Sexual promiscuity is a social class issue

[Seth Walsh]

Sexual promiscuity being considered a social class issue is multifaceted, stemming from cultural, economic, and educational factors that intertwine with social stratification. Here's a breakdown of why:

1. Economic Factors: Economic stability can influence relationship choices and sexual behavior. Individuals from higher socio-economic backgrounds may have more access to education on sexual health and contraceptives, leading to different sexual behaviors compared to those from lower socio-economic backgrounds who might have less access to such resources.
2. Cultural Norms and Values: Cultural expectations can vary significantly across different social classes, influencing attitudes towards relationships and sex. In some cultures, there might be a higher value placed on marital fidelity and long-term relationships among certain classes, while in others, there might be a more liberal or relaxed attitude towards casual sex.
3. Education Levels: Education plays a crucial role in shaping individuals' perspectives on various aspects of life, including sex. People with higher education levels often have more exposure to diverse viewpoints and critical thinking skills, which can influence their sexual behavior and attitudes towards promiscuity.
4. Social Opportunities and Networks: Social circles and opportunities often differ by class, affecting how individuals meet potential partners and what types of relationships are deemed acceptable. Higher social classes might engage in networking events or social settings that encourage stable, long-term connections, whereas different opportunities might exist for other classes.
5. Media Influence and Representation: Media often portrays sexual behavior and standards differently across social classes, which can affect societal expectations and personal aspirations. This portrayal can reinforce stereotypes and influence individual behavior to align with perceived class norms.
6. Access to Resources: Access to sexual education, health care, and contraceptive methods can vary by social class, influencing sexual behavior. Those with more resources are often better equipped to make informed decisions about their sexual health, potentially leading to differences in promiscuity levels.

The interplay of these factors suggests that perceptions of and engagement in sexual promiscuity can indeed be influenced by one's social class, though it's important to recognize that individual choices and behaviors vary widely within any class.

 

[heightmaxxing]

Lower class are almost always way more sexually active. I know a alot of people from council estate some of them having 10+ body counts at 16.Both men and women it's actually disgusting.

 

[Seth Walsh]

Lower class are almost always way more sexually active. I know a alot of people from council estate some of them having 10+ body counts at 16.Both men and women it's actually disgusting.

Yep always.

"Slaying/clubbing" is a low social class activity. There's a reason why upper class Chads don't bang 100s of chicks even when they can. It goes to show how much money and wealth matters. It changes your entire life.

People are stuck in their social classes. Women want to marry up (in terms of social class). It's still a thing, the main thing. Hypergamy for looks is such a retarded concept. It's social class hypergamy.

Social class and money will continue to matter more and more into the future. Looks will matter less. Looks matter of course, but it'll become the new redpill scam. Making broke unemployed men in their early 20s buy skincare, gym supplements, jawline trainers etc. Self improvement scams will become so much more cutthroat. But no one will reveal that creating and sustaining a family with a harmonious marriage requires a lot of money, and well paying career, support, and a social class threshold, not a looks threshold. Your class is also baked into your phrenology. So that's real lookism. It's the truth.

 

[Roge]

1) wtf is this ai shit
2) what do you recommend then
3) proofs of chad not banging hundreds?

 

[BrahminBoss]

Yep always.

"Slaying/clubbing" is a low social class activity. There's a reason why upper class Chads don't bang 100s of chicks even when they can. It goes to show how much money and wealth matters. It changes your entire life.

People are stuck in their social classes. Women want to marry up (in terms of social class). It's still a thing, the main thing. Hypergamy for looks is such a retarded concept. It's social class hypergamy.

Social class and money will continue to matter more and more into the future. Looks will matter less. Looks matter of course, but it'll become the new redpill scam. Making broke unemployed men in their early 20s buy skincare, gym supplements, jawline trainers etc. Self improvement scams will become so much more cutthroat. But no one will reveal that creating and sustaining a family with a harmonious marriage requires a lot of money, and well paying career, support, and a social class threshold, not a looks threshold. Your class is also baked into your phrenology. So that's real lookism. It's the truth.

your looks = your pedigree

 

[InnerVoid]

sex seems to be easier if low class but you still need looks for it anyway. most sexually active girl i met was my oneitis and she was from a poor family

 

[Seth Walsh]

1) wtf is this ai shit
2) what do you recommend then
3) proofs of chad not banging hundreds?

