Should i take the risk of Radiesse instead of hyaluronic acid filler?

Deusmaximus

Deusmaximus

Fuchsia
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Posts
12,233
Reputation
26,538
My surgeon said Radiesse will provide a better result on cheekbones compared to hyaluronic acid. Less water attraction, more collagen boost, sharper lines and longer duration. Still the risk is that its not possible to dissolve if i dont like the result or a vascular/arterial occlusion happens. So the risk of blindness is a lot higher.

Should i still give it a try?
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 16371
My surgeon said Radiesse will provide a better result on cheekbones compared to hyaluronic acid. Less water attraction, more collagen boost, sharper lines and longer duration. Still the risk is that its not possible to dissolve if i dont like the result or a vascular/arterial occlusion happens. So the risk of blindness is a lot higher.

Should i still give it a try?

Idk man. What's the point?

Sharper lines while injected on the bone? How do you imagine this??? Sounds like some commercial :unsure:
Longer duration is arguable: it is one year, while Voluma lasts 2 for 44% of people, proven in a study :unsure:
Collagen boost is given by HA filler too, and this TBH sounds like some kind of commercial gimmick :unsure:

Less water attraction is probably true, so it is easier to add EXACTLY the required amount of product: fewer over-inflated faces with Radiesse. But well, if you can dissolve the HA filler, then there is no point in this benefit, except a more efficient use of money :unsure:

TBH it all sounds like your particular surgeon is just experienced with Radiesse, and does not want to use sth like Voluma, which he is less experienced with :unsure:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy
IIrc migration is worse and they can't be dissolved like HA

do what your surgeon reccomends, be conservative with amounts and you'll be fine
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 7098, Deleted member 9670 and Deleted member 16371
IIrc migration is worse and they can't be dissolved like HA

do what your surgeon reccomends, be conservative with amounts and you'll be fine
Both would get injected below muscles/soft tissue straight on the bone. So migration should not be that much like lips or other superficial filler.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: xanny, Deleted member 16371, Deleted member 16380 and 1 other person
John turk doesn’t even know what fillers are

What being boneless does to a mf
 
I know a doc you inject himself wie Radiesse for sharper jawline

So should be probably safe
 
Would probably stick to HA-fillers.
Restylane lyft as an example gives very sharp results and lasts a year, also you can get it dissolved at anytime if you dont like it, which makes filler so powerful if you don’t have Midface hypoplasia.
 
I know a doc you inject himself wie Radiesse for sharper jawline

So should be probably safe
Jawline is a lot safer when it comes to vascular occlusion or blindness
 
  • +1
Reactions: lasthope and Good_Little_Goy
Jawline is a lot safer when it comes to vascular occlusion or blindness
True

Sucks to not having a high prime/ sharp filler which is dissolvable
 

Similar threads

NVM_Ignacio
Replies
37
Views
1K
NVM_Ignacio
NVM_Ignacio
lebesgue
Replies
19
Views
1K
lebesgue
lebesgue
J
Replies
39
Views
4K
puggy
puggy
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Replies
132
Views
7K
goo25
goo25

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top