LowTierBateman
🩵
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2026
- Posts
- 15,964
- Reputation
- 24,048
Arguing for an hour over something pointless is high iq nowadaysno correlation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Arguing for an hour over something pointless is high iq nowadaysno correlation
my nigga do you realize what site we are onProlly thinks that by defending foids hed get laid
arguing is never pointless. thinking it's pointless and not caring is low iq.Arguing for an hour over something pointless is high iq nowadays
Youre clearly not high iq if you feel the need to do this
what about the ad hominem you were going to pull @ me?no correlation
but it's not of one dude. You do realise that you can see the statistics for how many abortions have happened this year or last year. You do realise that they don't come from thin air, they come from promiscuous people and being degeneratesof course whores exist
but you can’t predicate a whole argument about abortion off the anecdotal experience of one dude getting no play
well either because they can't get them or because we can acknowledge that someone being a degenerate isn't a good thing for soycietywhy are people who obviously don't fuck so obessed with muhh whores. why would you even know jfl.
atp probsIm wondering if this thread will get atleast 3 pages
perfectly said, thank you.There is no reason to believe that a fetus can experience consciousness without thalamocortical connections, and therefore no real reason to be anti-abortion/pro-life. The only thing you could argue is that it's always (or nearly always) going to be better for the parent and/or child, but I don't see how one would derive that logically. Maybe you want some specific population trends and therefore more babies overall (implying no abortion), but I think such ideological beliefs become secondary to bodily autonomy. Besides, there are much better ways to incentivize population growth (like specific policies granting young adults economic benefits for having children and/or getting married)
@thecaste
Arguing is always pointlessarguing is never pointless. thinking it's pointless and not caring is low iq.
I'm not really interested in geopolitics. Sure, my profile might look like a very political profile but it's not really.arguing is never pointless. thinking it's pointless and not caring is low iq.
it’s honestly fun to a arguearguing is never pointless. thinking it's pointless and not caring is low iq.
you don't apply the same standars to men. somehow it's being idolized on here to behave like clav, be a drug addict, treat women and service workers and whoever like complete shit, fuck a new girl every night etc.well either because they can't get them or because we can acknowledge that someone being a degenerate isn't a good thing for soyciety
are you kidding me? that's the worst word slop I am yet to readperfectly said, thank you.
anyone of you dimwits care to provide a coherent counterargument not involving "muhh whore"?
Well i dont hide almost anything when talking w foids n yet still have them actively messaging medo you guys live in the real word? do you think you get laid when acting muhh alpha and tuff?
talk to me again when you're an adult.
Its pretty entertainingArguing for an hour over something pointless is high iq nowadays
I've mentioned many times I am a Christcel on the forum jflyall are not being consistent. I wouldn't mind if you were actually religious or had a moral compass but you don't; you just hate women.
you want these “degenerate whores” to spawn fatherless broken and impoverished kids?but it's not of one dude. You do realise that you can see the statistics for how many abortions have happened this year or last year. You do realise that they don't come from thin air, they come from promiscuous people and being degenerates
you can thank me laterView attachment 5259398
The low quality post i made for the sake of posting is gaining some pretty serious attention
pro abortion doesn't mean pro death, what even is this stupid narrativeWhy do you even accept their frame to begin with? You don't need to justify being pro-life and pro-human in general jfl, that's what you are supposed to be naturally.
Pro-death advocates are not even human, they are subhumans because they promote death, so you don't owe them shit.
U n iblamexyz be carrying the whole threadyou can thank me later
we are the goats @iblamexyzU n iblamexyz be carrying the whole thread
absolute iqlet retard take nobody here wants humans to die.Why do you even accept their frame to begin with? You don't need to justify being pro-life and pro-human in general jfl, that's what you are supposed to be naturally.
