slavs arent white

Because benjamin franklin regarded all euros as swarthy but states that they are all of the european race (though he also specifically took this back and stopped viewing them as swarthy), also every quote i sent completely disproves that take with the irish and spainards with the founding fathers, your claim has zero basis nor any backing
Tbf that idea of race wasn’t rooted in biology but in the
[Europe] was in a state of alignment...
 
Tbf that idea of race wasn’t rooted in biology but in the
Yeah thats bcuz the founding fathers werent biologists, but it disproves the idea of the foundig fathers being a super duper WASP exclusive club which is just factually wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quetila
As a hallstatt nordid, i think that slavs are whiter then southern europeans.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
ik that, i was just using the words u used for the sake of the argument.
Dude, “human lenses” aren’t a reality, why do you look for a hivemind in everything? Everything you’ve said here is about what most people agree on, from morality to race classifications


the ones who did it know it was evil but still did it
same with peophilea
The fact that they knew it was wrong is irrelevant, we’re talking about whether it’s objectively wrong or not, and it’s not

They think they know it’s objectively wrong (according to a biased system) for the same reason you are, they’re affected by their surroundings and indoctrinated with those systems

You’re looking for righteousness in who wasn’t right according to you, obviously you’re not going to fucking find it
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever and Hess
Its stupid to claim slavs are white, what is it even based on honestly?. America did a big damage to ethnic groups with their globalization of everything that people started to claim other races to assimilate mentally with them because of some "inferiority" complex

View attachment 5718444

Its stupid to claim slavs are white, what is it even based on honestly?. America did a big damage to ethnic groups with their globalization of everything that people started to claim other races to assimilate mentally with them because of some "inferiority" complex

View attachment 5718444
Slav shits
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
Dude, “human lenses” aren’t a reality, why do you look for a hivemind in everything? Everything you’ve said here is about what most people agree on, from morality to race classifications



The fact that they knew it was wrong is irrelevant, we’re talking about whether it’s objectively wrong or not, and it’s not

They think they know it’s objectively wrong (according to a biased system) for the same reason you are, they’re affected by their surroundings and indoctrinated with those systems

You’re looking for righteousness in who wasn’t right according to you, obviously you’re not going to fucking find it
ig bro:feelstastyman:
 
You’re not the sharpest child of western civilisation
i mean ud judge anyone whod rape a child and ud try to intervene

but you coulnt do that if morality was subjective

so u see the problem?
 
this is the 50th time I see this thread :hnghn:
this whole topic started because of how much slavic girls date out

I
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Its not even a dumb take whatsoever, but i am ragebaiting. I have way worse takes here
It IS a dumb take, you’re just redefining what constitutes the white race lol your definition is baseless and nobody uses it.
 
neither are fins, russians or anyone in southern europe
 
me and the slavic boys pulling up to ✨le debate✨
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8957.jpeg
    IMG_8957.jpeg
    60 KB · Views: 0
An indoctrinated individual?
well again

if it was morally ok for him to rape a child, who are you to judge him for that?

you cant judge anyone for anything if theres no objective morality
laws couldnt exist if it wasnt for objective morality
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
They are europeans (some of them) but europe itself isnt white. Only parts of the germanic tribes + northen europe due to admixture with germanic tribes can be classfied as white. This new all encomposing racial terms are so stupid and strip races of their true identity.

Ask urself, is a somali the same as a west african? are they both black?
dosent matter you will still be ugly either way
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
ok nigga


no i mean coulnt

cus if it was morally ok for him to rape a child, who are you to judge him for that
Ur mistaken.

Subjective ≠ judgment invalid

Saying a judgment is invalid is a judgment by itself

We can judge anyone, it’s not a matter of who am I to do so, it’s a matter of the power I possess to enforce my judgment on reality
 
i don't know where this bullshit about slavs being non-white comes from
i don't remember any famous anthropologist or genetist who was labeling them as "non-white"
all say they are white
what you think all that comes from?
U guys are so weird. Everyone knows they ain’t white. I fell on the weirdest people here
 
No, you’re retarded


yes, because I’m empathetic and this is assisted by the empathy-oriented morality of society


couldn’t? you mean wouldn’t? if morality was subjective (it is, this is not a hypothetical) I would
morality is objective because God
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Quetila
  • JFL
Reactions: JewishNationalist
Ur mistaken.

