole upper third makes it harder for the brain to intuitively adjust to that tilt.
based af
easily within the top 10 artists of the decade imo
Alr then
Idk. Her front (and most other angles) are better so it would make sense though
Touche
Idk if that pic is supposed to prove that korta looks worse or not ngl. Regardless the blonde guy doesnt look good. I mean he looks "good" but he doesnt look handsome. Why? No clue
He looks good in a 'pure' sense, I think. Sensible, non-threatening, pleasant to look at, but lacking edge. Especially from the perspective of a man, he doesn't seem particularly threatening.
Yep
As soon as i saw him he reminded me of hugh laughton scott. I imagine he could match his lookslevel with those alterations
what title reads
ill probably say "mirin
and violate if I don't
she is not stacy but has insane appeal
to each his own, my nigga....
your seriously saying you don't find her attractive? jfl
she looks like a fish + retarded af haircolor
@BrahminBoss keep coping they are muy perfecto
