Side Profile Bone Structure

[VampyrMaxx]

How do you know if yoh have good orbitals when viewing from the side. For example how do you know if the infras are recessed or if the

 

[imontheloose]

Orbital vector. If you have no tear troughs or any bad support from the front then you may just have good fat pads like O'Pry. From the sagittal plane, however, you can tell. It'll look like there is no support. Nothing securing the eye from below. A steep drop from eye to cheekbone.

The soft tissue to cornea test is alright, but it may seem fine with good enough fat pads. Nonetheless, you will always be able to note bad support or a sunken drop from cornea to the cheekbone.

 

[Sicilian Cyclops]

Orbital vector. If you have no tear troughs or any bad support from the front then you may just have good fat pads like O'Pry. From the sagittal plane, however, you can tell. It'll look like there is no support. Nothing securing the eye from below. A steep drop from eye to cheekbone.

The soft tissue to cornea test is alright, but it may seem fine with good enough fat pads. Nonetheless, you will always be able to note bad support or a sunken drop from cornea to the cheekbone.

true. from gandy's front , you'd never be able to tell he has a shit vector but from the side it tells a different story

 

[imontheloose]

Side profile is cope g
View attachment 3757830

Bad orbital vector itself isn't a death sentence, but it's usually a symptom of bad midface harmony. A death sentence for facial aesthetics.

 

[imontheloose]

View attachment 3757844

It's like O'Pry. Bad orbital vector/infras but frontally it is totally made up for by decent pads and the rest of the face.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Orbital vector. If you have no tear troughs or any bad support from the front then you may just have good fat pads like O'Pry. From the sagittal plane, however, you can tell. It'll look like there is no support. Nothing securing the eye from below. A steep drop from eye to cheekbone.

The soft tissue to cornea test is alright, but it may seem fine with good enough fat pads. Nonetheless, you will always be able to note bad support or a sunken drop from cornea to the cheekbone.

could you give an example, I'm still kind of confused. For example does Jensen Ackles have +,- or neutral vector?

 

[VampyrMaxx]

It's like O'Pry. Bad orbital vector/infras but frontally it is totally made up for by decent pads and the rest of the face.

I still can't tell idk

 

[imontheloose]

could you give an example, I'm still kind of confused. For example does Jensen Ackles have +,- or neutral vector?

Negative. You see his, eyebag area, let's call it? It has that steep drop, it doesn't gently contour into his cheekbone like Barrett's does.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Negative. You see his, eyebag area, let's call it? It has that steep drop, it doesn't gently contour into his cheekbone like Barrett's does. View attachment 3758000View attachment 3758013

that makes much more sense now but I still can't tell in some cases. Does Jensen Ackles have a positive OV. His eye bag drop is pretty steep but his cheekbones are forward which confuses me.

 

[imontheloose]

that makes much more sense now but I still can't tell in some cases. Does Jensen Ackles have a positive OV. His eye bag drop is pretty steep but his cheekbones are forward which confuses me.

I already said he has a NOV, son. That eyebag drop is steep, as you said. Thus a NOV. His cheekbones being projected is different.

 

[VampyrMaxx]

I already said he has a NOV, son. That eyebag drop is steep, as you said. Thus a NOV. His cheekbones being projected is different.

Thank you.

 

[imontheloose]

Thank you.

You're welcome, son. PAT PAT!