Just looksmax. And Chads can bang whoever they want. They don't because there's a correlation between higher social class and heightened long term thinking/planning (i.e., not ruining your future life). It applies for men and women. The constraint is just intelligence and class.

There is a reason why high class Chads aren't trying to slay as many chicks as they can from Tinder.

 

[Miniskull]

dnr

 

[Seth Walsh]

dnr

cope

 

[Roge]

Just looksmax. And Chads can bang whoever they want. They don't because there's a correlation between higher social class and heightened long term thinking/planning (i.e., not ruining your future life). It applies for men and women. The constraint is just intelligence and class.

There is a reason why high class Chads aren't trying to slay as many chicks as they can from Tinder.

I'm looking for proof that chads aren't banging hundreds. Reminder that every celeb chad had tens of stories with escorts at least, look for example at Cristiano

And how slaying can ruin future for MAN?

 

[Xtra]

Sexual promiscuity being considered a social class issue is multifaceted, stemming from cultural, economic, and educational factors that intertwine with social stratification. Here's a breakdown of why:

1. Economic Factors: Economic stability can influence relationship choices and sexual behavior. Individuals from higher socio-economic backgrounds may have more access to education on sexual health and contraceptives, leading to different sexual behaviors compared to those from lower socio-economic backgrounds who might have less access to such resources.
2. Cultural Norms and Values: Cultural expectations can vary significantly across different social classes, influencing attitudes towards relationships and sex. In some cultures, there might be a higher value placed on marital fidelity and long-term relationships among certain classes, while in others, there might be a more liberal or relaxed attitude towards casual sex.
3. Education Levels: Education plays a crucial role in shaping individuals' perspectives on various aspects of life, including sex. People with higher education levels often have more exposure to diverse viewpoints and critical thinking skills, which can influence their sexual behavior and attitudes towards promiscuity.
4. Social Opportunities and Networks: Social circles and opportunities often differ by class, affecting how individuals meet potential partners and what types of relationships are deemed acceptable. Higher social classes might engage in networking events or social settings that encourage stable, long-term connections, whereas different opportunities might exist for other classes.
5. Media Influence and Representation: Media often portrays sexual behavior and standards differently across social classes, which can affect societal expectations and personal aspirations. This portrayal can reinforce stereotypes and influence individual behavior to align with perceived class norms.
6. Access to Resources: Access to sexual education, health care, and contraceptive methods can vary by social class, influencing sexual behavior. Those with more resources are often better equipped to make informed decisions about their sexual health, potentially leading to differences in promiscuity levels.

The interplay of these factors suggests that perceptions of and engagement in sexual promiscuity can indeed be influenced by one's social class, though it's important to recognize that individual choices and behaviors vary widely within any class.

Lower class are almost always way more sexually active. I know a alot of people from council estate some of them having 10+ body counts at 16.Both men and women it's actually disgusting.

entire thread is true, an ugly low class idiot will have a higher body count than a rich private school chad because lower class people are gonna be fucking way more, i grew up in a low class area and there was many idiots in my school fucking from as early as 11-12. i highly doubt middle class kids do the same thing

 

[Seth Walsh]

I'm looking for proof that chads aren't banging hundreds. Reminder that every celeb chad had tens of stories with escorts at least, look for example at Cristiano

And how slaying can ruin future for MAN?

CR7 is one of the most famous people on earth. I'm talking about good looking guys from council estates versus a good looking Harvard grad. The latter will always seek stability and family despite all the options. The former will "slay" and live the bachelor/single life into his 40s and onward simply because he can't afford to provide for a wife and kids. That's just the truth. What's the solution? I don't know.

But this is an example where there's NO LOOKS for your social class.

Slaying as a man can ruin his future because of the wasted time, forgone opportunity to build wealth, find a good LTR, break out of impoverished circumstances etc. Because at the end of all the slaying, you haven't got anything. And I believe change is what matters the most in life, and it's certainly possible to go from nothing and greatly improve your situation. But slaying trashy chicks for years ends up being a waste of time. It's not even possible to be a "slayer" and work any type of normal job, so this assumes the guy is unemployed and collecting welfare in the first place.

This is just a new perspective, contrary to our gang of Indians who constantly reinforce that "looks are the only thing that matter, nothing else matters".

This is far more blackpilling. "Only looks matter" guys are copers. Obviously we know the facial analysis guys are coping, but so are those who say that any MTN with lots of money and stability is just getting betabuxxed. It's not true. Money and stability is the foundation of successful LTRs and marriages, families etc.

