M
mogger123
jfl
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2022
- Posts
- 3,099
- Reputation
- 3,564
i'll wait
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I am also interested.i'll wait
I am also interested.
But for starters:
Error - Cookies Turned Off
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Muh Personality does not matter at all. Amount of romantic interest is determined by the level of attractiveness.
And then this nuclear height blackpill:
And then, the RACE-pill, final black-plague-pill:
![]()
This simply does not need any proof, just check the interviews of Asian women about white men vs asian men:
Let's go other way: what proof do you have that personality matters over face/height/race?pics/videos are not data
study is flawed in same way as online dating because there is no irl interaction between participants
I don't think it does. I think both are important and matter to varying degrees depending on the people involved and the context. also status is probably more important than bothLet's go other way: what proof do you have that personality matters over face/height/race?
Pics/videos ARE data. And since there are so many, it is GOOD DATA.
Personality does matter. But Blackpill is right. Looks are very important. And IMO looks > personality. However, if the looks are not TOO bad, like 4/10, then extremely good personality/character can overcome the deficiency enough to find some 4-5/10 girl.I don't think it does. I think both are important and matter to varying degrees depending on the people involved and the context.
It is my belief too.also status is probably more important than both
but no one thinks looks aren't important. the blackpill is fundamentally strawmanning your average person.Personality does matter. But Blackpill is right. Looks are very important. And IMO looks > personality. However, if the looks are not TOO bad, like 4/10, then extremely good personality/character can overcome the deficiency enough to find some 4-5/10 girl.
It is my belief too.
But e.g. two largest blackpills: height and race - are BOTH status-related. Both imitate the high status of the guy. Mimicry.
Yes, that's why blackpill is bullshit. A MORE correct name for this would be lookism. But blackpill is right in a sense that looks do matter more than personality in the search of a romantic partner.but no one thinks looks aren't important. the blackpill is fundamentally strawmanning your average person.
If we control for their looks, low inhib guys often go without girls, living asocial lifestyle. Often in prison.you are also misjudging how important personality is. look at low inhib guys irl, it is extremely rare to see them without a gf.
Every single study done on IRL speed-dating has the exact same results/implications as online-dating.pics/videos are not data
study is flawed in same way as online dating because there is no irl interaction between participants
I would imagine that ugly low inhib guys have more dating success than avoidant good looking guysIf we control for their looks, low inhib guys often go without girls, living asocial lifestyle. Often in prison.
ok then link 5Every single study done on IRL speed-dating has the exact same results/implications as online-dating.
No evidenceI would imagine that ugly low inhib guys have more dating success than avoidant good looking guys
cbaok then link 5
I thought u were NTpilledLet's go other way: what proof do you have that personality matters over face/height/race?
Pics/videos ARE data. And since there are so many, it is GOOD DATA.
how convenient
Everything has limits.I would imagine that ugly low inhib guys have more dating success than avoidant good looking guys
I am both-pilled.I thought u were NTpilled![]()
![]()
a lot of users here aren't even that autistic though, just a bit shy. most women don't want a trophy bf that lacks irl skills and never takes the romantic/dating initiative. huge turn off for them (obviously insanely good looking guys are excluded)Everything has limits.
If we take autists of Looksmax.org, even being CHAD does not save them. Because they are SO autistic, so asocial, that no woman would touch them with a 2-foot pole. It is if they even leave their basement to even meet women IRL.
however, with just the BARE minimum of social functionality, any guy chadlite on this website (7+/10) will have infinitely more success with women than even the most extroverted, socially open men who are ugly/average.
Nope. A LOT of users here are SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL. unless they larp ofc.a lot of users here aren't even that autistic though, just a bit shy.
It is a huge turn-off. But a SUFFICIENTLY good-looking man, which is high HTN+, will OVERRIDE THIS. Ugly/average women will call and initiate themselves with such men. This effect does not start from "insanely-good-looking". Just high-HTN.most women don't want a trophy bf that lacks irl skills and never takes the romanctic/dating initiative. huge turn off for them (obviously insanely good looking guys are excluded)
It’s ogrewhen in reality they are just VERY VERY MENTALLY ILL.
some are for sure, but I would say a considerable amount are fairly normalNope. A LOT of users here are SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL. unless they larp ofc.
Ask @Anstrum95 about Nana
![]()
It is a huge turn-off. But a SUFFICIENTLY good-looking man, which is high HTN+, will OVERRIDE THIS. Ugly/average women will call and initiate themselves with such men.
yeah, u make too many demands and u dont seem open for new views/opinions.how convenient
you said every single study proved it and you've replied to me twice already. jfl with this effort you could have found at least oneyeah, u make too many demands and u dont seem open for new views/opinions.
wasted effort digging up studies for you when you will just discard them anyways.
maybeyou said every single study proved it and you've replied to me twice already. jfl with this effort you could have found at least one
but how do we know that is looks and not status/personality/otherTop 5% of men accounted for the more sexual acts than bottom 50% of men.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._loneliness_A_neglected_public_health_problem
It's kinda water that more chadsexual would be having casual sex with chad. Most women are serial monogamist.
But blackpill is still retarded. It's only applicable for slaying. But slaying is bad for you even if you are chad.
It's all of them. Looks matter more than personality though for sexual attraction. For sexual success it's probably equal. Since more lower inhib you are more sexual interactions you are gonna pursue.but how do we know that is looks and not status/personality/other