Subjective ≠ judgment invalid

Saying a judgment is invalid is a judgment by itself

We can judge anyone, it’s not a matter of who am I to do so, it’s a matter of the power I possess to enforce my judgment on reality
ur dumb

no we cant judge anyone if there is no basis to judge them on
that basis can be subjective and objective yes BUT
if you judge sb form a subjective basis, then its a unvalid judgement cus you just judge from your personal view (which is invalid cus every1 has one)


like nigga do i have to explain everything to you?
you cant judge anyone for anything if theres no objective morality
laws couldnt exist if it wasnt for objective morality, otherwise wed have prisons full of innocent ppl

societies work based on objectivity bro pls wake up from ur goatis glaze, were not in nature :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
ur dumb

no we cant judge anyone if there is no basis to judge them on
that basis can be subjective and objective yes BUT
if you judge sb form a subjective basis, then its a unvalid judgement cus you just judge from your personal view (which is invalid cus every1 has one)


like nigga do i have to explain everything to you?
you cant judge anyone for anything if theres no objective morality
laws couldnt exist if it wasnt for objective morality, otherwise wed have prisons full of innocent ppl

societies work based on objectivity bro pls wake up from ur goatis glaze, were not in nature :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
Ur base of judgment over people is through ur own subjective framework
 
No, it’s factual. Slavs are Slavs. White is now an umbrella term but originally referred to Anglo saxons that’s all
nah slavs descended from corded ware like anglos so basically same race although different subraces
 
ur dumb

no we cant judge anyone if there is no basis to judge them on
that basis can be subjective and objective yes BUT
if you judge sb form a subjective basis, then its a unvalid judgement cus you just judge from your personal view (which is invalid cus every1 has one)


like nigga do i have to explain everything to you?
you cant judge anyone for anything if theres no objective morality
laws couldnt exist if it wasnt for objective morality, otherwise wed have prisons full of innocent ppl

societies work based on objectivity bro pls wake up from ur goatis glaze, were not in nature :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
Stop crying and being a retard u pissing me off.

That basis of judgment is always subjective, judgment = subjective view/opinion.

Subjective judgment is invalid according to ur opinion, but u see how we disagree? We both coming to different conclusions/judgments on a philosophical manner.

Same applies for morality, I already gave u the example of ancient society’s and their “moral/imoral” acts, but why should I go? Look no further than the current debate amongst abortion
 
nah slavs descended from corded ware like anglos so basically same race although different subraces
“We all descend from similar places and people so we the same race” fuck no
 
Stop crying and being a retard u pissing me off.
ur the goatis nature retard bro

im 193 and been going to the gym 2 years now. ill rape tf out of u in nature if i want to. and then what?
ur gonna take it like a little boy cus its only wrong out of ur subjective judgement?

if theres no objective morality ud be fine with me raping you. and i know ur not
in fact im also not fine with being raped by sb stronger than me
and no person on this planet is fine with that

thats called objective morality. and thats why we have laws
 
ur the goatis nature retard bro

im 193 and been going to the gym 2 years now. ill rape tf out of u in nature if i want to. and then what?
ur gonna take it like a little boy cus its only wrong out of ur subjective judgement?

if theres no objective morality ud be fine with me raping you. and i know ur not
in fact im also not fine with being raped by sb stronger than me
and no person on this planet is fine with that

thats called objective morality. and thats why we have laws
God u are so stupid JESUS…

No we have laws because objective morality Isnt real u fucking moron.

U don’t get borned into this world and an angel or universal morality law is presented infront of u and the morality is injected into ur brain (and yes we are programmed for certain things through evolution but that’s beyond the point)

again u still haven’t acknowledged my abortion example
 
No, it’s factual. Slavs are Slavs. White is now an umbrella term but originally referred to Anglo saxons that’s all
Crazy how you keep making this claim with zero evidence to back it up, here is where it actually came from you illiterate retard,
Swedish botanist Carl linneaus was one of the first people to categorize humans by geographic origin in 1735 and labeled Europeans as "White".

"Systema Naturae, Linnaeus did not use the word "race"; instead, he split the human species (Homo sapiens) into four geographic "varieties" corresponding to the four continents known to him. The category he designated as white was:



Homo sapiens europaeus (referred to in early editions as Europaeus albus or "European white" "

you keep making this claim but the only person who even vaguely held this view during that time was franklin who famously took it back with his compatriots championing the opposite of saying that european = white as well as all legal documents treating slavs and such as white under the 1790 naturalization act
 
Crazy how you keep making this claim with zero evidence to back it up, here is where it actually came from you illiterate retard,
Swedish botanist Carl linneaus was one of the first people to categorize humans by geographic origin in 1735 and labeled Europeans as "White".