If people don't want to accept this as truth then fine. But things will be 1000000000000x more brutal when you are 45 with no kids thinking it's "all looks".



I also craft my posts for shock value and to maximise replies. But I generally believe this. Also read my sig.

 

[MoggerGaston]

Knowing a lot of higher class women attending universities, I know serial monogamy with hookups in between is the standard. These women still rack up tens of slays this way.

 

[Roge]

CR7 is one of the most famous people on earth. I'm talking about good looking guys from council estates versus a good looking Harvard grad. The latter will always seek stability and family despite all the options. The former will "slay" and live the bachelor/single life into his 40s and onward simply because he can't afford to provide for a wife and kids. That's just the truth. What's the solution? I don't know.

But this is an example where there's NO LOOKS for your social class.

Slaying as a man can ruin his future because of the wasted time, forgone opportunity to build wealth, find a good LTR, break out of impoverished circumstances etc. Because at the end of all the slaying, you haven't got anything. And I believe change is what matters the most in life, and it's certainly possible to go from nothing and greatly improve your situation. But slaying trashy chicks for years ends up being a waste of time. It's not even possible to be a "slayer" and work any type of normal job, so this assumes the guy is unemployed and collecting welfare in the first place.

This is just a new perspective, contrary to our gang of Indians who constantly reinforce that "looks are the only thing that matter, nothing else matters".

This is far more blackpilling. "Only looks matter" guys are copers. Obviously we know the facial analysis guys are coping, but so are those who say that any MTN with lots of money and stability is just getting betabuxxed. It's not true. Money and stability is the foundation of successful LTRs and marriages, families etc.

If people don't want to accept this as truth then fine. But things will be 1000000000000x more brutal when you are 45 with no kids thinking it's "all looks".



I also craft my posts for shock value and to maximise replies. But I generally believe this. Also read my sig.

Whats wrong with living rich bachelor lifestyle? Slaying is not only going to clubs or tinder, its more about not having LTRs and changing sexual partners. You still can seduce high class women and then dump them. And it can happen like every weekend, not daily so you still have time for your business.

 

[Seth Walsh]

Whats wrong with living rich bachelor lifestyle? Slaying is not only going to clubs or tinder, its more about not having LTRs and changing sexual partners. You still can seduce high class women and then dump them. And it can happen like every weekend, not daily so you still have time for your business.

Nothing's wrong with it, and it's done; especially by people with celeb status. It's just something that Chads in high social classes value less. I've seen more very good looking and successful men willingly choose to settle down and marry, than live a bachelor life; even though the latter seems more appealing to onlookers.

High status (non celeb) Chads generally are more monogamous and settle down. I think it's probably to do with private property. Knowing you can provide your kids a good life (possibly better than your own), and eventually passing everything on to them as you pass away, and dying in company.

There's obviously a link between intelligence and long term thinking. I think living a bachelor life into your 40s as a (non celeb) Chad is brutal. No one wants to be alone in old age. Your family dies and you gave up the opportunity to have your own because you could "slay".

Slaying in highschool, college and mid twenties, then LTRing for marriage is way more uncompromising.

The point I'm trying to illustrate is:

1. Rich Chads have OPTIONS. Not just options in terms of no. of women, but options in terms of how well they can plan out a future for their kids, how well they can compartmentalize different decades of their lives.
2. "Slaying" into your mid 30s, 40s and beyond is, in my opinion, a cope. It's shows an insufficiency of resources, mental issues, esteem issues, financial insecurity, and inability to find a good enough wife, which is the most important thing. Staying a bachelor is something truly regretful in my opinion. Unless you're truly steadfast and make it work.


People will always give George Clooney as an example. But honestly, how many guys are gonna be, good looking, calm, tanned, charming, ultra high status, famous, centimillionaires in their 60s?


I'm just trying to argue for marriage, and why it can work for some people, and why good looking people still look for stability and family despite the opportunity to have unlimited flings. You don't need 4 decades for slaying. That's like 15,000 days, and a lot of wasted time.

 

[russwestbrook]

rich late teens/early 20s people in uk (the ones who went to the best private schools) do fuck around a lot, been in those circles a lot and know first hand. (assuming they are GL) both girls and boys

 

[Roge]

Nothing's wrong with it, and it's done; especially by people with celeb status. It's just something that Chads in high social classes value less. I've seen more very good looking and successful men willingly choose to settle down and marry, than live a bachelor life; even though the latter seems more appealing to onlookers.