Pro-death advocates are not even human, they are subhumans because they promote death, so you don't owe them shit.
what do you think happens during an abortion? You are aware that during an abortion the baby is killedpro abortion doesn't mean pro death, what even is this stupid narrative
Once again there are consequences for your actions. Maybe they should close their legs but if that's not an option, there are loads of loving parents who would love to take that child into the adoption scheme. There are tons of children who, if they got adopted, would actually feel loved and cherished.you want these “degenerate whores” to spawn fatherless broken and impoverished kids?
THERE IS NO BABYwhat do you think happens during an abortion? You are aware that during an abortion the baby is killed
Once again there are consequences for your actions. Maybe they should close their legs but if that's not an option, there are loads of loving parents who would love to take that child into the adoption scheme. There are tons of children who, if they got adopted, would actually feel loved and cherished.
By supporting abortion or the industry or even women to be promiscuous in order to pass the law for children to get killed, it is enforcing babies to not get a chance in life and to die.absolute iqlet retard take nobody here wants humans to die.
Feel free to critique my arguments. I would normally have written something more elaborate, but I didn’t feel like itare you kidding me? that's the worst word slop I am yet to read
again: "they should close their legs"; you solely blame the woman even though both parties took part in the sexual activity.what do you think happens during an abortion? You are aware that during an abortion the baby is killed
Once again there are consequences for your actions. Maybe they should close their legs but if that's not an option, there are loads of loving parents who would love to take that child into the adoption scheme. There are tons of children who, if they got adopted, would actually feel loved and cherished.
"the industry"By supporting abortion or the industry or even women to be promiscuous in order to pass the law for children to get killed, it is enforcing babies to not get a chance in life and to die.
You don't have to be a morafag or even muh left to acknowledge that when a child is being killed, that's pretty bad
name one time in recorded human history telling people to “close their legs” has ever workedwhat do you think happens during an abortion? You are aware that during an abortion the baby is killed
Once again there are consequences for your actions. Maybe they should close their legs but if that's not an option, there are loads of loving parents who would love to take that child into the adoption scheme. There are tons of children who, if they got adopted, would actually feel loved and cherished.
not a child.By supporting abortion or the industry or even women to be promiscuous in order to pass the law for children to get killed, it is enforcing babies to not get a chance in life and to die.
You don't have to be a morafag or even muh left to acknowledge that when a child is being killed, that's pretty bad
Looks like the pro-death crowd found my comment.Why do you even accept their frame to begin with? You don't need to justify being pro-life and pro-human in general jfl, that's what you are supposed to be naturally.
Pro-death advocates are not even human, they are subhumans because they promote death, so you don't owe them shit.
0/10 ragebaitLooks like the pro-death crowd found my comment.
Always nice to be proven right.
what planet are you fromno woman wants to have an abortion cause it's fun and nice,
over 95% of them are done without reasonOkay sure because I'm only holding women responsible for it because again there are other things like hypergamy whereas statistically it's just easier for them to hook up and as women are the birth givers, I'm just giving them more responsibility.again: "they should close their legs"; you solely blame the woman even though both parties took part in the sexual activity.
no consistency. you are just a misogynist.
But once again you called me a puppet for being into geopolitics. Again do you really not think there are people behind there?"the industry"
you really think there is an abortion "industry"? are you schizophrenic?
not a child.
it isn’t viable yet.
agree to disagree regardless of what you think in terms of what happens in the womb, that baby is definitely missing out on the opportunity to liveTHERE IS NO BABY
are u familiar with basic biology?
what planet are you fromover 95% of them are done without reason
You can’t change a retards mind.Looks like the pro-death crowd found my comment.
Always nice to be proven right.
trying to justify killing children just to have a 2% higher chance at getting a girl is prime incel behavior
just because you don't deem it as a viable reason doesn't mean that it was done "without reason". nobody voluntarily gets pregnant just to get an abortion.

agree to an extent, of course there are people who profit from it, but there is no "industry", the costs to get an abortion are low and the abortion rate is not that high either. it's not scaleable either.But once again you called me a puppet for being into geopolitics. Again do you really not think there are people behind there?
