Skin whiteing can save Indians .

brown_slayer

brown_slayer

Iron
Joined
Mar 10, 2026
Posts
11
Reputation
0
For those Indian who still think Skin color isn't that big factor . Look at those photo . The orginal one look like Unr@peable while the Ai whiter version of her look like atleast +2.5 PSL point better (still ltb but look at the diffrence )some posative point
Gemini Generated Image wbqultwbqultwbqu
1781956303570
 
just better coloring for her phenotype
 
  • +1
Reactions: Poti
2.5 PSL is way too high of an upgrade, thats like saying she is an HTB now.

I get what you mean though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: theübermenschboy, banku don and libreversed.so
2.5 PSL is way too high of an upgrade, thats like saying she is an HTB now.

I get what you mean though.
she aint no htb:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy: tf is that raiting
 
  • +1
Reactions: banku don
she aint no htb:feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy: tf is that raiting
That's literally what I'm saying. OP said skin whitening ascended her 2.5 PSL points. If she is a 3 PSL now that would mean she would be 5.5 PSL or HTB after skin whitening. That is obviously ridiculous, if anything it ascended her from sub5 to mltb.
 
  • +1
Reactions: banku don
lltb to ltb
 
  • +1
Reactions: banku don
That's literally what I'm saying. OP said skin whitening ascended her 2.5 PSL points. If she is a 3 PSL now that would mean she would be 5.5 PSL or HTB after skin whitening. That is obviously ridiculous, if anything it ascended her from sub5 to mltb.
Average Indian are not that low (espically men) . Like i know some friend of mine who can look like 6/10+ but they have shit skin .For example that guy givven in that photo is only 16 . But you can see the potential I am saying how would they look if they did the same . About this girl yeah she is still a high 4/10 but in local standard she is a thousand time better looking than her previus self . Whatever is skin bleaching really contain that much risk as google says ?
2026 06 20 19 04
 
Last edited:
Average Indian are not that low (espically men) . Like i know some friend of mine who can look like 6/10+ but they have shit skin .For example that guy givven in that photo is only 16 . But you can see the potential I am saying how would they look if they did the same . About this girl yeah she is still a high 4/10 but in local standard she is a thousand time better looking than her previus self . Whatever is skin bleaching really contain that much risk as google says ? View attachment 5247337
Yeah skin lightening could ascend an Indian like how skin tanning ascends white people. I have no idea whether skin bleaching is risky as I am white and will never need to bleach my skin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: brown_slayer
Im bleaching my skin rn but too broke for hydroquinone using vitamin c
 
Poopjeetas aren't a good example cos they are gonna be sub5 and stinky looking regardless

Dudes are a better example
1000031129
1000031134
 
  • +1
Reactions: brown_slayer
Coloring
2025 11 26 16 46
no he’s insulting ur race u cuck are you that dumb
What about those Pakistani , Afanstani and North Indians ? those 1B indians dosen't represent our whole brown race . Whatever, i can see the chunk majority of average white and some ltn . Did you ever see how Indians was before British raj ? did you have read what greeks wrote about Indians (i am not agressive while saying this) .We have everything ltn , mtn , HTN and Chads just like anyother race have . (y)
1782491907943
1782491972102
1782492204131

Poopjeetas aren't a good example cos they are gonna be sub5 and stinky looking regardless

Dudes are a better example
View attachment 5248358View attachment 5248362
 
What about those Pakistani , Afanstani and North Indians ? those 1B indians dosen't represent our whole brown race . Whatever, i can see the chunk majority of average white and some ltn . Did you ever see how Indians was before British raj ? did you have read what greeks wrote about Indians (i am not agressive while saying this) .We have everything ltn , mtn , HTN and Chads just like anyother race have . (y) View attachment 5275588View attachment 5275590View attachment 5275602
1782492434597
 
Poopjeetas aren't a good example cos they are gonna be sub5 and stinky looking regardless

Dudes are a better example
View attachment 5248358View attachment 5248362
Yes, there is substantial, authoritative scientific and historical evidence proving that South Asians experienced a documented decline in physical stature due to colonization, poverty, and severe famines, and that they possess the genetic potential to be significantly taller. [1]
Regarding "good looks," science views beauty as subjective and culturally defined. However, early European, Mughal, and regional accounts consistently described pre-colonial South Asians as physically robust, striking, and highly attractive.
Historical anthropometrics, skeletal biology, and modern epigenetics break down the evidence for this transformation.