High status (non celeb) Chads generally are more monogamous and settle down. I think it's probably to do with private property. Knowing you can provide your kids a good life (possibly better than your own), and eventually passing everything on to them as you pass away, and dying in company.

There's obviously a link between intelligence and long term thinking. I think living a bachelor life into your 40s as a (non celeb) Chad is brutal. No one wants to be alone in old age. Your family dies and you gave up the opportunity to have your own because you could "slay".

Slaying in highschool, college and mid twenties, then LTRing for marriage is way more uncompromising.

The point I'm trying to illustrate is:

1. Rich Chads have OPTIONS. Not just options in terms of no. of women, but options in terms of how well they can plan out a future for their kids, how well they can compartmentalize different decades of their lives.
2. "Slaying" into your mid 30s, 40s and beyond is, in my opinion, a cope. It's shows an insufficiency of resources, mental issues, esteem issues, financial insecurity, and inability to find a good enough wife, which is the most important thing. Staying a bachelor is something truly regretful in my opinion. Unless you're truly steadfast and make it work.


People will always give George Clooney as an example. But honestly, how many guys are gonna be, good looking, calm, tanned, charming, ultra high status, famous, centimillionaires in their 60s?


I'm just trying to argue for marriage, and why it can work for some people, and why good looking people still look for stability and family despite the opportunity to have unlimited flings. You don't need 4 decades for slaying. That's like 15,000 days, and a lot of wasted time.

What about inability to find good wife and people who dont want kids? Lets say you get some surgeries, your kids would be subhuman, no? And how many chances are there to find hqnp + virgin + stacy (which equates to chad with money)?

 

[Seth Walsh]

What about inability to find good wife and people who dont want kids? Lets say you get some surgeries, your kids would be subhuman, no? And how many chances are there to find hqnp + virgin + stacy (which equates to chad with money)?

I don't fully understand what you're asking. If you truly don't want kids, fair enough. Surgery won't change your genes, low chance of a virgin stacy as always. Slightly higher chance if you're an LMSmaxxed high class Chad, but even then, you need JBF (just be first).

So if you want the maximum chance of getting a virgin Stacy you pretty much need to be a white Chad from a super wealthy family and be really good looking and hold her hand in grade school and kiss her playing bob-the-apple at age 11.

It sounds like you are Indian so none of this applies to you.

I hope I answered your questions though.

 

[Sny]

If you have a high body count. Chances are you are low class, pretty water. Funnily enough if you do have a high body count you are most likely messing with more unattractive people as the distribution of attractive people simply isn't enough to reach double digits during most people's lifetime.

 

[Roge]

Basically you advocate for families, kids and so on.
So...

I don't fully understand what you're asking. If you truly don't want kids, fair enough.

What about slaying for guys who dont want kids? Nothing to miss then?

Surgery won't change your genes, low chance of a virgin stacy as always.

What about slaying and not having families for guys who will have surgeries (their kids will be subhuman so this thought calms down their family creation plans)

Slightly higher chance if you're an LMSmaxxed high class Chad, but even then, you need JBF (just be first).
So if you want the maximum chance of getting a virgin Stacy you pretty much need to be a white Chad from a super wealthy family and be really good looking and hold her hand in grade school and kiss her playing bob-the-apple at age 11.

What about not creating family because of understanding female nature? "You can either love women or understand them." This means no life-long ltr, marriage is scam, gynocentric laws etc etc (ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR RICH GUYS).

It sounds like you are Indian so none of this applies to you.

BRUTAL
Is it my location or improper english? (You are wrong tho)

 

[Roge]

If you have a high body count. Chances are you are low class, pretty water. Funnily enough if you do have a high body count you are most likely messing with more unattractive people as the distribution of attractive people simply isn't enough to reach double digits during most people's lifetime.

You can have htb+ escort everyday for 10 days.
Just have to pay for the elite ones. And there is your double digit bodycount

 

[Seth Walsh]

If you have a high body count. Chances are you are low class, pretty water. Funnily enough if you do have a high body count you are most likely messing with more unattractive people as the distribution of attractive people simply isn't enough to reach double digits during most people's lifetime.

I guess it comes down to more intelligent people being more sanctimonious in a way, especially girls.

• More attractive girls see more value withholding sex as they've more self esteem (and self worth)
• It's been shown that poverty and sexual liberalism are highly correlated
• No white collar worker has time to slay or sees it as a priority
• More unplanned births happen in impoverished communities. Can be backward induced that lower social classes have more sex
• Slaying needs a lot of free time. Building wealth and slaying can't really go hand in hand... unless you're getting paid to get laid?