"Systema Naturae, Linnaeus did not use the word "race"; instead, he split the human species (Homo sapiens) into four geographic "varieties" corresponding to the four continents known to him. The category he designated as white was:



Homo sapiens europaeus (referred to in early editions as Europaeus albus or "European white" "

you keep making this claim but the only person who even vaguely held this view during that time was franklin who famously took it back with his compatriots championing the opposite of saying that european = white as well as all legal documents treating slavs and such as white under the 1790 naturalization act
you keep making this claim of white being anglo saxon only but this has literally NEVER been the case, at best they put themselves on top of a white racial hiearchy but they still considered all europeans as part of the white race
 
God u are so stupid JESUS…

No we have laws because objective morality Isnt real u fucking moron.

U don’t get borned into this world and an angel or universal morality law is presented infront of u and the morality is injected into ur brain (and yes we are programmed for certain things through evolution but that’s beyond the point)

again u still haven’t acknowledged my abortion example
so my question also still stands
are u gonna take my raping just because im stronger?
cus again, if u believe in subjective morality, who are you to tell me in nature that i cant rape u?

and to the abortion debate, its pretty easy:
the problem on this debate is wether a baby in the womb classifies as a human being with right or not.
the debate is not: is it ok to kill the baby?
the debate is: is it biologically already a baby or not?
if everyone for sure would agree that it is a baby the debate would be over. :lul:
 
ur the goatis nature retard bro

im 193 and been going to the gym 2 years now. ill rape tf out of u in nature if i want to. and then what?
ur gonna take it like a little boy cus its only wrong out of ur subjective judgement?

if theres no objective morality ud be fine with me raping you. and i know ur not
in fact im also not fine with being raped by sb stronger than me
and no person on this planet is fine with that

thats called objective morality. and thats why we have laws
Im against being raped bcuz it goes against my self interest, not because its based on some objective morality, thats a retarded statement and nor is it equal to an objective morality
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
If there’s any doubt if someone’s white, they aren’t
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
Im against being raped bcuz it goes against my self interest, not because its based on some objective morality, thats a retarded statement and nor is it equal to an objective morality
ur conflating objective morality with subjective morality based on keeping social cohesion inside ingroups/tribes, an objective morality exists outside of social consensus and is a deified form of moral good and bad, like how christian and religious morality acts @troy_exe
 
Im against being raped bcuz it goes against my self interest, not because its based on some objective morality, thats a retarded statement and nor is it equal to an objective morality
oml
of course ur against it. bc its against ur will. OBVIOUSLY NIGGA

but the point is that you have no right to tell me not to rape you if theres only subjective morality
 
ur conflating objective morality with subjective morality based on keeping social cohesion inside ingroups/tribes, an objective morality exists outside of social consensus and is a deified form of moral good and bad, like how christian and religious morality acts @troy_exe
the point is that you have no right to tell me not to rape you if theres only subjective morality
 
oml
of course ur against it. bc its against ur will. OBVIOUSLY NIGGA

but the point is that you have no right to tell me not to rape you if theres only subjective morality
ur conflating objective morality with subjective morality based on keeping social cohesion inside ingroups/tribes, an objective morality exists outside of social consensus and is a deified form of moral good and bad, like how christian and religious morality acts @troy_exe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
Even in his own definition it makes zero sense, austrians are pretty celtic and slavic, east germans have extremely high slavic admixture as well as bavarians having a siginificant amount of slavic admixture, the term germanic is far more of a linguistic and cultural term than mostly genetic lol
nah the term germanic or slavic or whatever is always ancestral rahter than linguistic
if it was linguistic or cultural then even an australian aboriginal could become germanic if learnt some of germanic languages lol
 
ur conflating objective morality with subjective morality based on keeping social cohesion inside ingroups/tribes, an objective morality exists outside of social consensus and is a deified form of moral good and bad, like how christian and religious morality acts @troy_exe
just answer the question

if there is subjective reality
who are you to prohibit me from raping you
(if there wasnt laws obv)
 
@troy_exe I never said anyone has an implicit natural right to be against rape, but that you would oppose it out of your self interest, not because there is a moral law or you view it as wrong but because as man you support advancing your own interests over others, the same person that opposes being raped would probably also not mind raping himself, idk how that is an example of objective morality, a better example for this though would be murder, no one wants to be killed but many people are perfectly fine with killing others.
 
Im against being raped bcuz it goes against my self interest, not because its based on some objective morality, thats a retarded statement and nor is it equal to an objective morality
At least on this shit ur correct
 

Similar threads

LowInhibNoSMV
Replies
38
Views
133
Joeseminate
Joeseminate
Faceless.
Replies
4
Views
41
fxresdz
fxresdz
JewishNationalist
Replies
3
Views
60
mangotimer
mangotimer
kliiipss
Replies
11
Views
45
kliiipss
kliiipss
chud10282892
Replies
13
Views
111
IndecentEyes
IndecentEyes

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top