1. Archeological Proof: The Ancient Heights​

Skeletal remains from South Asia’s history show that ancient populations were notably taller than modern South Asians were at the end of the colonial period. [2]

  • The Indus Valley & Harappan Era: Skeletal data from Harappa and Mohenjo-daro (approx. 2500–1900 BCE) indicate that the average adult male height was roughly 170 cm to 173 cm (5’7" to 5’8"). This was equal to or taller than most contemporary European populations of that same ancient era. [2, 3]
  • The Transition to Agriculture: Much like the rest of the world, when South Asians transitioned from diverse hunter-gatherer diets to a heavy reliance on a single agricultural crop (like rice or wheat), average heights experienced a natural decline. However, they remained physically robust and resilient up until the modern colonial era. [4, 5, 6]

2. Historical Records: Pre-Colonial Vitality​

Before the British East India Company severely disrupted the local economy, travelers and local chronicles described South Asians as physically impressive and attractive:

  • The "Stalwart" Descriptions: Early British and European records from the late 1700s and early 1800s routinely described regional populations—such as Bengalis, Punjabis, and Rajputs—as "tall, broad-shouldered, and tireless." [7, 8]
  • Court and Artistic Records: Mughal-era miniature paintings and regional texts emphasized a cultural standard of beauty that celebrated athletic, well-proportioned bodies, clear complexions, and sharp features. The wealth of the region ensured a diet rich in dairy, whole grains, and diverse proteins, which maximized genetic growth potential. [9, 10]

3. The Colonial Stunting: Economic and Physical Decline​

The most definitive proof that poverty altered South Asian biology comes from historical anthropometrics (the study of human body measurements over history). [11]
Economic historians have tracked the heights of Indian indentured laborers and military recruits throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. The data reveals a devastating trend: [12, 13]

  • The Post-1850 Drop: As the British Raj systematically drained the region’s wealth—triggering over 30 major man-made famines that killed tens of millions—the biological standard of living plummeted. [7, 14, 15, 16]
  • Nutritional Stunting: Severe, multi-generational malnutrition acts as a physical brake. If a child does not receive enough protein and micronutrients, their body prioritizes organ survival over bone growth. Over a century of systemic poverty caused the average height of South Asians to shrink drastically, dropping to some of the lowest averages in the world by the mid-20th century. [14, 17, 18]

4. Genetic Proof: The "Starvation Adaptation"​

Modern geneticists have discovered that the extreme poverty and famines of the British Raj actually left a mark on South Asian DNA through a process called epigenetics (how environment changes how genes work).

  • To survive generations of starvation, South Asian bodies adapted by developing what is colloquially known as a "thrifty genotype" or a starvation adaptation gene. [7, 19, 20]
  • This gene forces the body to hoard fat easily and burn fewer calories. This was a brilliant mechanism for surviving a famine, but in the modern world, it makes South Asians genetically prone to lower lean muscle mass, belly fat, and diabetes—even at lower body weights. [4, 7, 21, 22, 23]

5. Proof via the Modern Diaspora​


The ultimate proof that South Asians are "genetically tall" but were environmentally suppressed is seen in the modern diaspora. [24]

  • Studies tracking South Asian children born and raised in wealthy Western countries (like the UK or US) show an immense intergenerational height jump. [25, 26]
  • When provided with modern healthcare, clean environments, and high-protein nutrition, South Asian children quickly catch up to or match the heights of Western populations, completely disproving the myth that South Asians are naturally or genetically short. [25, 26]

Would you like to explore more about this topic? You can choose one of these areas:
How epigenetics and the "thrifty gene" affect South Asian fitness and health todayThe exact historical height data of Indian indentured laborers under British ruleHow regional diets across South Asia historical influenced height differences
( Its just the economy bro )
[1] https://medicosnext.com
[2] https://www.facebook.com
[3] https://www.reddit.com
[4] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[5] https://www.reddit.com
[6] https://medium.com
[7] https://www.instagram.com
[8] https://www.researchgate.net
[9] https://www.reddit.com
[10] https://www.tayyarijeetki.in
[11] https://eh.net
[12] https://cris.tau.ac.il
[13] https://www.sciencedirect.com
[14] https://www.researchgate.net
[15] https://www.researchgate.net
[16] https://www.youtube.com
[17] https://www.researchgate.net
[18] https://www.facebook.com
[19] https://www.instagram.com
[20] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[21] https://www.facebook.com
[22] https://www.huffpost.com
[23] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[24] https://www.instagram.com
[25] https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk
[26] https://www.upf.edu
 
What about those Pakistani , Afanstani and North Indians ? those 1B indians dosen't represent our whole brown race . Whatever, i can see the chunk majority of average white and some ltn . Did you ever see how Indians was before British raj ? did you have read what greeks wrote about Indians (i am not agressive while saying this) .We have everything ltn , mtn , HTN and Chads just like anyother race have . (y) View attachment 5275588View attachment 5275590View attachment 5275602
dude i dont fucking care i was just pointing something out
 

Similar threads

grp2713
Replies
12
Views
117
U1fur
U1fur
...ee231
Replies
3
Views
39
LDAR_67
LDAR_67
parvaiz90
Replies
4
Views
59
parvaiz90
parvaiz90
parvaiz90
Replies
0
Views
29
parvaiz90
parvaiz90
rtacysapist69
Replies
2
Views
70
rtacysapist69
rtacysapist69

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top