That being said, I'm not coping. Just trying to prove a point. It's obvious water at this stage. That's why you see rockstars slay like crazy. It comes down to free time at the end of the day. They're on tour and girls are everywhere. Most high class Chads are working office jobs and just don't have time to not be in LTRs. Looks, money and status still dictate it all; but status has always been tossed away or misconstrued. Social status is the S in LMS.

 

[thereallegend]

We must ban ChatGPT

 

[Seth Walsh]

Basically you advocate for families, kids and so on.
So...

What about slaying for guys who dont want kids? Nothing to miss then?

What about slaying and not having families for guys who will have surgeries (their kids will be subhuman so this thought calms down their family creation plans)

What about not creating family because of understanding female nature? "You can either love women or understand them." This means no life-long ltr, marriage is scam, gynocentric laws etc etc (ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR RICH GUYS).


BRUTAL
Is it my location or improper english? (You are wrong tho)

1. Yes.
2. If you don't want kids fine, but good luck setting up some choreography where you've unlimited interested chicks at your disposal. You'd probably just end up escortmaxxing and accepting fate.
3. I don't know how to answer this question about slaying, having families and having surgeries. I don't understand it, can you rephrase?
4. I don't think you actually understand female nature. And female nature changes depending on who you are. Like in real nature, it can either be beautiful or brutal (i.e., beautiful fjords, forests, waterfalls, landscapes; or brutal animal-on-animal killings). Female nature changes between sub5s and Chads. It's not a science nor is it static. And you can be in a harmonious relationship. The only people who deny that, are people who can't get a relationship.

Yeah it was your stylometry, it reads very Indian.

 

[Roge]

1. Yes.
2. If you don't want kids fine, but good luck setting up some choreography where you've unlimited interested chicks at your disposal. You'd probably just end up escortmaxxing and accepting fate.
3. I don't know how to answer this question about slaying, having families and having surgeries. I don't understand it, can you rephrase?
4. I don't think you actually understand female nature. And female nature changes depending on who you are. Like in real nature, it can either be beautiful or brutal (i.e., beautiful fjords, forests, waterfalls, landscapes; or brutal animal-on-animal killings). Female nature changes between sub5s and Chads. It's not a science nor is it static. And you can be in a harmonious relationship. The only people who deny that, are people who can't get a relationship.

Yeah it was your stylometry, it reads very Indian.

3. How to have kids when you had surgeries and ascended lets say from mtn to chadlite? Your kids will be not so good looking.
4. Tom Brady, Brad Pitt, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos ... . Even they cant have harmonious long relationships without getting skewed.

I think its ideal to spend a decade from like 18 to 28 to fully looksmax and establish career / business (no dating, clubbing etc) and then just live rich bachelor lifestyle for the rest of your life

 

[Seth Walsh]

3. How to have kids when you had surgeries and ascended lets say from mtn to chadlite? Your kids will be not so good looking.
4. Tom Brady, Brad Pitt, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos ... . Even they cant have harmonious long relationships without getting skewed.

I think its ideal to spend a decade from like 18 to 28 to fully looksmax and establish career / business (no dating, clubbing etc) and then just live rich bachelor lifestyle for the rest of your life

3. I know that, I already said before that surgery doesn't change your genes. Having surgery to have kids makes no sense (are you sure you're not in India right now?)
4. You just cherrypicked random famous people. Try looking at everyone who hasn't got divorced, and see what keeps their marriages together. Usually it's compatibility, compromise, focus on the kids, strong family, investing in the kids' education, among other things such as long lasting attraction. But money, income, stability really helps keep marriages glued, among other random shit like home renovations etc etc

I don't think it's ideal to spend 18-28 fully looksmaxing just to live a single "rich bachelor life". Maybe ideal in absolute terms, like in a fantastical sense. Who would want to spend their 40s onwards alone, and have no family when your parents, aunts and uncles all start dying?

 

[Roge]

3. I know that, I already said before that surgery doesn't change your genes. Having surgery to have kids makes no sense (are you sure you're not in India right now?)
4. You just cherrypicked random famous people. Try looking at everyone who hasn't got divorced, and see what keeps their marriages together. Usually it's compatibility, compromise, focus on the kids, strong family, investing in the kids' education, among other things such as long lasting attraction. But money, income, stability really helps keep marriages glued, among other random shit like home renovations etc etc

I don't think it's ideal to spend 18-28 fully looksmaxing just to live a single "rich bachelor life". Maybe ideal in absolute terms, like in a fantastical sense. Who would want to spend their 40s onwards alone, and have no family when your parents, aunts and uncles all start dying?