If you're anti Semitic, you'd probably say the Jews are behind it. If you are religious, you'd probably say Satan is behind it but do you really not think that someone is there to profit
you can't just disagree with facts broagree to disagree regardless of what you think in terms of what happens in the womb, that baby is definitely missing out on the opportunity to live
Meh, i think she already knew what id say anywaystheres this thing called lying
it's baffling how low iq you aretrying to justify killing children just to have a 2% higher chance at getting a girl is prime incel behavior![]()
When I mean industry, I don't necessarily mean an organization which is collecting money from killing babies or killing babies for pleasure as a whole. What is the long term goal?agree to an extent, of course there are people who profit from it, but there is no "industry", the costs to get an abortion are low and the abortion rate is not that high either. it's not scaleable either.
you can't just disagree with facts bro![]()
it's just not. there's a reason why murdering a freshly pregnant woman is not double homicide. it's POTENTIAL life.Okay so I won't disagree with facts. Fact is when a woman's impregnated, that is a child in there
yeah, what is the long term goal? you think the long term goal is to get women to have daily abortions or what?When I mean industry, I don't necessarily mean an organization which is collecting money from killing babies or killing babies for pleasure as a whole. What is the long term goal?
There are far more babies and children in need of adoptive families than there are people willing to adopt. What you're suggesting would, in practice, just result in more children in orphanages or foster care. Why would one wish that upon a baby for no reason? The alternative isn't death; it's just not being born at all. That's a state of neutrality. I'm also yet to mention the psychological effects having an unwanted child can have on the parents, especially the mother. When you don't want your baby, you're likely not going to be as good of a parent as you would have been otherwise. Women seeking abortion are also often in financially unfortunate situations, again contributing to a poor environment for the children.there are loads of loving parents who would love to take that child into the adoption scheme. There are tons of children who, if they got adopted, would actually feel loved and cherished.
But then again, why should there be, when there is no drawback to removing it? I don't think bodily autonomy triumphs over an actual baby... that would be insane. But given that there is no conscious living being, I don't see why we wouldn't make life easier for them. More importantly, not give the children a disadvantage from the startOnce again there are consequences for your actions. Maybe they should close their legs but if that's not an option
calling murder healthcare is cagefuelit's just not. there's a reason why murdering a freshly pregnant woman is not double homicide. it's POTENTIAL life.
yeah, what is the long term goal? you think the long term goal is to get women to have daily abortions or what?
there is no long term goal, my god. it's healthcare.
The pro-death lobby is working overtime tonight. Always a good sign that the message reached its intended audience.Looks like the pro-death crowd found my comment.
Always nice to be proven right.
you keep shifting the narrative. it's useless.calling murder healthcare is cagefuel
prolly soon theres gonna be 4th page aswellit's sad seeing you adopting these retarded viewpoints. I hope you'll grow out of it.Ts keeps on getting more viewersprolly soon theres gonna be 4th page aswell
I would argue that a baby limbs being ripped apart is straight murder but okayyou keep shifting the narrative. it's useless.
you can't just make up your own facts and present it as the objective truth.
it's not murder under any law nor is it life biologically speaking. how are you getting through day to day life with that mindset?
once again the solution is to not be a degenerate. If you have sex, you are aware of the repercussions. If you aren't, you're welcome to use protection. It's why it exists. I might disagree with it but it doesn't matter. It exists for a reason.There are far more babies and children in need of adoptive families than there are people willing to adopt. What you're suggesting would, in practice, just result in more children in orphanages or foster care. Why would one wish that upon a baby for no reason? The alternative isn't death; it's just not being born at all. That's a state of neutrality. I'm also yet to mention the psychological effects having an unwanted child can have on the parents, especially the mother. When you don't want your baby, you're likely not going to be as good of a parent as you would have been otherwise. Women seeking abortion are also often in financially unfortunate situations, again contributing to a poor environment for the children.
But then again, why should there be, when there is no drawback to removing it? I don't think bodily autonomy triumphs over an actual baby... that would be insane. But given that there is no conscious living being, I don't see why we wouldn't make life easier for them. More importantly, not give the children a disadvantage from the start