3. You are having surgeries to improve your chance of having kids with gl female. Without surgeries you dont appeal to females, with them you become gl but your kids are still fucked. Whats the point of kids then if they will be bad looking (reality for 99% of users here)?
4. Cherrypick me stable celeb marriages. Almost every celeb is remarried for 5th time

Whats wrong with being alone? Hobbies, money, meeting random people etc are still there

 

[Seth Walsh]

3. You are having surgeries to improve your chance of having kids with gl female. Without surgeries you dont appeal to females, with them you become gl but your kids are still fucked. Whats the point of kids then if they will be bad looking (reality for 99% of users here)?
4. Cherrypick me stable celeb marriages. Almost every celeb is remarried for 5th time

Whats wrong with being alone? Hobbies, money, meeting random people etc are still there

Are you in India right now? You have to be

Cmon own up


Dying alone is BRUTAL and living your whole life alone is insanely brutal. People are gonna live past 120 and everyone wants to have a family they can call their own. It's company. Family and kids makes life worth living as you get older, basically everyone says this.

Most rockstars overdose on drugs and cope with coke and heroin because they don't have stability and family, despite being on top of the world.

Stable celeb marriages are harder because of the exposure to hedonism. Many celebs end up alone and miserable, washed up, taking their own lives, addicted to drugs etc.

Here's 50 non-cherrypicked celeb marriages:

1. Beyoncé and Jay-Z
2. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
3. David Beckham and Victoria Beckham
4. Chrissy Teigen and John Legend
5. Emily Blunt and John Krasinski
6. Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel
7. George Clooney and Amal Clooney
8. Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi
9. Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth (note: status may change; check current sources)
10. Kim Kardashian and Kanye West (note: status may change; check current sources)
11. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
12. Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith
13. Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban
14. Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom
15. Serena Williams and Alexis Ohanian
16. Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas
17. Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas
18. Gisele Bündchen and Tom Brady
19. Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively (duplicate, reflects the significance in both being celebrities)
20. Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis
21. Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell
22. Hugh Jackman and Deborra-Lee Furness
23. Justin Bieber and Hailey Baldwin
24. Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky
25. Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones
26. Barack Obama and Michelle Obama (considered celebrities by many)
27. Matthew McConaughey and Camila Alves
28. Jennifer Lopez and Alex Rodriguez (note: status may change; check current sources)
29. Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham
30. Keith Richards and Patti Hansen
31. Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz
32. Meryl Streep and Don Gummer
33. Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick
34. Jimmy Fallon and Nancy Juvonen
35. Julia Roberts and Danny Moder
36. Ellen Pompeo and Chris Ivery
37. Anne Hathaway and Adam Shulman
38. Reese Witherspoon and Jim Toth
39. Viola Davis and Julius Tennon
40. Hugh Grant and Anna Eberstein
41. Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost
42. Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick
43. Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka
44. Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz
45. Seth Rogen and Lauren Miller
46. Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner (note: status may change; check current sources)
47. Lisa Bonet and Jason Momoa (note: status may change; check current sources)
48. Emily Ratajkowski and Sebastian Bear-McClard (note: status may change; check current sources)
49. Zoe Saldana and Marco Perego
50. Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo

 

[Roge]

Are you in India right now? You have to be

Cmon own up


Dying alone is BRUTAL and living your whole life alone is insanely brutal. People are gonna live past 120 and everyone wants to have a family they can call their own. It's company. Family and kids makes life worth living as you get older, basically everyone says this.

Most rockstars overdose on drugs and cope with coke and heroin because they don't have stability and family, despite being on top of the world.

Stable celeb marriages are harder because of the exposure to hedonism. Many celebs end up alone and miserable, washed up, taking their own lives, addicted to drugs etc.

Here's 50 non-cherrypicked celeb marriages:

1. Beyoncé and Jay-Z
2. Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
3. David Beckham and Victoria Beckham
4. Chrissy Teigen and John Legend
5. Emily Blunt and John Krasinski
6. Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel
7. George Clooney and Amal Clooney
8. Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi
9. Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth (note: status may change; check current sources)
10. Kim Kardashian and Kanye West (note: status may change; check current sources)
11. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
12. Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith
13. Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban
14. Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom
15. Serena Williams and Alexis Ohanian
16. Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas
17. Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas
18. Gisele Bündchen and Tom Brady
19. Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively (duplicate, reflects the significance in both being celebrities)
20. Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis
21. Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell
22. Hugh Jackman and Deborra-Lee Furness
23. Justin Bieber and Hailey Baldwin
24. Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky
25. Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones
26. Barack Obama and Michelle Obama (considered celebrities by many)
27. Matthew McConaughey and Camila Alves
28. Jennifer Lopez and Alex Rodriguez (note: status may change; check current sources)
29. Oprah Winfrey and Stedman Graham
30. Keith Richards and Patti Hansen
31. Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz
32. Meryl Streep and Don Gummer
33. Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick
34. Jimmy Fallon and Nancy Juvonen
35. Julia Roberts and Danny Moder
36. Ellen Pompeo and Chris Ivery
37. Anne Hathaway and Adam Shulman
38. Reese Witherspoon and Jim Toth
39. Viola Davis and Julius Tennon
40. Hugh Grant and Anna Eberstein
41. Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost
42. Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick
43. Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka
44. Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz
45. Seth Rogen and Lauren Miller
46. Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner (note: status may change; check current sources)
47. Lisa Bonet and Jason Momoa (note: status may change; check current sources)
48. Emily Ratajkowski and Sebastian Bear-McClard (note: status may change; check current sources)
49. Zoe Saldana and Marco Perego
50. Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo

No I'm still not in india. About 40 of your listed marriages either already divorced or its world known that they are not stable (jay z cheating, jada smith etc). Everyone I randomly googled is divorced. Mamoa is in process (wife wiled for divorce jan 2024). Ratajkowski is a slut who even become famous just because of it

I think you fear being alone too much, its the best actually

 

[Seth Walsh]

No I'm still not in india. About 40 of your listed marriages either already divorced or its world known that they are not stable (jay z cheating, jada smith etc)

There you go. Super celeb status marriages don't last, like I mentioned at the start of the thread. Being a celebrity isn't conducive to living a "normal" life. But you are not a world renowned celebrity anyway, which is why your "just looksmax and get rich and live a bachelor life" theory makes no sense. What makes that think it'll work out for you. Celebrities are cursed in the sense they can't settle down. BTW I only listed dual celebrity marriages, there's tons of celebrities who are married to normal people. But why are you so concerned with celebrities? You are not a celebrity.

 

[Roge]

There you go. Super celeb status marriages don't last, like I mentioned at the start of the thread. Being a celebrity isn't conducive to living a "normal" life. But you are not a world renowned celebrity anyway, which is why your "just looksmax and get rich and live a bachelor life" theory makes no sense. What makes that think it'll work out for you. Celebrities are cursed in the sense they can't settle down. BTW I only listed dual celebrity marriages, there's tons of celebrities who are married to normal people. But why are you so concerned with celebrities? You are not a celebrity.

Whats so bad with being alone?

 

[Seth Walsh]

I think you fear being alone too much, its the best actually

Say that when you're alone at 60. I don't fear it. I'm being rational with you and offering new perspectives. And you're talking about trying to ascend with surgeries which is a bonafide meme at this point.

The purpose of this thread is to highlight that looks shouldn't be the only focus. And slaying shouldn't be the end goal. Money and social status matter way more than you'd like to think. I'd say there'd only be a few dozen people who ever signed up for PSL sites who actually needed surgery, ever. Surgery is just a meme.

 

[Seth Walsh]

Whats so bad with being alone?

It's okay for a period of time, but not for eternity.

It will rip your soul apart and diminish you. Being alone for all of eternity. Being old and alone. Being old, alone with no family alive, no kids, and the opportunity to start a family long forgone, while still being alive, old and invisible. There's nothing more brutal.

So, what's so bad?

I guess everything is subjective.

But you have a wrong bias where you think you'll be able to emulate George Clooney's bachelor lifestyle. You ARE COMPARING YOURSELF TO CELEBRITIES.

 

[Roge]

It's okay for a period of time, but not for eternity.

It will rip your soul apart and diminish you. Being alone for all of eternity. Being old and alone. Being old, alone with no family alive, no kids, and the opportunity to start a family long forgone, while still being alive, old and invisible. There's nothing more brutal.

So, what's so bad?

I guess everything is subjective.

But you have a wrong bias where you think you'll be able to emulate George Clooney's bachelor lifestyle. You ARE COMPARING YOURSELF TO CELEBRITIES.

What about old men with money who have relationships? Even marry or suddenly change their mind and make kids

 

[Seth Walsh]

What about old men with money who have relationships? Even marry or suddenly change their mind and make kids

What?

 

[Roge]

What?

You can't be alone if gl and have money

 

[Seth Walsh]

You can't be alone if gl and have money

Are you good looking with lots of money?

 

[Roge]

Are you good looking with lots of money?

Thats what I'm striving for. At least I have good looks potential so everything is possible. Any other way of life is not worthy having anyway

 

[Seth Walsh]

Thats what I'm striving for. At least I have good looks potential so everything is possible. Any other way of life is not worthy having anyway

I guess you'll find out if you can be alone with good looks and money then

 

[copemaxxeer]

And how slaying can ruin future for MAN?

Unwanted pregnancy

 

[Roge]

Unwanted pregnancy

Obviously only with condoms or you have to force fed that foid with some tablet

 

[IntelligentCel]

The higher the body count, the higher the chance of cheating when in a committed relationship. That's why I say (and can prove it) that in the West, committed relationships don't exist and are committed only in naive and Blue-pilled men's heads.

 

[IntelligentCel]

All men in the West are already in open relationships. Now, if they know it or not, well... that's a different story.

 

[copemaxxeer]

Obviously only with condoms

I can't believe how people can trust a stupid glove to not ruin their future, I would never have sex with a girl I wouldn't be ok with having kids with, slaying is retared, a waste of time and a looksmin because alcohol and parties

 

[Roge]

I can't believe how people can trust a stupid glove to not ruin their future, I would never have sex with a girl I wouldn't be ok with having kids with, slaying is retared, a waste of time and a looksmin because alcohol and parties

No parties no alcohol and contraception methods are ok. Obviously you dont fuck some hiv foid

 

[solohunter99]

Yep always.

"Slaying/clubbing" is a low social class activity. There's a reason why upper class Chads don't bang 100s of chicks even when they can. It goes to show how much money and wealth matters. It changes your entire life.

This doesn’t seem quite right though. A lot of emperors, religious leaders, warlord conquerors, etc. in history had harems of dozens, even hundreds and thousands of women once they got in power. This is why we have more female than male ancestors, being strong = being polygamous in most of history. The rich today like celebrities, athletes, actors, musicians, stars, influencers, millionaire playboys, can’t engage in open polygamy like in the past but instead they engage in tons of promiscuity and serial monogamy. Lots of rock stars are recorded as sleeping with thousands of girls. Even CEOs and politicians which are monogamous for the public eye frequently have scandals where they’re caught with mistresses or escorts in back room deals. What’s your explanation for this OP?

 

[Seth Walsh]

This doesn’t seem quite right though. A lot of emperors, religious leaders, warlord conquerors, etc. in history had harems of dozens, even hundreds and thousands of women once they got in power. This is why we have more female than male ancestors, being strong = being polygamous in most of history. The rich today like celebrities, athletes, actors, musicians, stars, influencers, millionaire playboys, can’t engage in open polygamy like in the past but instead they engage in tons of promiscuity and serial monogamy. Lots of rock stars are recorded as sleeping with thousands of girls. Even CEOs and politicians which are monogamous for the public eye frequently have scandals where they’re caught with mistresses or escorts in back room deals. What’s your explanation for this OP?

Forget about ancient emprerors and famous people in the public eye. I'm talking about low v high social status people (who are not world famous).

 

[Seth Walsh]

Forget about ancient emprerors and famous people in the public eye. I'm talking about low v high social status people (who are not world famous).

And yeah I agree our natural state is polygamous. Monogamy is a result of private property lines.

 

[solohunter99]

Forget about ancient emprerors and famous people in the public eye. I'm talking about low v high social status people (who are not world famous).

Even still, the super rich who aren’t world famous are still known for sexual degeneracy, think about the list of random quiet rich guys on Epstein’s island for example and on a more normal level how CEOs and politicians frequently abuse their female subordinates for sex (IDK if this still happens as much after MeToo but until like 20 years ago this was common operating procedure). I agree with you about the phenomenon you’re describing but I don’t think actual upper class people behave like this, what you’re describing is solidly middle class people that *want* to be upper class but aren’t.

 

[try2beme]

Because its the only thing u can do as a poor nigga u not gonna go somewhere nice so just get pussy and even scam or rob the bitch